Category talk:Clan Mackenzie

Proposed contents

I don't know what others think, but I tend to the view that this category should only contain articles of significance to the Mackenzies as a clan. In other words, it should not seek to include every notable person or feature called Mackenzie, simply because of their name (or, in the case of a person, simply because they happen to be members, or descended from members, of the Mackenzie clan). Any views? 45ossington (talk) 10:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]