Jump to content

Death on a Factory Farm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scorpions13256 (talk | contribs) at 18:03, 10 November 2020 (Copying from Category:2009 television films to Category:2009 films non-diffusing subcategory using Cat-a-lot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Death on a Factory Farm
Directed byTom Simon
Sarah Teale[1]
Theme music composerJamie Lawrence
Country of originUnited States
Original languageEnglish
Production
ProducersTom Simon
Sarah Teale
EditorGeof Bartz[2]
Running time83 minutes
Original release
NetworkHBO
Release
  • March 16, 2009 (2009-03-16)

Death on a Factory Farm is a 2009 television documentary film concerning the animal rights abuses at the Wiles hog farm, and the subsequent investigation and trial.

Synopsis

Death on a Factory Farm follows the undercover investigation of Wiles Hog Farm by the animal rights group The Humane Farming Association (HFA), and the resulting court case against it. The organization received a tip from an employee at the farm that animals were being abused, including a claim that hogs were being hung by chains and strangled to death as a form of euthanasia. HFA then turned to an undercover investigator using the name "Pete". The investigator wore a hidden camera while he worked undercover as a farmhand at Wiles.

Over the course of six weeks, the investigator secretly filmed numerous incriminating scenes, including piglets being tossed into crates from across a room, impregnated sows held in pens impeded their ability to move, an unhealthy piglet being hit against a wall to euthanize it, and a sick sow being hung by a chain from a forklift until it choked to death. Having obtained this evidence, Pete concluded the investigation and quit the job at the farm.

HFA brought Pete's footage to the Wayne County Sheriff's Department, which then raided the farm. Prosecutors filed ten criminal charges of animal cruelty against the farm's owners, and a farm employee who participated in hanging the sow.

In the subsequent trial, the prosecutors and the defense fought about the legality and morality of these practices, described by the presiding judge as "distasteful and offensive". However, the judge defended these practices as the reality of producing pork for consumption.[2]

References