Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sudafedfiend8: Difference between revisions
JonRidinger (talk | contribs) →Comments by other users: clarified |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
||
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
||
and bingo was his name-o |
|||
I do not plead the 5th |
|||
ironically, most of my contributions (I would argue) have been constructive, all in good faith... but I do understand (reluctantly) your/Wikipedia's need to police such action. adieu |
|||
b. i. n. g. o. |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
||
Revision as of 05:43, 1 March 2010
Sudafedfiend8
- Sudafedfiend8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date February 28 2010, 22:05 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Teartheroofoff78 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheBlankingCompany79 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Iwascuredallright71 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheQuestionMarkWasEmphasized (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Scavenger01 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ontothenextonecavs (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MillenniumScavenger (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Wearealllisteners1007 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Crowcrow22 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Wmmswxtmwenz01 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by MikeWazowski
These accounts all have an affinity for a small range of articles - mainly WMMS (one even used that station's callsigns as his username) or articles related to it, and have all tended to edit in succession, suggesting an editor constantly creating new accounts to give the illusion of multiple editors. The initial creation or disposition of each of their userpages is remarkably similar. The more recent accounts share a pattern on Ohio Junior Classical League, Stow-Munroe Falls High School, Darth Vader and Palpatine, with two of the accounts (71.64.103.117 and Wmmswxtmwenz01) sharing identical edit-warring patterns on the last two articles mentioned. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
and bingo was his name-o
I do not plead the 5th
ironically, most of my contributions (I would argue) have been constructive, all in good faith... but I do understand (reluctantly) your/Wikipedia's need to police such action. adieu
b. i. n. g. o.
Comments by other users
I strongly agree with this and have noticed this pattern myself. The accounts have many habits in common. Ridernyc (talk) 23:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- This anonymous user already has a history of sockpuppetry by creating multiple accounts and using each one for a very short time. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smfhs photographer/Archive. There are some others that could probably be added including User:Itsalwayssunnyinstow, User:Jokepoet302, User:Dutytrial30, User:Smileyousonofa75, User:STFUn00b333, and possibly others at the Stow-Munroe Falls High School page. All of them have the same user page and talk page appearance with just one line or blanked. --JonRidinger (talk) 23:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)