Jump to content

Bad Science (Taubes book)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 06:39, 21 July 2021 (Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by RoanokeVirginia | Category:American history books | #UCB_Category 134/219). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion
First edition cover
AuthorGary Taubes
LanguageEnglish
SubjectCold fusion
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherRandom House
Publication date
1993-06-15
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint
Pages503 pp.
ISBN978-0-394-58456-0
OCLC26811416
539.7/64 20
LC ClassQC791.775.C64 T38 1993

Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion is book of science history by Gary Taubes about the early years (1989–1991) of the cold fusion controversy.

Overview

[edit]

This text is not a scholarly work, but a popular retelling of the events, based on interviews with over 260 people. The book presents a timeline of the events, making the case that the cold fusion field has many examples of poorly performed science. The actions of Martin Fleischmann, Stanley Pons, and Steven E. Jones, the scientists who made the dramatic first claims of fusion, are described in rich detail. The book then shows the worldwide reaction and later disrepute of the cold fusion field,[1] with Taubes placing himself in the side of "good science".[2] Taubes says at the end that cold fusion had only demonstrated that research can continue even if the phenomenon doesn't actually exist, as long as there is funding available.[3] Taubes had previously written an article for Science in which he insinuates that the cold fusion work of A&M University was fraudulent.[4]

Reception

[edit]

The book received a positive review in American Journal of Physics. While observing that the book was "readable, suspenseful, and insightful", the reviewer criticized it for including too many footnotes (over 300), some of which were deemed unimportant.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Gieryn, 1999
  2. ^ Mirowski, 2002
  3. ^ Mirowski, 2002, in reference to page 426 of 1993 edition of the book
  4. ^ Taubes, 1990

Bibliography

[edit]