Jump to content

Finnish forest reindeer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Duartefrade (talk | contribs) at 13:03, 15 September 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Finnish forest reindeer
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Cervidae
Subfamily: Capreolinae
Genus: Rangifer
Species:
R. fennicus
Subspecies:
R. f. fennicus
Trinomial name
Rangifer fennicus fennicus
(Lönnberg, 1909)

The Finnish forest reindeer (Rangifer fennicus fennicus (Finnish: metsäpeura, Russian: лесной северный олень), also known as Eurasian or European forest reindeer[1] is a rare subspecies of the reindeer native to Finland and northwestern Russia. They are found primarily in Russian Karelia and the provinces of North Karelia, Savonia and Kainuu in Finland, though some range into central south Finland. They are distinct from the semi-domesticated mountain reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in their larger size, longer legs and preference for dense boreal forest habitat, where they are rarely seen by humans, over the open tundra.[2] The Finnish herd migrates seasonally back and forth across the long Russo-Finnish border.[2]

Size

The Finnish forest reindeer is one of the largest subspecies of reindeer. It is 180–220 cm long and the tail 10–15 cm. The adult male is larger, weighing 150–250 kg, while adult females weigh about 100 kg. Their longer legs, wide hooves and narrower V-shaped antlers facilitate movement through deep snow and wooded habitats.[3]

Range and status

In the 17th century, the Finnish forest reindeer ranged throughout Finland and western Russia. Hunting, reindeer husbandry and habitat degradation through forestry led to their near complete extinction in Finland by the end of the 19th century.[3] In 1700, in Russia the population was concentrated in Kandalaksha (Kantalahti) and Lake Onega (Äänisjärvi)) but hunting and reindeer farming wiped them out in that area as well. In 1979 to 1980 they were introduced from Kainuu, Finland to middle Finland to Salamajärvi National Park. A small population of some 1,000 also thrive in Southern Ostrobothnia.[4] While their populations have been recovering in Finland, it has been suggested that an increasing, returning wolf population may be partially responsible for slowing the recovery.[5]

In 2013 Finnish and Russian researchers began a collaborative comprehensive population study using telemetry tags, collars linked to satellites to track the populations of the rare and threatened Rangifer tarandus fennicus, which is found in eastern Finland and northwest Russia. The estimates for the Finland population ranges from 850 reindeer to up to 2,000 or 3,000.[2][notes 1]

According to a census carried out by helicopter in Finland's Kainuu region this year, the population there totals 793 individuals. There are roughly 1,000 in the Suomenselkä area, with a few dozen around the towns of Ähtäri and Lieksa. Miettunen says that levels have remained quite steady in recent years.

— Alaska Dispatch, 2013

The Finnish Ministry of the Environment considers the subspecies to be Near Threatened.[6]

Ecology

Finnish forest reindeer use the Metsola Biosphere Reserve (MBR) for summer pastures, rutting and calving, while some of these animals also use this area as winter pastures. Telemetry showed that some individual migrated in winter across the Russian-Finnish border, a distance of < 50 km. They have a harem-guarding mating system (Panchenko et al. 2021),[7] that differs from the aggregated rutting, individual mate-tending, and synchronized calving system of tundra caribou.

Evolution

See Reindeer: Evolution

Reindeer originated in a late Pliocene North American-Beringian radiation of New World deer (Geist 1998).[8] A frontoparietal skull fragment of Rangifer sp. from the Early Pleistocene of Omsk, Russia dates back to 2.1-1.8 Ma and suggests northern Eurasia as a center of reindeer origin (Bondarev et al. 2017).[9] Its pedicles (antler bases), unlike modern reindeer, are inclined backward and set parallel to each other, demonstrating the primitive morphology for archaic cervids.

Van Kolfschoten et al. (2011)[10] reported fossils of reindeer in Europe from the early Middle Pleistocene of Germany, France, and England. One of the earliest fossils, an unnamed, large reindeer from Moldova

“is an archaic form of reindeer that arrived in Europe during the earlier expansion of the species. It equals in size the modern forest North American subspecies R. t caribou and R. t. terranovae... Its long metapodials [carpal and tarsal bones) with narrow epiphyses indicate adaptation to the wooded landscape” (Croitor 2010).[11]

Among the later fossil reindeer forms, Cervus [Rangifer] guettardi — large, but with relatively small teeth — originated in a small Western Europe refugium and was a likely ancestor of R. fennicus. R. geuttardi persisted into the Holocene, with dates of 11,000 and 7,200 years ago. It was apparently contemporaneous with Cervus (Rangifer) bucklandii, which was even larger than guettardi (Croitor 2018). All of these are relatively large, “primitive” forest forms that do not have the modern adaptations to grassland or to extreme cold of later types.[12]

