3M22 Zircon: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 21:1121:11, 23 June 2024‎ Swatjester talk contribs‎ 50,838 bytes −400‎ Undid revision 1230586532 by XANTHO GENOS 5.5.2024 (talk) TASS is a generally unreliable source, per WP:TASS Tag: Undo
curprev 15:4215:42, 23 June 2024‎ XANTHO GENOS 5.5.2024 talk contribs‎ 51,238 bytes +400‎ →‎Development: Added new information. Tag: Reverted

curprev 23:5623:56, 5 June 2024‎ Swatjester talk contribs‎ 50,831 bytes −417‎ →‎Design: removing unsourced claims, see talk page discussion

curprev 21:0421:04, 4 May 2024‎ Swatjester talk contribs‎ 51,248 bytes +604‎ →‎Deployment: adding additional, non-Ukrainian source and c/e language around interception of Zircon by Patriot and SAMP/T as the terminal phase slowdown is well documented (only the part about the actual interception, not the Zircon's flight profile, is an allegation). Tag: Visual edit
curprev 14:4514:45, 4 May 2024‎ F.Alexsandr talk contribs‎ 50,644 bytes +22‎ /* Deployment *accurate to the source Tag: Visual edit

curprev 04:4904:49, 13 April 2024‎ VioletEscalator talk contribs‎ 50,622 bytes +1‎ Corrected a spelling error that said poduced Tag: Visual edit
curprev 00:1700:17, 13 April 2024‎ Swatjester talk contribs‎ 50,621 bytes +37‎ wikilink EO Tag: Visual edit
curprev 00:1300:13, 13 April 2024‎ Swatjester talk contribs‎ 50,584 bytes −120‎ cleaned up a significant amount of NPOV, OR, and SYNTH. Tag: Visual edit

curprev 23:5623:56, 12 April 2024‎ Swatjester talk contribs‎ 50,704 bytes −1,072‎ AIN source does not support the claim of a 300-400kg warhead weight; it refers to those figures as "estimates" and argues that the Russian government's claims about the weapons performance are higher than what defense experts suspect in reality. The Expert.ru link uncritically repeats said estimates as fact, without explaining methodology or original sourcing, and is an unreliable source in this context. There's a talk page section to discuss.
curprev 23:5223:52, 12 April 2024‎ Swatjester talk contribs‎ 51,776 bytes −34‎ unsourced