Uniform Anatomical Gift Act
The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), and its periodic revisions, is one of the Uniform Acts drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), also known as the Uniform Law Commission (ULC), in the United States with the intention of harmonizing state laws between the states.[1][2][3]
The UAGA governs organ donations for the purpose of transplantation.[3] The Act permits any adult to become an organ donor.[4] It also governs the making of anatomical gifts of one's cadaver to be dissected in the study of medicine.[3] The law prescribes the forms by which such gifts can be made.[3][2][1] It also provides that in the absence of such a document, a surviving spouse, or if there is no spouse, a list of specific relatives in order of preference, can make the gift.[3] It also seeks to limit the liability of health care providers who act on good faith representations that a deceased patient meant to make an anatomical gift.[3] The Act also prohibits trafficking and trafficking in human organs for profit from donations for transplant or therapy.[5][6]
The UAGA provides a template for the legislation to adjust public policy and align it with developments in medical practice.[3] Some states have their own version of the UAGA which is an updated version of the Uniform laws already enacted throughout the United States.[7][8]
History
There were three versions of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act that were enacted; the first was the UAGA of 1968, which was followed up with revisions in 1987. The most recent version was created in 2006.[3] The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act has been established in some form, in every state and the District of Columbia (D.C.), as of 2017.[7][4]
The law has been revised to make the process of making an anatomical gift more streamlined, and to promote organ donation to citizens in order to address the high demand for donated organs for transplantation.[citation needed] The demand for donated organs is extremely high due to the fact that a large number of people die while waiting for an organ transplant in the United States.[5][3] As of 2016, there were fewer registered organ donors than people in need of an organ or tissue transplant.[5]
Formerly, anatomical gifts had to be executed with testamentary formalities, including the creation of a written document with two witnesses; the latest version of the statute eliminates the requirement of the witnesses.[2] Medical examiners and medical professionals who cared for a patient upon their death were previously permitted to remove a part of a body if there was no known next of kin, or if the body was unidentified.[5] This change is to encourage the practice of allowing an anatomical gift to be made by a notation on a driver's license.[5][3]
The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1968
The first Uniform Anatomical Gift Act was created after the first successful heart transplant in 1967; the operation was performed by Dr. Christiaan Barnard.[3] In 1968, Congress approved the UAGA and recommended that all states adopt it.[9] The Act was the first legislation enacted by all states in United States to address the donation of organs, tissues, and eyes as gifts to someone who may be in need of an organ for survival.[2][3] The UAGA was drafted in order to increase organ and blood supplies and donation and to protect patients in the United States.[9] It replaced numerous state laws concerning transplantation and laws lacking a uniform procedure of organ donation and an inadequate process of becoming a donor.[9]
All states adopted the original version of the law.[2]
The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1987
In 1987, the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1968 was revised so that there was a uniform manner of obtaining consent from individuals.[9][3] At this time, every state enacted at least some part of the UAGA.[9] The provisions of the UAGA of 1968 would ban the purchase and sale of body parts, facilitate the simplified process of obtaining authorization to retrieve organs, and ensure that medical staff establish procedures and guidelines to identify organ donors while under hospital care.[10] The Act also characterized a body part or organ as property because of the ability of a living individual to gift parts of their body to another individual.[1][9] Another major statement that this revised version of the UAGA made was that a coroner's investigation or an autopsy could not be obstructed by an individual's wish for organ donation.[9] The 1987 UAGA regulated organs for the purposes of transplantation or therapy.[10] In addition, the individual's wishes to donate were prioritized over the family's or next of kin's wishes. Hospitals were authorized to retrieve organs if an individual was found to have documentation of consenting.[10]
The Act's revisions were enacted by 26 states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.[1]
The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006
Summary
In 2006, The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act was revised with three main goals: motivating more of the population to make anatomical gifts, making honoring an individual's wishes to donate a priority, and maintaining the current organ donation and transplantation system in the United States.[5] It also has the purpose of setting rules and guidelines for determining the purposes that one had for choosing to make a gift as well as the purpose of the gift of an organ, eye, or tissue itself.[3] The UAGA was revised to accommodate the developments in medicine and science regarding organ donation and transplantation, as well as the regulations of donation and transplantation with the goal of increasing the supply of gifted organs.[5][3] The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006 was revised to make the laws governing anatomical gifts more uniform between states that had enacted and continued to enforce the UAGA of 1968 and ones that had enacted the revised UAGA of 1987, leading to more consistency.[3]
Revisions
The UAGA of 2006 allows for individuals to consent to organ donation by expressing their wish when obtaining a driver's license, through verbal expression, by writing it in a will or other advance directive, or in any other manner, simplifying the consent process.[3] This is also known as "opting in" to organ donation.[citation needed] In some states, one may register to become an organ donor online on a state's Donor Registry website, and an individual is permitted to choose which organs they wish to donate by checking boxes.[5] An important addition to the UAGA of 2006 was the strengthening of certain language regarding one's right to make a decision for themselves pertaining to consent of organ donation, making it harder for others to try to nullify one's wish to consent after their death.[6][3] The only exception allowing an individual's consent to donate to be overridden is in the case of the death of a minor when parents or guardians may override the minor's consent.[6][3] Language in the Act is also made more clear so that one cannot revoke an anatomical gift as the donor's decision is final.[6][3] This revised UAGA additionally created legislation allowing certain people to make an anatomical gift to another person while the donating individual is still alive.[3] It is stated that it's the duty of law enforcement officers, firefighters, paramedics, and other emergency personnel to search for the records of donor consent upon death.[5] Another significant addition to the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006 is the rule of making transplantation or therapy prioritized over research or education with an anatomical gift when a donor's wishes are unclearly stated in documentation.[3]
The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006 clarifies words written in the law that formerly were ambiguous and confusing such as: anatomical gift, record, refusal, guardian, prospective donor, reasonably available, and disinterested witness.[6][5]
The UAGA revision of 2006 makes it a felony punishable by a fine or prison to falsify, deface, or destroy organ donor documentation of another.[5]
Many states have drafted and enacted their own updated versions of the UAGA based on the revisions of 2006.[7][8]
Legislation status of UAGA in the U.S.
