From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Acrasia" redirects here. For other uses, see Acrasia (disambiguation).

Akrasia (/əˈkrzɪə/; Greek ἀκρασία, "lacking command"), occasionally transliterated as acrasia or Anglicised as acrasy or acracy, is described as a lack of self-control or the state of acting against one's better judgement. The adjectival form is "akratic".[1]

Classical approaches[edit]

Portrait in marble of Socrates, who was an early investigator of akrasia

The problem goes back at least as far as Plato. Socrates (in Plato's Protagoras) asks precisely how this is possible—if one judges action A to be the best course of action, why would one do anything other than A?

In the dialogue Protagoras, Socrates attests that akrasia does not exist, claiming “No one goes willingly toward the bad” (358d). If a person examines a situation and decides to act in the way he determines to be best, he will actively pursue this action, as the best course is also the good course, i.e. man's natural goal. An all-things-considered assessment of the situation will bring full knowledge of a decision's outcome and worth linked to well-developed principles of the good. A person, according to Socrates, never chooses to act poorly or against his better judgment; actions that go against what is best are only a product of being ignorant of facts or knowledge of what is best or good.

Aristotle on the other hand took a more empirical approach to the question, acknowledging that we intuitively believe in akrasia. He distances himself from the Socratic position by locating the breakdown of reasoning in an agent’s opinion, not his appetition. Now, without recourse to appetitive desires, Aristotle reasons that akrasia occurs as a result of opinion. Opinion is formulated mentally in a way that may or may not imitate truth, while appetites are merely desires of the body. Thus opinion is only incidentally aligned with or opposed to the good, making an akratic action the product of opinion instead of reason. For Aristotle, the antonym of akrasia is enkrateia, which means "in power" (over oneself).[2]

The word akrasia occurs twice in the Koine Greek New Testament. In Matthew 23:25 Jesus uses it to describe hypocritical religious leaders. The Apostle Paul also gives the threat of temptation through akrasia as a reason for a husband and wife to not deprive each other of sex (1 Corinthians 7:5).

In Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene, book II, Acrasia, the embodiment of intemperance dwelling in the "Bower of Bliss", had the Circe-like capacity of transforming her lovers into monstrous animal shapes.

Contemporary approaches[edit]

Donald Davidson (1969/1980) attempted to solve the problem by first criticizing earlier thinkers who wanted to limit the scope of akrasia to agents who despite having reached a rational decision were somehow swerved off their “desired” tracks. Indeed, Davidson expands akrasia to include any judgment that is reached but not fulfilled, whether it be as a result of an opinion, a real or imagined good, or a moral belief. “[T]he puzzle I shall discuss depends only on the attitude or belief of the agent…my subject concerns evaluative judgments, whether they are analyzed cognitively, prescriptively, or otherwise.” Thus he expands akrasia to include cases in which the agent seeks to fulfill desires, for example, but ends up denying himself the pleasure he has deemed most choice-worthy.

Davidson sees the problem as one of reconciling the following apparently inconsistent triad:

  • If an agent believes A to be better than B, then they want to do A more than B.
  • If an agent wants to do A more than B, then they will do A rather than B if they only do one.
  • Sometimes an agent acts against their better judgment.

Davidson solves the problem by saying that, when people act in this way, they temporarily believe that the worse course of action is better, because they have not made an all-things-considered judgment, but only a judgment based on a subset of possible considerations.

Another contemporary philosopher, Amélie Rorty (1980) has tackled the problem by distilling out akrasia's many forms. She contends that akrasia is manifested in different stages of the practical reasoning process. She enumerates four types of akrasia: akrasia of direction or aim, of interpretation, of irrationality, and of character. She separates the practical reasoning process into four steps, showing the breakdown that may occur between each step and how each constitutes an akratic state.

Another explanation is that there are different forms of motivation which can conflict with each other. Throughout the ages, many have identified a conflict between reason and emotion, which might make it possible to believe that one should do A rather than B, but still end up wanting to do B more than A.

