Battle of Fleurus (1690): Revision history

7 April 2024

• curprev 18:2918:29, 7 April 2024‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 18,850 bytes −98‎ there were only troops in Dutch and Spanish pay undo

7 February 2024

• curprev 19:4719:47, 7 February 2024‎ Jules Agathias talk contribs‎ 18,948 bytes +84‎ Replaced Netherlands by Flanders + wording undo

21 January 2024

• curprev 20:2620:26, 21 January 2024‎ Buidhe talk contribs‎ m 18,864 bytes −10‎ Disambiguating links to Mons (link changed to Mons, Belgium) using DisamAssist. undo
• curprev 19:4719:47, 21 January 2024‎ Buidhe talk contribs‎ m 18,874 bytes +24‎ Disambiguating links to Mons (help needed) using DisamAssist. undo

14 November 2023

• curprev 00:2800:28, 14 November 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 18,850 bytes −25‎ →‎Aftermath undo

8 November 2023

• curprev 11:4211:42, 8 November 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 18,875 bytes +433‎ No edit summary undo

29 October 2023

• curprev 22:3622:36, 29 October 2023‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 18,442 bytes −65‎ Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine undo

17 October 2023

• curprev 19:2719:27, 17 October 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 18,507 bytes +14‎ No edit summary undo

2 October 2023

• curprev 18:5918:59, 2 October 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ m 18,493 bytes −2‎ →‎Aftermath undo
• curprev 16:5516:55, 2 October 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 18,495 bytes +17‎ →‎Aftermath undo

2 September 2023

• curprev 13:2713:27, 2 September 2023‎ ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs‎ 18,478 bytes 0‎ Resolving Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. To match date in cite undo
• curprev 13:1013:10, 2 September 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 18,478 bytes +10‎ →‎Aftermath undo
• curprev 13:0813:08, 2 September 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 18,468 bytes +551‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 12:5312:53, 2 September 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 17,917 bytes +14‎ 35,000 troops for the French and 38,000 for the allies is not representative for the literature. Many argue that the French significantly outnumbered the allies undo
• curprev 12:4912:49, 2 September 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 17,903 bytes +722‎ other casualty figures included in article undo Tag: harv-error
• curprev 12:2812:28, 2 September 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 17,181 bytes +38‎ Stapleton's casualty figure undo

23 August 2023

• curprev 17:0017:00, 23 August 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 17,143 bytes +29‎ →‎Battle: This seems to make sense to include undo

18 August 2023

• curprev 18:1618:16, 18 August 2023‎ Robinvp11 talk contribs‎ 17,114 bytes +21‎ →‎Background: Strength needs a precise number; undo
• curprev 18:0918:09, 18 August 2023‎ Robinvp11 talk contribs‎ 17,093 bytes +4‎ Wording, links, clean up undo
• curprev 10:3910:39, 18 August 2023‎ Robinvp11 talk contribs‎ 17,089 bytes −196‎ Lead should avoid NPOV words like "Brilliant", "French victory" doesn't appear to be controversial so no need for reference to confirm. wording undo

17 August 2023

• curprev 23:3123:31, 17 August 2023‎ Jules Agathias talk contribs‎ 17,285 bytes +695‎ Bodart is a complete outlier in regard to the strength of the respective armies; found no other source to corroborate 50,000 men on the French side. Reworded the lead and battle sections to better reflect the lack of consensus. Quite a few statements in the body which are nowhere to be seen in Van Nimwegen's book (despite it being linked as the source material) will have to be adressed. undo

5 August 2023

• curprev 20:4920:49, 5 August 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 16,590 bytes +4‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:4920:49, 5 August 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ m 16,586 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:4920:49, 5 August 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 16,585 bytes +30‎ Don't know why Bodart is used selectively undo

30 June 2023

• curprev 22:1022:10, 30 June 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 16,555 bytes +117‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:0422:04, 30 June 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 16,438 bytes −27‎ →‎Aftermath: Various historians claim that both sides lost 7,000 killed and wounded, so don't know why this would be dubious. I will have the source again in a few days. I can than show what Wijn exacly wrote. undo

28 June 2023

• curprev 03:4303:43, 28 June 2023‎ WikiCleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 16,465 bytes 0‎ v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tag: WPCleaner

