Jump to content

HL v United Kingdom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Randy Kryn (talk | contribs) at 11:50, 9 December 2017 (See also: add italics). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

H.L. v. the United Kingdom
CourtEuropean Court of Justice
Decided5 October 2004
Citation45508/99 [2004] ECHR 720

In the case HL v United Kingdom (45508/99) the European Court of Human Rights found that the informal admission to a psychiatric hospital of a compliant but incapacitated adult was in contravention of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The court found that the distinction between actual and potential detention relied upon by the UK House of Lords in their ruling that HL had not been detained in R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust was not of central importance under Article 5. The European Court also held that the practice of informal admission of compliant but incapacitated adults who were de facto detained was not 'in accordance with a procedure described by law' and thus was not lawful under the Convention.[1]

The case resulted in major changes to the admission procedures for incapacitated adults to care homes and hospitals in the UK where they are, or may be, deprived of their liberty (see Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards).

See also

Notes

  1. ^ HL v. UK (2004) - App no 45508/99; 40 EHRR 761