Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yasir72.multan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Update; not sure whether I can mark it as closed or not
marking case status as closed
Line 5: Line 5:


=====<big>02 October 2013</big>=====
=====<big>02 October 2013</big>=====
{{SPI case status|}}
{{SPI case status|close}}


;Suspected sockpuppets
;Suspected sockpuppets

Revision as of 11:33, 4 October 2013

Yasir72.multan

Yasir72.multan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


02 October 2013

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Creating same pages as the previous sock did but with different title:

Similar content articles can be found in Abcd13.abcd (talk · contribs) 's deleted contributions with title:

--SMS Talk 14:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC) SMS Talk 14:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Admin action has been taken and Chennai98.express has been blocked by RHaworth as a sock of Yasir72.multan. So this report is now resolved. --SMS Talk 11:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


03 October 2013

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

A duck case I guess. As Chennai98.express suggested in this message I received a warning from this newbie. SMS Talk 17:24, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • information Administrator note I have indefinitely blocked the account for violating the Username policy (impersonating/implying they are an official representative of Wikipedia). I have no opinion on the user's behavior as relating to this case. —Darkwind (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]