22 June 2023

• curprev 23:0423:04, 22 June 2023‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 16,465 bytes +15‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Dubious}} undo
• curprev 21:0321:03, 22 June 2023‎ LaHire07 talk contribs‎ 16,450 bytes +11‎ It's about the first part of the sentence, not the second. Sorry if that wasn't clear. undo
• curprev 20:4220:42, 22 June 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 16,439 bytes −11‎ Undid revision 1161452717 by LaHire07 (talk) Even if Waldeckost more killed and wounded it doesn't mean that the French army was in a better shape than the allied army. The Allies were better in replacing losses and got reinforcements. Lets take it to the talk page undo Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
• curprev 20:3120:31, 22 June 2023‎ LaHire07 talk contribs‎ 16,450 bytes +583‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:1920:19, 22 June 2023‎ LaHire07 talk contribs‎ 15,867 bytes +11‎ Undid revision 1161439149 by DavidDijkgraaf (talk) It is dubious because the Dutch have lost more killed or wounded according to most sources, and Waldeck lost half his army, and that sentence looks very much like an assertion. undo Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
• curprev 18:2818:28, 22 June 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 15,856 bytes −11‎ Undid revision 1161424968 by LaHire07 (talk) Why is this dubious? undo Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
• curprev 16:3016:30, 22 June 2023‎ LaHire07 talk contribs‎ 15,867 bytes +11‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

13 June 2023

• curprev 17:4317:43, 13 June 2023‎ LaHire07 talk contribs‎ m 15,856 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 17:4217:42, 13 June 2023‎ LaHire07 talk contribs‎ 15,857 bytes +9‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 17:3917:39, 13 June 2023‎ LaHire07 talk contribs‎ 15,848 bytes −2‎ No edit summary undo

16 May 2023

• curprev 14:4614:46, 16 May 2023‎ 145.224.83.80 talk‎ 15,850 bytes −2‎ →‎Background: Replaced manual conversion of distance from SI units to Imperial with automatic conversion undo

16 April 2023

• curprev 17:1917:19, 16 April 2023‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ m 15,852 bytes +2‎ Copyedit (minor) undo
• curprev 17:1617:16, 16 April 2023‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ 15,850 bytes +11‎ Cleaned up using AutoEd undo

2 April 2023

• curprev 21:1921:19, 2 April 2023‎ Robinvp11 talk contribs‎ 15,839 bytes −115‎ Flow, wording (need more citations) undo
• curprev 21:0921:09, 2 April 2023‎ Robinvp11 talk contribs‎ 15,954 bytes −728‎ →‎Background: clean up; the detail about French forces in other theatres isn't relevant to this article (unless I'm missing something) undo

1 April 2023

• curprev 14:3114:31, 1 April 2023‎ Waylon1104 talk contribs‎ 16,682 bytes +181‎ Wikipedia:Citation overkill undo
• curprev 12:0512:05, 1 April 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 16,501 bytes +352‎ No edit summary undo

10 March 2023

• curprev 12:0212:02, 10 March 2023‎ Marcocapelle talk contribs‎ 16,149 bytes −15‎ →‎References: More specific categorization undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

20 February 2023

• curprev 15:2715:27, 20 February 2023‎ Robinvp11 talk contribs‎ 16,164 bytes −566‎ Lead; simplify Casualties (we should be aiming for general consensus in the Infobox, not seeking to include every calculation - put it in the article body if needed undo
• curprev 15:1215:12, 20 February 2023‎ Robinvp11 talk contribs‎ 16,730 bytes −372‎ Not clear what "putting and under contribution" means - I assume levying taxes but is that really significant enough to be in the Lead? undo

5 February 2023

• curprev 01:3001:30, 5 February 2023‎ DavidDijkgraaf talk contribs‎ 17,102 bytes +2‎ Undid revision 1137512540 by Waylon1104 (talk) It makes more sense to list them from low estimates to bigger estimates, than by the nationality of the historians undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 01:0401:04, 5 February 2023‎ Waylon1104 talk contribs‎ 17,100 bytes +1‎ french and Austrians, while 30,000 only wrote by Dutch undo
• curprev 01:0301:03, 5 February 2023‎ Waylon1104 talk contribs‎ 17,099 bytes −2‎ the sources which gave 38,000 were wrote by american\ undo Tag: Reverted