Protoceratopsidae
| Protoceratopsidae Temporal range: Late Cretaceous,
| |
|---|---|
| |
| Protoceratops andrewsi skeleton, Carnegie Museum of Natural History | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | †Ornithischia |
| Clade: | †Neornithischia |
| Clade: | †Ceratopsia |
| Clade: | †Coronosauria |
| Family: | †Protoceratopsidae Granger & Gregory, 1923 |
| Type species | |
| †Protoceratops andrewsi Granger & Gregory, 1923
| |
| Subgroups | |
| |
Protoceratopsidae is a family within the group Ceratopsia.[1] The name Protoceratopsidae is derived from Greek for "first horned face". Protoceratopsids have so far been found in the Late Cretaceous, dating to between about 99.6 and 70.6 million years ago.[2] Although Ceratopsians have been found all over the world, protoceratopsids are only known from Asia with most specimens found in China and the Nemegt Basin in Mongolia.[1] As Ceratopsians, protoceratopsids were herbivorous, with constantly replacing tooth batteries made for slicing through plants and a hooked beak for grabbing them. Protoceratopsids were relatively small, between 1-2.5 m in length from head to tail.[3] Their bony frill and horns were much smaller than more derived members of Ceratopsia.[4] Protoceratopsids were likely slow runners and tended to move at a walk or a trot.[3] Their legs may have been straight, creating an upright posture, but there are some theories that they were splayed out to the side, contributing to their slowness.[5] There is evidence that Protoceratops formed groups. Specimens of juveniles and young adults are often found in groups, although adults tend to be solitary. The nature of these groups is not completely known, though herds of young likely formed for protection from predators, and adults are believed to have come together for communal nesting.[6]
Phylogeny
The taxon Protoceratopsidae was introduced by Walter W. Granger and William King Gregory in May 1923 as a monotypic family for Protoceratops andrewsi. Granger and Gregory recognized Protoceratops''s close relationship to other Ceratopsia, but considered it primitive enough to warrant its own family, and perhaps suborder. Protoceratopsidae was later expanded to include all ceratopsians that were too advanced to be psittacosaurids, but too primitive to be ceratopsids. In 1998, Paul Sereno defined Protoceratopsidae as the stem-based clade including "all coronosaurs closer to Protoceratops than to Triceratops". Sereno's definition ensures that Protoceratopsidae is monophyletic, but probably excludes some dinosaurs that have been traditionally thought of as protoceratopsids (for example, Leptoceratops and Montanoceratops). The latter genera are now often classified in a mostly North American family Leptoceratopsidae.
Sereno (2000) included three genera in Protoceratopsidae: Protoceratops, Bagaceratops, and Graciliceratops. Derived characters shared by these dinosaurs include a narrow strap-shaped paroccipital process, a very small occipital condyle, and an upturned dorsal margin of the predentary. In Protoceratops and Bagaceratops (and also in the non-protoceratopsid Leptoceratops), there is a blade-shaped parietal sagittal crest (Sereno 2000: 505). Several other more recently recognized genera may also be protoceratopsids. In 2003, Vladimir Alifanov named, but did not define, a new ceratopsian family Bagaceratopidae to include Bagaceratops, Platyceratops, Lamaceratops and Breviceratops. However, applying Sereno's phylogenetic definition, Alifanov's Bagaceratopidae appears to be a subclade of Protoceratopsidae.
