Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article review/Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)/archive2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Featured article review‎ | Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RetiredUser2 (talk | contribs) at 14:07, 24 June 2005 (subpage). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Aryan invasion theory

Article is no longer a featured article.

Uh-oh, when a supposedly FA article has cleanup template we have a problem. Nominated a year ago, passed with a single support. No references, external links in body, no picture. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:42, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Remove. The content itself seems ok (albeit somewhat essay-like), but there are severe structural problems. Phils 09:32, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove I agree with Phils, there are major structural problems and why is the bibliography in the middle of the article? Ganymead 05:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove. These are serious structural flaws, and must be fixed with the article going back through peer review and FAC before regaining its status. Harro5 07:11, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove. Neutralitytalk 14:13, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove -- ALoan (Talk) 17:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove --Theo (Talk) 13:17, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove - didn't we start the essential references criteria when this became FA? Could be wrong. Whatever, it could be a lot better. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:34, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove. Get rid of it; it's not worthy. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 21:42, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Aryan_Invasion_Theory_(history_and_controversies)/archive2&oldid=17715884"