In contrast, all known Middle and Late Pleistocene reindeer of Eurasia — except the forest forms mentioned above — share with the advanced American barren-ground caribou a peculiar specialized antler shape with the short distance between the first and second tines. One such, R. tarandus constantini, represents “an extreme adaptation of reindeer to grazing in open, dry, periglacial environments.” It dispersed westward during the last glacial maximum (21,000 – 18,000 years BP), mixed with and replaced local European reindeer forms. Its “relatively short limb bones, simple long antlers with small palmations and large cheek-teeth mark it as an open-landscape grazer.” (Croitor 2018)[12]  Its food habits may have been similar to those of the fossil reindeer from Alaska that displayed a heavy occlusal tooth wear for young and adult animals that reflects a very abrasive diet (Rivals & Solounias 2007).[13] Unlike modern reindeer, however, the volume of nasal cavity of R. tarandus constantini  was small, indicating that this Paleolithic reindeer had not yet evolved adaptations to cold air breathing (Flerov 1952).[14] R. t. constantini was followed by — and may have been an ancestor of — modern tundra reindeer that dispersed from Beringia during or after the last glacial maximum (LGM).

The above picture is one of primitive reindeer evolving in northern Eurasia in the Late Pliocene or earliest Pleistocene, spreading westward into Europe (and eastward into North America) and adapting to forests during an early Pleistocene interstadial when tundra retreated and forests expanded. When another ice age came and forests retreated, grassland- and then tundra-adapted “modern” reindeer evolved and spread throughout northern Eurasia; but the forest types, descended from geuttardi or other archaic forest forms, persisted in Western European refugia and evolved into the Eurasian forest reindeer (R. fennicus). Isolated populations then split into Finnish forest reindeer (R. f. fennicus); Siberian forest reindeer (R. f. valentinae); the narrow-nosed forest reindeer found east of Lake Baikal (R. t. angustrirostris); and the Kamchatkan reindeer (R. t. phylarchus). However, since forest and tundra reindeer do not share a direct common ancestor, they cannot be subspecies of the same species, according to the principles of phylogenetic species and subspecies definition.[15]

Taxonomy

Forest reindeer were formerly classified as a subspecies of Eurasian tundra reindeer, Rangifer tarandus fennicus. However, since they descend from different species and do not share a direct common ancestor, they cannot be the same species, according to the modern concept of species as applied to the deer family (e.g., Flagstad & Røed  (2003).[16]

It is surprising that, since 1758 when Carolus Linneaus named reindeer,[17] and naturalists and trained taxonomists since then named many species of reindeer, the Finnish forest reindeer was not described until 1909 as a subspecies of Eurasian tundra reindeer: Rangifer tarandus fennicus Lönnberg, 1909.[18] Miller Jr. (1912),[19] recognizing its consistent morphological differences from tundra reindeer—larger body, longer legs and “skull with nasal bones narrow and highly arched ; teeth relatively small”—elevated it to full species, R. fennicus. When later taxonomists named other forest reindeer in Russia as subspecies of R. fennicus because of their obvious morphological and ecological similarity as noted above under Evolution, the Finnish forest reindeer became a subspecies by monotypy: R. fennicus fennicus. Lönnberg designated the type locality as Enontekiö, Finnish Lappland, Finland.

Flerov (1933) named the Altai-Sayan forest reindeer as a subspecies of tundra reindeer, R. tarandus valentinae,[20] but Sokolov (1937)[21] brought both valentinae and the Kamchatka forest reindeer, phylarchus under R. fennicus, noting that measurements showed “no overlap in some ranges & means quite different” of the skull shape, especially the rostra (noses). Banfield (1961)[22] placed fennicus back under tundra reindeer as R. tarandus fennicus, but agreed that valentinae, phylarchus, setoni and angustirostris were forest reindeer related more to Finnish forest reindeer than to tundra types. He also included several formerly named subspecies as forest reindeer synonymous with fennicus: Tarandus rangifer buskensis Millais, 1915, T. r. yukutskensis Millais, 1915,[23] R. t. setoni Flerov, 1933,[20] R. t. silvicola Hilzheimer, 1936, R. t. transuralensis Hilzheimer, 1936, and R. t. dichotomus Hilzheimer, 1936.[24] They remain so.[25]

Neiminen et al. (1980)[26] gave measurements of a larger series of specimens, comparing them to tundra reindeer, and noted that:  

"...the long legs of the wild forest reindeer are an important adaptation to taiga conditions, where the snow cover is usually deep and soft. The mountain types [R. t. tarandus] have evolved in areas with hard-backed tundra snow, and consequently the semi-domestic reindeer [domesticated forms of R. t. tarandus] have difficulty surviving in coniferous forests, especially in winters with deep, soft snow."