Physiology
Anatomy
Protoceratopsidae has a frill and rostral bone characteristic of all ceratopsians. Their snout is particularly wedge-shaped with tall and narrow nostrils situated high on it. The antorbital fenestra is unusually small, and the antorbital fossa sits high on the skull with a slit connecting it to a sinus in the maxilla. This sinus is unique to Protoceratopsidae. Protoceratopsids may have had cheeks to hold food in their mouths.[7] They have very well-defined maxillary and dentary ridges where the muscles in the cheek would have connected, and a number of foramina dotted the maxilla which allowed branches from the trigimenal nerve to reach the tissues attached to the maxilla, indicating that such tissues were likely muscular.9[8] The end of the upper jaw was likely not fleshy but instead covered by a horn-like material, and the upper and lower jaws curved in towards each other. Compared to more derived ceratopsians, protoceratopsids had a deep and wide oral cavity, though more narrow than predecessors like Psittacosaurus, which may have aided in breathing or thermoregulation. The nasal cavity which was ancestrally one large cavity was split into two within Protoceratopsidae by the hard palate. This splitting likely happened to accommodate the deeper oral cavity.[7]
The vertebral column of protoceratopsids was S-shaped, and the vertebrae had unusually long neural spines, with spines on caudal vertebrae that were five times as tall as the centrum.[3] The neural spines on the caudal vertebrae were longer in the middle of the tail than at the base, increasing the tail's height and flattening it. The middle of the tail was rigid and straight. The entire tail was quite horizontally flexible, but vertical movement was limited.[9] The neck had limited mobility, especially in the lateral direction. The neck allowed individuals to bend their necks up and down so that they could reach food.[3]
Within Protoceratopsidae, Protoceratops has an unusually large eye based on the size of the sclerotic ring. Within birds, a medium-sized sclerotic ring indicates that the animal is a predator, a large sclerotic ring indicates that it is nocturnal, and the largest ring size indicates it is a nocturnal predator. Eye size is an important adaptation within predators and nocturnal animals because a larger eye has increased sensitivity and resolution. Because of the energy necessary to maintain a larger eye and the weakness of the skull that corresponds with a larger orbital, Nick Longrich argues that this structure must have been an adaptation. Protoceratops’ mouth structures and general abundance indicate it was not a predator, so if it were also diurnal then it should have a much smaller sclerotic ring size. Its large eyes were adapted for something and may have been an indication of a nocturnal lifestyle.[1]
Sexual Dimorphism
Protoceratopsids are generally accepted as being sexually dimorphic, with differences in the width and height of the skull and the frill that covers the neck.[1][4] This frill was likely used in mating displays. A larger frill gave an advantage in head-pushing competitions in which individuals would push against each other's heads to display dominance. The frill may have been brightly colored and used in head-bobbing displays similar to modern-day iguanas and chameleons to attract a mate.[1] Leonardo Maiorino and his team used geometric morphometrics to analyze the dimorphism in Protoceratops andrewsi and concluded that there is no difference in male and female structures.[4] Alternatively, Dodson's analysis of structure sizes in large Protoceratops found that they were dimorphic. The length and width of the frill, parietal fenestra, and external nares, the nasal height, the skull width, the orbit height, and the coronoid process height all varied with sex.[10]
Growth
There are three phases in the life cycle of a protoceratopsid: juvenile, subadult, and adult. Juveniles are roughly one third the size of an adult and have an underdeveloped frill and nasal bump. They have not developed epijugals. Nests containing juveniles have been found indicating that they received some level of parental care.[11] In the subadult stage, individuals are two thirds the size of an adult, and the frill and quadrates grow wider. The epijugal begins forming. As an adult, the frill becomes even larger, the epijugal is fully formed, and a small nasal horn develops.[4]
Environment
Protoceratops likely lived in deserts. Specimens are often found in sandstones. Because the posture of some animals is preserved, it is likely that they were buried during a sandstorm or a dune collapse.[4] If Protoceratops was nocturnal, it could avoid the hottest parts of the day and survive in an arid environment without highly developed cooling mechanisms.[1] On the other hand, Tereschenko proposed that Protoceratopsids were actually aquatic, using their laterally-flattened tails as a paddle to aid in swimming. According to Tereschenko, Bagaceratops was fully aquatic while Protoceratops was only partially aquatic.[3]
Biogeography
Ceratopsians originated in Asia and had two major dispersal events. The first was the migration of Leptoceratopsidae's ancestor through Europe and into North America. The second dispersal was 15 million years later, this time of Ceratopsidae's ancestors across the Bering Land Bridge into North America between 120Ma and 140Ma. Protoceratopsids are found in Asia but not North America.[1]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f g Ralrick, Patricia; Currie, Philip; Eberth, David; Ryan, Michael; Chinnery-Allgeier, Brenda (2010). New Perspectives on Horned Dinosaurs : The Royal Tyrrell Museum Ceratopsian Symposium. Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780253353580.
