Jump to content

Auckland Harbour Board v Commissioner of Inland Revenue

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Good Olfactory (talk | contribs) at 04:10, 30 March 2016 (Commissioner of Inland Revenue). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Auckland Harbour Board v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
CourtPrivy Council
Full case nameAuckland Harbour Board v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Decided24 January 2001
Citation[1999] NZCA 225; (1999) 19 NZTC 15,433
TranscriptCourt of Appeal judgment Privy Council ruling
Court membership
Judges sittingLord Steyn, Lord Hoffman, Lord Cooke of Thorndon, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough

Auckland Harbour Board v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [1999] NZCA 225; (1999) 19 NZTC 15,433 is a prominent case in New Zealand tax law regarding the issue of tax avoidance.[1]

References

  1. ^ Alley, Clinton; Chan, Carrol; Dunbar, David; Gupta, Ranjana; Hodson, Alister; Holmes, Kevin; Keating, Mark; Maples, Andrew; Mason, Scott; Katherine=, Ritchie (2009). New Zealand Taxation 2009 - Principles, Cases and Questions (2009 ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN 978-0-86472-656-8.
Stub icon

This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Auckland_Harbour_Board_v_Commissioner_of_Inland_Revenue&oldid=712616990"