Jump to content

Reduct

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.112.186.110 (talk) at 14:56, 13 September 2020 (Structures in universal algebra are not exactly the same as structures in model theory, so the word 'equivalently' seems unwarranted.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In universal algebra and in model theory, a reduct of an algebraic structure is obtained by omitting some of the operations and relations of that structure. The converse of "reduct" is "expansion."

Definition

Let A be an algebraic structure (in the sense of universal algebra) or a structure in the sense of model theory, organized as a set X together with an indexed family of operations and relations φi on that set, with index set I. Then the reduct of A defined by a subset J of I is the structure consisting of the set X and J-indexed family of operations and relations whose j-th operation or relation for jJ is the j-th operation or relation of A. That is, this reduct is the structure A with the omission of those operations and relations φi for which i is not in J.

A structure A is an expansion of B just when B is a reduct of A. That is, reduct and expansion are mutual converses.

Examples

The monoid (Z, +, 0) of integers under addition is a reduct of the group (Z, +, −, 0) of integers under addition and negation, obtained by omitting negation. By contrast, the monoid (N,+,0) of natural numbers under addition is not the reduct of any group.

Conversely the group (Z, +, −, 0) is the expansion of the monoid (Z, +, 0), expanding it with the operation of negation.

References

  • Burris, Stanley N.; H. P. Sankappanavar (1981). A Course in Universal Algebra. Springer. ISBN 3-540-90578-2.
  • Hodges, Wilfrid (1993). Model theory. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30442-3.