Battle of Poitiers: Difference between revisions
m Reverting possible vandalism by 206.176.126.227 to version by TXiKiBoT. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot. (569327) (Bot) |
Texts from that era point to it starting earlier. |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|image= |
|image= |
||
|caption= |
|caption= |
||
|date=19 September |
|date=19 September 1355 |
||
|place=Near [[Maupertuis, Manche|Maupertuis]], south of [[Poitiers]], France |
|place=Near [[Maupertuis, Manche|Maupertuis]], south of [[Poitiers]], France |
||
|result=Decisive English Victory |
|result=Decisive English Victory |
||
Revision as of 17:26, 5 February 2009
| Battle of Poitiers | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Hundred Years' War | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
 Kingdom of England Duchy of Gascony |
 Kingdom of France | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
Edward, the Black Prince Jean III de Grailly, captal de Buch |
John II of France (POW) | ||||||
| Strength | |||||||
|
1,000 archers 6,000 foot soldiers [1] |
3,000 crossbowmen 500 knights 17,000 foot soldiers [1] | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| Minimal |
2,500 killed or wounded[1] 2,000 captured Including: John II Prince Phillip 17 lords 13 counts 5 viscounts 100 + knights | ||||||
- This article covers the battle during the Hundred Years' War. For the battle fought by Charles Martel against Muslim forces in 732, see Battle of Tours.
The Battle of Poitiers was fought between the Kingdoms of England and France on 19 September 1356 near Poitiers, resulting in the second of the three great English victories of the Hundred Years' War: Crécy, Poitiers, and Agincourt.
Background
On 8 August 1356, Edward, the Black Prince began a great chevauchée (raid) north from the English base in Aquitaine, in an effort to relieve allied garrisons in central France, as well as to raid and ravage the countryside. His sortie met little resistance, his Anglo-Gascon forces burning numerous towns to the ground and living off the land, until they reached the Loire River at Tours. His army was unable to take the castle nor could they burn the town, due to a heavy downpour. His delay there allowed John II, King of France, to attempt to catch Edward's army and eliminate it. The King, who had been confronting Henry of Grosmont in Normandy, arranged the bulk of his army at Chartres to the north of the besieged Tours, dismissing around 15,000–20,000 of his low-grade infantry to increase the speed of his forces.
Upon receiving reports of the French army on the move, Edward decided a retreat was in order. He marched south pursued in earnest by John. The French caught up to the English a few miles southwest of Poitiers. A veteran of the battle of Crécy, at which he had fought when he was only sixteen years old, the Black Prince decided on the same tactical scheme employed at that earlier battle. He positioned his troops in a strongly defensive position, in a plain surrounded by natural obstacles, such as a creek on the left and a wood on the back. The luggage wagons, with a great amount of plunder, remained along the old Roman road, the main route from Poitiers to Bordeaux, to give protection to his weak right side. All his men dismounted and were organized in two, or perhaps three units, with the English and Welsh longbowmen placed in a V-formation on both flanks.[2] The Black Prince kept a small cavalry unit, commanded by Jean de Grailly, the Captal de Buch, hidden in the woods at the rear.
The attacking French forces were divided in four parts. At the front were around 300 elite knights, commanded by general Clermont and accompanied by German mercenary pikemen. The purpose of this group was to charge the English archers and eliminate the threat they posed. These were followed by three groups of infantry (dismounted cavalry) commanded by the Dauphin (later Charles V of France), the Duke of Orléans and King John.
The Battle
.jpg)
At the beginning of the battle, the English simulated flight on their left wing. This provoked a hasty charge by the French knights against the archers. However, the English were expecting this and quickly attacked the enemy, especially the horses, with a shower of arrows. Belgian chronicler Jean Froissart writes that the French armour was invulnerable to the English arrows, that the arrowheads either skidded off the armour or shattered on impact. English history of the battle disputes this, as some claim that the narrow bodkin point arrows they used have been proven capable of penetrating most plate armour of that time period. While tests have been done to support this with fixed pieces of flat metal, armor was curved and moving men make very poor anvils—so the point is debatable. Given the following actions of the English archers—it seems likely Froissart was correct. The armour on the horses was weaker on the sides and back, so the English archers moved to the sides of the cavalry and shot the horses in the flanks. This was a popular method of stopping a cavalry charge, as a falling horse often destroyed the cohesion of the enemy's line. The results were devastating.
This attack was followed by the Dauphin's infantry, who engaged in heavy fighting, but withdrew to regroup. The next wave of infantry under Orléans, seeing that the Dauphin's men were not attacking, turned back and panicked. This stranded the forces led by the King himself. This was a formidable fighting force, and the English archers were out of arrows: the archers joined the infantry in the fight and some of both groups mounted horses to form an improvised cavalry. Combat was hard, but the Black Prince still had a mobile reserve hidden in the woods, which were able to circle around and attack the French in the flank and rear. The French were fearful of encirclement and attempted to flee. King John was captured with his immediate entourage.
Aftermath
The result was a decisive French defeat, not only in military terms, but also economically: France would be asked to pay a ransom equivalent to twice the country's yearly income to have the king returned. John, who was accorded royal privileges whilst being a prisoner, was permitted to return to France to try to raise the required funds. He subsequently handed himself back to the English, claiming to be unable to pay the ransom, and died a few months later. In many ways, Poitiers was a repeat of the battle of Crécy showing once again that tactics and strategy can overcome a disadvantage in numbers. As the Black Prince wrote shortly afterward in a letter to the people of London:
…it was agreed that we should take our way, flanking them, in such a manner that if they wished for battle or to draw towards us, in a place not very much to our disadvantage, we should be the first… the enemy was discomfited, and the king was taken, and his son; and a great number of other great people were both taken and slain…[3]
Notes and references
- ^ a b c Perrett, Bryan (1992). The Battle Book. London, England: Arms and Armour Press. ISBN 1-85409-328-2. p. 237.
- ^ The Battle of Crécy, by Jonathon Blair, referencing Armies of Crecy and Poitiers (Men-At-Arms Series, No 111), by Christopher Rothero
- ^ Amt, Emilie (2001). Medieval England 1000–1500: A Reader. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press. ISBN 1-55111-244-2.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) p. 335.
Further reading
- Belloc, Hilaire (1913). Poitiers, London: H. Rees. via Internet Archive.
- Green, David (2004). The Battle of Poitiers 1356. ISBN 0-7524-2557-9.
- Nicolle, David (2004). Poitiers 1356: The Capture of a King. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-516-3.
- Tuchman, Barbara (1978). A Distant Mirror. ISBN 0-345-34957-1.
External links
- On The Hundred Years War, a primary source written by Jean Froissart
- Great Battles: The Battle of Poitiers (myArmoury.com article)