Geist, 1991,[27] described “European” forest reindeer as:

“a larger, tall-legged reindeer with short, stout antlers reminiscent of barren-ground antlers, but with oval beams and a bez tine set well above the brow-tine. Woodland-type antlers as found in North American forest caribou these antlers are not! In shape they stand close to the tundra type antlers, but are more massive with some tendency for palmation.”

He described the “Altai reindeer” as similar to Finnish forest reindeer, but with “a light-coloured (sand to fox red) woodland form with a dark face and small antlers…” In a 1998 update, he named fennicus, valentinae and phylarchus as subspecies but was uncertain about the status of angustirostris.[28]

Other taxonomists have confirmed the statistically significant morphological differences of forest reindeer, especially the proportionately longer legs (e.g., Puputti and Niskanen 2009).[29]

Differences are not only in size and shape. The forest reindeer rumens have smaller papilli than do the semi-domesticated reindeer, R. tarandus, reflecting dietary differences between feeding habits consistent with different ecology (Soveri and Neiminen 2007).[30]

DNA analysis has confirmed the forest reindeer's distinctiveness and genetic distance from other reindeer types. A total of 16 mtDNA control region haplotypes (unique segments of DNA inherited in the female line) were identified in forest reindeer from Karelia and Murmansk that were unique to fennicus, and no haplotypes were completely identical to tundra reindeer (Baranova et al. 2012).[31] Kharzinova et al. (2018)[32] also “found contrasting patterns in the genetic structure” of the tundra and forest reindeer, “in accordance with their morphological and ecological difference.” She and her colleagues then sampled reindeer domesticated by the Tuva and Tofalar people of the Altai Mountains and found that these reindeer “...are tall with rather long bodies, deep chests, well-developed muscles, and are light in color.” Statistical analysis of the mtDNA “…revealed a different genetic structure of the taiga [forest] reindeer from their counterparts inhabiting the tundra.” Nei's standard genetic distance was 28.3% and the Fixation Index was 29.9% (Kharzinova et al. 2022);[33] both of these measures of distinctiveness are in the range that usually distinguish different genera of other cervids (see review in Harding, 2022).[34] These results suggest that the Tuva and Tofalar people may have domesticated Altai forest reindeer, as opposed to all other domesticated types that derived from tundra reindeer.

Genetic analysis of all wild caribou and reindeer ecotypes in the world, at the coarsest level of refinement, K = 2, clearly separated North American woodland caribou from all others;  K = 3, however, revealed a third distinctive genetic cluster in Finnish forest reindeer and PCA (principal components analysis) confirmed a distinctive Fennoscandian group apart from the Eurasia-Beringia clade. The secondary contact zone between the clusters is located in Eastern Finland, where admixture (interbreeding) was observed. This clustering and PCA analysis omitted Greenland and Svalbard reindeer, which were too different genetically to be included in the analysis (Yannic et al. 2013)[35] These considerations led to the renaming of the Finnish forest reindeer as a full species Rangifer fennicus Lönnberg, 1909, in a recent revision.[25]

WildForestReindeerLIFE project

The WildForestReindeerLIFE project in Finland started in 2016, lasting seven years. The project is coordinated by Wildlife Service Finland and co-funded by the LIFE Programme. One of its main goals is to reintroduce forest reindeer to its original habitats in Suomenselkä: National Parks of Lauhanvuori and Seitseminen were chosen as the reintroduction sites. The first animals were released in 2019.[36]

The animals moved to Suomenselkä originate from Kainuu and Finnish zoos: Korkeasaari Zoo, Ähtäri Zoo and Ranua Zoo. Zoo employees also participate in planning the daily care of the animals living in the on-site enclosures, and provide wildlife veterinarian assistance.[37]

Zoo population

There are about 150 Finnish forest reindeer in 25 European zoos. These animals have made the WildForestReindeerLIFE reintroduction project in Finland possible.[38]

The Finnish forest reindeer has been part of European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA)'s population management plan since a studbook of the species was founded in 1998. From 2020, the species was added to the EAZA Ex-situ Programme (EEP).[39] The programme coordinator works in Korkeasaari Zoo[38] in Helsinki.