Psychologist George Ainslie argues that akrasia results from the empirically verified phenomenon of hyperbolic discounting, which causes us to make different judgements close to a reward than we will when further from it.[3]

Weakness of will[edit]

Richard Holton (1999), argues that weakness of the will involves revising one's resolutions too easily. Under this view, it is possible to act against one's better judgment (that is, be akratic), but without being weak-willed. Suppose, for example, Sarah judges that taking revenge upon a murderer is not the best course of action, but makes the resolution to take the revenge anyway and sticks to that resolution. According to Holton, Sarah behaves akratically but does not show weakness of will.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Although this philosopher's technical term is usually employed in its Greek form (i.e., akrasia/akratic) in English texts, it was once the philosophers' English language convention to use the precise English equivalent of akrasia/akratic, incontinence/incontinent. However, it now seems that the correct, widely established convention is to use the term akrasia.
  2. ^ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/#Akr
  3. ^ Ainslie, George. "Picoeconomics". Archived from the original on 27 April 2009. Retrieved 2009-03-27. 


  • Adler, J.E. (July 2002). "Akratic Believing?". Philosophical Studies. 110 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1023/A:1019823330245. 
  • Arpaly, N. (April 2000). "On Acting Rationally against One's Best Judgement". Ethics. 110 (3): 488–513. doi:10.1086/233321. 
  • Arpaly, N.; Schroeder, T. (February 1999). "Praise, Blame and the Whole Self". Philosophical Studies. 93 (2): 161–188. doi:10.1023/A:1004222928272. 
  • Audi, R. (May 1979). "Weakness of Will and Practical Judgment". Noûs. 13 (2): 173–196. doi:10.2307/2214396. 
  • Bovens, L. (October 1999). "The Two Faces of Akratics Anonymous". Analysis. 59 (4): 230–6. doi:10.1111/1467-8284.00174. 
  • Cameron, M.E. (1997). "Akrasia, AIDS, and Virtue Ethics". Journal of Nursing Law. 4 (1): 21–33. PMID 12545981. 
  • Campbell, P.G. (June 2000). "Diagnosing Agency". Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology. 7 (2): 107–119. 
  • Chan, D.K. (April 1995). "Non-Intentional Actions". American Philosophical Quarterly. 32 (2): 139–151. 
  • Davidson, D. (1980) [Essay first published 1969]. "How is Weakness of the Will Possible?". Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 21–42. ISBN 0-19-924626-2. 
  • Gilead, A. (September 1999). "How is Akrasia Possible After All?". Ratio. 12 (3): 257–270. doi:10.1111/1467-9329.00091. 
  • Haggard, P.; Cartledge, P.; Dafydd, M.; Oakley, D.A. (September 2004). "Anomalous Control: When 'Free-Will' is not Conscious". Consciousness and Cognition. 13 (3): 646–654. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.001. PMID 15336254. 
  • Haji, I. (Fall 1996). "Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Induced Pro-Attitudes". Dialogue. 35 (4): 703–720. doi:10.1017/S0012217300008581. 
  • Hardcastle, V.G. (2003). "Life at the Borders: Habits, Addictions and Self-Control". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. 15 (2): 243–253. doi:10.1080/0952813021000055612. 
  • Hartmann, D. (May 2004). "Neurophysiology and Freedom of the Will". Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science. 2 (4): 275–284. doi:10.1007/s10202-003-0056-z. 
  • Harwood, Sterling (1992). "For an Amoral, Dispositional Account of Weakness of Will". Auslegung. 18 (1): 27–38.  reprinted in Harwood, Sterling, ed. (1996). Business as Ethical and Business as Usual. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. pp. 378–384. 
  • Henry, D. (September 2002). "Aristotle on Pleasure and the Worst Form of Akrasia, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice". 5 (3): 255–270. 
  • Hodgson, D. (January 2005). "Plain Person's Free Will". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 12 (1): 3–19. 
  • Holton, R. (May 1999). "Intention and Weakness of Will" (PDF). The Journal of Philosophy. 96 (5): 241–262. doi:10.2307/2564667. JSTOR 2564667. 
  • Hookway, C. (2001). "Epistemic Akrasia and Epistemic Virtue". In Fairweather, A.; Zagzebski, L. Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 178–199. 
