Battle of Glasgow, Missouri
Battle of Glasgow | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the American Civil War | |||||||||
The route of Price's Missouri Expedition. | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Belligerents | |||||||||
United States (Union) | CSA (Confederacy) | ||||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
Chester Harding, Jr. |
John Bullock Clark, Jr., Joe Shelby | ||||||||
Strength | |||||||||
800 | 1,500–1,800 | ||||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||||
50 [1] to 400 | 50 [1] |
The Battle of Glasgow was fought on October 15, 1864, in and near Glasgow, Missouri as part of Price's Missouri Expedition during the American Civil War. Although the battle resulted in a Confederate victory and the capture of significant war material, it had little long-term benefit as Price was ultimately defeated at Westport a week later, bringing his campaign in Missouri to an end.[1]
Background
The battle of Glasgow was a part of Price's Missouri Expedition,[2] a raid by Confederates under the command of Major General Sterling Price into Missouri which began on 19 September 1864.[2] Price's primary aims were to recruit men from pro-Confederate areas of northern Missouri, capture the Federal arsenal at St Louis,[2] and seize animals and supplies for Confederate use.[3] He hoped that his raid might relieve the pressure on Confederate forces in Tennessee, Georgia, and Virginia by diverting Union troops to fight him;[2] he also hoped his raid would influence the November presidential election, by reducing support for Abraham Lincoln.[2][3]
After sustaining heavy casualties during the Battle of Fort Davidson, Price turned away from St. Louis, and headed towards Jefferson City, the state capital.[2] Nearing his objective, Price concluded that it was too heavily defended, and ordered his troops to move further west towards Lexington and Kansas City.[2] At this point, Price detached troops from his army to capture the city of Glasgow, on the Missouri River, having been informed of a storehouse there containing weapons and supplies.[1] A Union garrison of 800 men was located in Glasgow, under the command of Colonel Chester Harding. The size of the Confederate forces engaged against them was reported as being between 1,500 and 1,800 troops including infantry, cavalry, and artillery.[4] These were commanded by Brigadier Generals John Bullock Clark, Jr., and Joe Shelby.[1]
Battle
When the Confederates reached Glasgow, they laid siege to the town. Four pieces of Rebel artillery commenced shelling the city at 5 AM on October 15, 1864, and continued firing until 1 PM. Additional cannon were deployed to support the infantry assault, which began at 7 AM as Rebel soldiers advanced into Glasgow from multiple directions.[5] Hereford Hill, a nearby promontory which the Union soldiers had fortified, was also brought under attack.[1] After fierce resistance, the Federals were compelled to fall back from the town to their breastworks on the hill, but not before blowing up the Glasgow city hall, which they had been using to store their munitions.[6] The ensuing explosion destroyed a half-block of downtown Glasgow.[6]
Once atop the hill, the Union troops formed a line of defense. However, as the Confederates continued their steady advance, Harding became convinced that his forces could not win and accordingly surrendered his command at 1:30 PM, upon receipt of generous terms from his foes. The Confederates occupied Glasgow for three days, taking 1,200 muskets, 1,200 overcoats, and 150 horses before leaving to rejoin Price's command. A Federal steamboat captured at the Glasgow wharf was burned.[7] Captain G.A. Holloway, U.S. Adjutant General, testified to the "uniform, kind and gentlemanly treatment" the Federals received at the hands of Clark and Shelby.[8] The paroled Union troops were permitted to retain their personal property, and officers were allowed to keep their sidearms after the surrender. Clark equally permitted his defeated foes to proceed by any route they might select to Union lines at Boonville, and promised not to disturb private property or citizens remaining in the town.[8]
Aftermath
The Confederate victory at Glasgow and the captured supplies proved a boost to the Confederates' morale, especially after their failures to take St. Louis or Jefferson City.[1] Price's army would continue to advance through Missouri, but the high losses in men and material at the Battle of Westport on 23 October 1864 finally convinced Price to withdraw his forces from the state.[2] During the retreat, Price's men were attacked repeatedly by Union troops as they made their way through eastern Kansas and southwestern Missouri into Arkansas.[2] Price had not been able to gain enough recruits to replace his losses, and the large number of troops deployed against him in Missouri had solidified the already-formidable Union hold over that state.[2] Hence, Price's raid would ultimately be described as being "barren of results".[2] Although a bright spot in an otherwise rather dismal campaign, the Battle of Glasgow is considered to have been at best a "token" victory, though it did provide Price's forces with much-needed supplies.[2]
References
- U.S. National Park Service CWSAC Battle Summary
- Civil War Missouri Price's 1864 raid
- Society of Public Historians, Wichita State University, Kansas, United States
- Missouri Roadsides: The Traveler's Companion By Bill Earngey
- CWSAC Report Update
Notes
- ^ a b c d e f Battle Summary: Glasgow, MO, archived from the original on 2009-12-03
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Civil War Missouri Price's 1864 raid
- ^ a b Society of Public Historians, Wichita State University, Kansas, United States, archived from the original on 2007-09-15
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Report of Cpt. George Holloway, U.S. Army, Asst. Adjutant General, pp. 430–31.
- ^ Holloway, pg. 430.
- ^ a b Earngey, Bill (October 1995), Missouri Roadsides: The Traveler's Companion, ISBN 978-0-8262-1021-0
- ^ Report of Brig. Gen. John Clark, CSA, pp. 681–82.
- ^ a b Holloway, pg. 431.