Comparison with other populations of woodland reindeer globally

The boreal woodland caribou of the subspecies Rangifer caribou caribou in Canada, which are also forest-dwelling and avoid humans, are also experiencing a decline in populations and were designated as threatened in 2002 by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC).

External images
image icon A deer grazing
image icon Deer on a swamp

Notes

  1. ^ According to an article published in Alaska Dispatch in October 2013, while the wild Finnish forest reindeer are in decline, the semi-domesticated mountain reindeer, which are kept separated from the wild reindeer, have a population of at least 200,000.

References

  1. ^ "European Forest Reindeer". Highland Wildlife Park. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  2. ^ a b c "Counting elusive Finnish forest reindeer in Russian Karelia", Alaska Dispatch, Eye on the Arctic, 12 October 2013, archived from the original on 31 December 2013, retrieved 30 December 2013
  3. ^ a b "Wild Forest Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus)", Outdoors.fi (copyright Metsähallitus 2010) [1][permanent dead link‍]. Accessed 11 April 2010.
  4. ^ "Kaksi metsäpeuraa kuoli Etelä-Pohjanmaalla". Iltalehti (in Finnish). 6 June 2010. Retrieved 8 April 2012.
  5. ^ "Experts concerned about collapse of wild forest reindeer population", Helsingin Sanomat – International Edition, 11 April 2007, [2] accessed 11.04.10
  6. ^ "Metsäpeura – Rangifer tarandus fennicus". laji.fi. Ministry of the Environment. 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
  7. ^ Panchenko DV, Paasivaara A, Hyvärinen M, Krasovskij YA (2021) The wild forest reindeer, Rangifer tarandus fennicus, in the Metsola Biosphere Reserve, northwest Russia. Nature Conservation Research [Заповедная наука] 6(Suppl.1): 116-126.
  8. ^ Geist V (1998) Deer of the world: their evolution, behavior, and ecology. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, 421 pp.
  9. ^ Bondarev AA, Tesakov AS, Simakova AN, Dorogov AL (2017) Reindeer (Rangifer) from Early Pleistocene of the south of Western Siberia (in Russian). In: Bogdanov AA, others (Eds) Integrative palaeontology: development prospects for geological objectives, material of the LXIII session of the Palaeontological Society, April, 3-7, 2017. Sankt-Peterburg, 173-175.
  10. ^ van Kolfschoten T, van der Jagt I, Beeren Z, Argiti V, van der Leije J, van Essen H, Busschers FS, Stoel P, van der Plicht H ( 2011) A remarkable collection of Late Pleistocene reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) remains from Woerden (The Netherlands). , : 4-11. Quaternary International 238: 4-11.
  11. ^ Croitor R (2010) Preliminary data on reindeer fossils from the Palaeolithic site Rascov-8 (eastern Moldova) with remarks on systematics and evolution of Upper Pleistocene reindeer. Ştiinţele Naturii 1: 323-330.
  12. ^ a b Croitor R (2018) Plio-Pleistocene deer of Western Palearctic: taxonomy, systematics, phylogeny. Institute of Zoology of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova, Chișinău, 142 pp.
  13. ^ Rivals F, Solounias N (2007) Differences in tooth microwear of populations of caribou (Rangifer tarandus, Ruminantia, Mammalia) and implications to ecology, migration, glaciations and dental evolution. Journal of Mammal Evolution 14: 182-192.
  14. ^ Flerov CC (1952) Mammals: Musk deer and deer. In: Fauna of the USSR. Academy of Sciences, Moscow and Leningrad, USSR, 222-247.
  15. ^ Groves CP (2017) Phylogenetic species concept. The International Encyclopedia of Primatology: 1-2. doi:10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0044
  16. ^ Flagstad O, Røed KH (2003) Refugial origins of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 57: 658-670.
  17. ^ Linnæi [Linnæus] C (1758) Systema Naturae Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis Edition 10 Tomus 1. Vol. 1,Laurentii Salvii, Holmæi [Stockholm], 824 pp.
  18. ^ Lönnberg E (1909) Taxonomic notes about Palearctic reindeer. Arkiv för Zoologi 6: 1-17.
  19. ^ Miller Jr. GS (1912) Catalogue of the mammals of Western Europe (Europe exclusive of Russia) in the collection of the British Museum. British Museum (Natural History), London, U.K., 1019 pp.
  20. ^ a b Flerov CC (1933) Review of the Palaearctic reindeer or caribou. Journal of Mammalogy 14: 328-338. doi:10.2307/1373952