  • Jiang, X.-Y. (April 2000). "What Kind of Knowledge Does a Weak-Willed Person Have? — A Comparative Study of Aristotle and the Ch'eng-Chu School". Philosophy East & West. 50 (2): 242–253. 
  • Joyce, R. (1995). "Early Stoicism and Akrasia". Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy. 40 (3): 315–335. doi:10.1163/156852895321051874. 
  • Martin, M.W. (June 1999). "Alcoholism as Sickness and Wrongdoing". Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 29 (2): 109–131. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00094. 
  • Mele, A.R. (September 1992). "Akrasia, Self-Control, and Second-Order Desires". Noûs. 26 (3): 281–302. doi:10.2307/2215955. 
  • Mele, A.R. (December 1989). "Akratic Feelings". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 50 (2): 277–288. doi:10.2307/2107960. JSTOR 2107960. 
  • Mele, A.R. (April 1986). "Incontinent Believing". Philosophical Quarterly. 36 (143): 212–222. doi:10.2307/2219769. JSTOR 2219769. 
  • Mele, A.R. (June 1986). "Is Akratic Action Unfree?". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 46 (4): 673–679. doi:10.2307/2107677. JSTOR 2107677. 
  • Mele, A.R. (March 1997). "Real Self-Deception". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 20 (1): 91–102. doi:10.1017/s0140525x97000034. PMID 10096996. 
  • Metcalfe, J.; Mischel, W. (January 1999). "A Hot/Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower". Psychological Review. 106 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3. PMID 10197361. 
  • Owens, D. (July 2002). "Epistemic Akrasia". The Monist. 85 (3): 381–397. doi:10.5840/monist200285316. 
  • Peijnenburg, J. (2000). "Akrasia, Dispositions and Degrees". Erkenntnis. 53 (3): 285–308. doi:10.1023/A:1026563930319. 
  • Rorty, A.O. (1998). "Political Sources of Emotions: Greed and Anger". Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 22: 21–33. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1998.tb00329.x. 
  • Rorty, A.O. (July 1997). "The Social and Political Sources of Akrasia". Ethics. 107 (4): 644–657. doi:10.1086/233763. 
  • Rorty, A.O. (1980). "Where Does the Akratic Break Take Place?". Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 58: 333–46. doi:10.1080/00048408012341341. 
  • Santas, G. (1969). "Aristotle on Practical Inference, the Explanation of Action, and Akrasia". Phronesis. 14: 162–189. doi:10.1163/156852869X00118. 
  • Santas, G. (January 1966). "Plato's Protagoras and Explanations of Weakness". The Philosophical Review. 75 (1): 3–33. doi:10.2307/2183590. JSTOR 2183590. 
  • Schorsch, A.J. (1992). Housing Policy and Common Sense: An Inquiry and a Method (PDF) (Thesis/Dissertation ed.). University of Illinois at Chicago. pp. 85–90. 
  • Searle, J.R. (2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-19463-5. 
  • Shand, A.F. (October 1895). "Attention and Will: A Study in Involuntary Action". Mind. 4 (16): 450–471. doi:10.1093/mind/os-4.15.450. 
  • Stroud, Sarah (2008). "Weakness of Will". In Zalta, Edward N. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall ed.). 
  • Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-62300-6. 
  • Walker, A.F. (December 1989). "The Problem of Weakness of Will". Noûs. 23 (5): 653–676. doi:10.2307/2216006. 
  • Wallace, R.J. (1999). "Three Conceptions of Rational Agency". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2 (3): 217–242. doi:10.1023/A:1009946911117. 
  • Wegner, D.M. (1994). "Ironic Processes of Mental Control". Psychological Review. 101 (1): 44–52. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.1.34. 
  • Wegner, D.M. (2002). The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-23222-7. 
  • Wegner, D.M.; Wheatley, T. (July 1999). "Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Experience of Will". American Psychologist. 54 (7): 480–492. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.480. PMID 10424155. 
  • Williams, B. (1990). "Voluntary Acts and Responsible Agents". Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 10 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1093/ojls/10.1.1. 
  • Zheng, Y.J. (June 2001). "Akrasia, Picoeconomics, and a Rational Reconstruction of Judgment Formation in Dynamic Choice". Philosophical Studies. 104 (3): 227–251. doi:10.1023/A:1010361710316. 

External links[edit]