In the United States, all states have enacted some version of the UAGA.[7][8] States have the authority to use the Uniform Anatomical Gift Acts as a template to put additional revisions into law depending on what best fits the state's needs.[7]
| U.S. State or Territory | UAGA Legislation Version |
|---|---|
| Alabama | 2006 |
| Alaska | 2006 |
| Arizona | 2006 |
| Arkansas | 2006 |
| California | 2006 |
| Colorado | 2006 |
| Connecticut | 2010 |
| Delaware | 2015 |
| District of Columbia (D.C.) | 1968 |
| Florida | 2008 |
| Georgia | 2006 |
| Hawaii | 2006 |
| Idaho | 2006 |
| Illinois | 2006 |
| Indiana | 2006 |
| Iowa | 2006 |
| Kansas | 2006 |
| Kentucky | 2006 |
| Louisiana | 2006 |
| Maine | 2006 |
| Maryland | 2012 |
| Massachusetts | 2006 |
| Michigan | 2008 |
| Minnesota | 2006 |
| Mississippi | 2006 |
| Missouri | 2006 |
| Montana | 2006 |
| Nebraska | 2006 |
| Nevada | 2006 |
| New Hampshire | 2006 |
| New Jersey | 2006 |
| New Mexico | 2006 |
| New York | 1987 |
| North Carolina | 2006 |
| North Dakota | 2006 |
| Ohio | 2006 |
| Oklahoma | 2006 |
| Oregon | 2013 |
| Pennsylvania | 1987 |
| Puerto Rico | 2006 |
| Rhode Island | 2006 |
| South Carolina | 2006 |
| South Dakota | 2006 |
| Tennessee | 2006 |
| Texas | 2006 |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | 2006 |
| Utah | 2006 |
| Vermont | 2006 |
| Virginia | 2006 |
| Washington | 2006 |
| West Virginia | 2008 |
| Wisconsin | 2006 |
| Wyoming | 2006 |
Ethical concerns
The UAGA does not specify regulations for organ donation by a prisoner or prohibit an inmate from donating their body or an organ.[4] Christian Longo, a convicted murderer, has played a key role in rousing public debate regarding the rights of the incarcerated to become organ donors.
The retrieval of gametes from the deceased have been the subject of controversy because of the highly publicized court case In re Matter of Daniel Thomas Christy in Iowa, regarding the right to retrieve reproductive cells (posthumous sperm retrieval) from a deceased spouse or partner.[11] The argument against the retrieval of post mortem gametes in this case was that the UAGA stated the purposes of donation were for transplantation, therapy, research, or education.[11]
Since the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act was put into effect in all states, there still has been a donor shortage in the United States.[3][9][10]
Case law
- Werling v. Sandy (Ohio 1985)
See also
- Anatomical gifts
- Uniform Law Commission (ULC)
- List of Uniform Acts (United States)
- Organ donation
- Transplantation
- Gift of Life
- National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) of 1984
References
- ^ a b c d e The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017). "Anatomical Gift Act (1987)". Uniform Law Commission. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017). "Anatomical Gift (1968)". Uniform Law Commission. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017). "Anatomical Gift Act (2006)". Uniform Law Commission. Archived from the original on 13 January 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
- ^ a b c Seals Bersinger, Amanda; Milot, Lisa (2016). "Posthumous Organ Donation as Prisoner Agency and Rehabilitation". DePaul Law Review. 65 (4): 1194–1234.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Kielhorn, Kristi (2007–2008). "Giving life after death: the 2006 revision of the uniform anatomical gift act". Drake Law Review. 56 (3): 809–828 – via HeinOnline.
- ^ a b c d e Nwabueze, Remigius (2008). "Donated Organs, Property Rights and the Remedial Quagmire". Medical Law Review. 16 (2). Oxford University Press: 1–18. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn004. PMID 18413357.
- ^ a b c d e f Verheijde, Joseph; Rady, Mohamed; McGregor, Joan (2007). "The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): New challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities". Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2: 19. doi:10.1186/1747-5341-2-19. PMC 2001294. PMID 17850664 – via NCBI.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b c d "State Organ Donor Legislation". OrganDonor.Gov. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Wilding Knope, Denay (2009–2010). "Over my dead body: how the albrecht decisions complicate the constitutional dilemma of due process & the dead". Toledo Law Review. 41: 169–211 – via HeinOnline.
- ^ a b c d McIntosh, Ann (1990). "Regulating the "Gift of Life"-The 1987 Uniform Anatomical Gift Act". Washington Law Review. 65: 171–188 – via HeinOnline.
- ^ a b Spielman, Bethany (2009). "Pushing the dead into the next reproductive frontier: post mortem gamete retrieval under the uniform anatomical gift act". Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 37 (2): 331–343. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00376.x. PMID 19493077. S2CID 35736419.