  21. ^ Sokolov II (1937) Половая, возрастная и расовая изменчивость черепа диких и домашних северных оленей [Sexual, age and racial variation of the skull of wild and domestic reindeer; in Russian, English abstract]. Soviet Reindeer Industry 9: 1-102.
  22. ^ Banfield AWF (1961) A revision of the reindeer and caribou, genus Rangifer. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 177, Biological Series No. 66, Ottawa, Ontario, 137 pp.
  23. ^ Millais JG (1915) The Asiatic reindeer and elk. In: Carruthers D, Millais JG, Wallace HF, Kennion LCRL, Barklay FG (Eds) The Gun at Home and Abroad. London & Counties Press Association Ltd., London, U.K., 216-223
  24. ^ Hilzheimer M (1936) Über drei neue Formen des Rentieres. Zeitschrift für Säugetiere-kunde [Journal for Mammals] 11: 154-158.
  25. ^ a b Harding LE (2022) Available names for Rangifer (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Cervidae) species and subspecies. ZooKeys 1119: 117-151. doi:10.3897/zookeys.1119.80233.
  26. ^ Nieminen M, Helle T (1980) Variations in body measurements of wild and semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in Fennoscandia. Annales Zoologici Fennici 17: 275-283
  27. ^ Geist V (1991) On an objective definition of subspecies, taxa as legal entities, and its application to Rangifer tarandus Lin. 1758. In: Butler CE, Mahoney SP (Eds) Proceedings 4th North American Caribou Workshop, 1989. St. John's, Newfoundland, 1-76.
  28. ^ Geist V (1998) Deer of the world: their evolution, behavior, and ecology. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, 421 pp
  29. ^ Puputti A-K, Niskanen M (2009) Identification of semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus, Linnaeus 1758) and wild forest reindeer (R t fennicus, Lönnberg 1909) from postcranial skeletal measurements. Mammalian Biology 74: 49-58.
  30. ^ Soveri T, Nieminen M (2007) Papillar morphology of the rumen of forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus) and semidomesticated reindeer (R. t. tarandus). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 36: 366-370.
  31. ^ Baranova AI, Kholodova MV, Davydov AV, Rozhkov II (2012) Polymorphism of the mtDNA control region in wild reindeer Rangifer tarandus (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) from the European part of Russia. Russian Journal of Genetics 48: 939-944.
  32. ^ Kharzinova VR, Dotsev AV, Deniskova TE, Solovieva AD, Fedorov VI, Layshev KA, Romanenko TM, Okhlopkov IM, Wimmers K, Reyer H (2018) Genetic diversity and population structure of domestic and wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L. 1758): A novel approach using BovineHD BeadChip. PloS one 13: e0207944. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207944.
  33. ^ Kharzinova VR, Dotsev AV, Solovieva AD, Shimit LD-O, Kochkarev AP, Reyer H, Zinovieva NA (2022) Genome-Wide SNP Analysis Reveals the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Domestic Reindeer Population (Rangifer tarandus) Inhabiting the Indigenous Tofalar Lands of Southern Siberia. Diversity 14: 1-13. doi:10.3390/d14110900.
  34. ^ Harding LE (2022) Genetic distance, supplementary file 2 for Harding, “Available Names for Rangifer (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Cervidae) species and subspecies”. ZooKeys 1119: 1-20.  https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/80233/download/suppl/32/
  35. ^ Yannic G, Pellissier L, Ortego J, Lecomte N, Couturier S, Cuyler C, Dussault C, Hundertmark KJ, Irvine RJ, Jenkins DA, Kolpashikov L, Mager K, Musiani M, Parker KL, Røed KH, Sipko T, Þórisson SG, V.Weckworth B, Guisan A, Bernatchez L, Côté SD (2013) Genetic diversity in caribou linked to past and future climate change. Nature Climate Change 4: 132-137. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2074.
  36. ^ "WildForestReindeerLIFE". www.suomenpeura.fi. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  37. ^ "Zoos help protect wild forest reindeer". www.suomenpeura.fi. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  38. ^ a b "Metsäpeurojen suojelua maailman eläintarhoissa koordinoidaan nyt Korkeasaaresta käsin – YouTube". www.youtube.com. Archived from the original on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  39. ^ "PROGRAMMES » EAZA". www.eaza.net. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finnish_forest_reindeer&oldid=1175497808"