C56 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Class C56
Japanese-national-railways-C56-31-20110622.jpg
C56 31 at the Yushukan in June 2011
Type and origin
Power typeSteam
BuilderNippon Sharyo
Build date1936
Specifications
Configuration:
 • Whyte2-6-0 Mogul
Gauge1,000 mm (3 ft 3 38 in)
Driver dia.1,400 mm
Length14,325 mm
Total weight65.53 t
Performance figures
Tractive effort8,290 kg
Career
OperatorsJapanese Government Railways, Imperial Japanese Army, State Railway of Thailand
Retired1977
Current ownerYūshūkan Museum, Tokyo
Dispositionstatic display

C56 31 was the 31st of the Class C56 steam locomotives produced by Japanese Government Railways (JGR). It was manufactured by Nippon Sharyo in Ishikawa Prefecture in 1936.[1] C56 31 was the first locomotive to run on the Thai-Burma Railway, also known as the Death Railway. It operated there during the war, after which it was used in Thailand. After the war it was brought back to Japan and restored, and is now displayed in the Yūshūkan, the museum attached to Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo. It is displayed without reference to the deaths during the construction of the railway, which are estimated at around 100,000.[2][3][4][5]

Wartime use[edit]

In 1942, C56 31 was shipped to Thailand.[6] It was one of 90 Japanese steam locomotives sent south to regions occupied by Japan. It was used in the opening ceremony for the Thai-Burma railway and was the first locomotive to officially run on the railway.

Postwar use and return to Japan[edit]

After the war it was used by the State Railway of Thailand. It was due to be retired in 1977, when plans were made to return it to Japan by an association of Southern Army Field Railway Corps officials. In 1979, it was returned to Japan.

Display at Yūshūkan museum[edit]

It has been displayed at the Yūshūkan museum at Yasukuni Shrine since 1979, where there is a volunteer group dedicated to preserving it.[7] The fact that it is displayed without references to the atrocities carried on on the Thai-Burma railway has attracted criticism, particularly from people from Australian and the US.[8][9][10][11]

References[edit]