- ^ Holtz, Thomas R. Jr. (2011) Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-Date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages, Winter 2010 Appendix.
- ^ a b c d e Tereschhenko, V (2008). "Adaptive Features of Protoceratopsids (Ornithischia: Neoceratopsia)". Paleontological Journal. 42 (3): 50–64. doi:10.1134/S003103010803009X.
- ^ a b c d e Maiorino, Leonardo; Farke, Andrew A.; Kotsakis, Tassos; Piras, Paolo (7 May 2015). "Males Resemble Females: Re-Evaluating Sexual Dimorphism in Protoceratops andrewsi (Neoceratopsia, Protoceratopsidae)". PLOS ONE. pp. e0126464. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126464. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Fastovsky, David; Weishampel, David. "Dinosaurs A Concise Natural History". New York: Cambridge University Press: 118–133. ISBN 978-0-521-71902-5.
- ^ Hone, David W. E.; Farke, Andrew A.; Watabe, Mahito; Shigeru, Suzuki; Tsogtbaatar, Khishigjav (26 November 2014). "A New Mass Mortality of Juvenile Protoceratops and Size-Segregated Aggregation Behaviour in Juvenile Non-Avian Dinosaurs". PLOS ONE. pp. e113306. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113306. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b Osmolska, Halszka (1986). "STRUCTURE OF NASAL AND ORAL CAVITIES IN THE PROTOCERATOPSID DINOSAURS (CERATOPSIA, ORNITHISCHIA)". Paleontologica. 31 (1–2): 145–157.
- ^ Galton, P.M. (2007). "The cheeks of ornithischian dinosaurs". Lethaia. 6 (1): 67–89. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1973.tb00873.x.
- ^ Tereschenko, V.; Singer, T (2013). "Structural Features of Neural Spines of the Caudal Vertebrae of Protoceratopoids (Ornithischia: Neoceratopsia)". Paleontological Journal. 47 (6): 618–630. doi:10.1134/S0031030113060105.
- ^ Dodson, Peter (1976). "Quantitative Aspects of Relative Growth and Sexual Dimorphism in Protoceratops". Journal of Paleontology. 50 (5): 929–940. ISSN 1937-2337.
- ^ Fastovsky, D.E.; Weishampel, D.B.; Watabe, M.; Barsbold, R.; Tsogtbaatar, K.H.; Narmandakh, P. (2011). "A NEST OF PROTOCERATOPS ANDREWSI (DINOSAURIA, ORNITHISCHIA)". Journal of Paleontology. 85 (6): 1035–1041. JSTOR 41409110.
- Alifanov, V.R., 2003. Two new dinosaurs of the Infraorder Neoceratopsia (Ornithischia) from the Upper Cretaceous of the Nemegt Depression, Mongolian People's Republic. Paleontological Journal 37 (5): 524-535.
- Granger, W. & W.K. Gregory, 1923. Protoceratops andrewsi, a pre-ceratopsian dinosaur from Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 72: 1-9.
- Sereno, P.C., 1998. A rationale for phylogenetic definitions, with application to the higher-level taxonomy of Dinosauria. N. Jb. Geol. Palaont. Abh. 210 (1): 41-83.
- Sereno, P.C., 2000. The fossil record, systematics and evolution of pachycephalosaurs and ceratopsians from Asia. 480-516 in Benton, M.J., M.A. Shishkin, D.M. Unwin & E.N. Kurochkin (eds.), The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
.png)
