Category talk:Pseudoscientific physicists
 | This category was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2014. The result of the discussion was 'no consensus'. |
Opposed speedy move request
[edit]- Category:Pseudoscientific physicists to Category:Pseudophysicists – C2C: And main article Pseudophysics. But leave the old title as a redirect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose speedy @LaundryPizza03: Pseudoscience is by its nature controversial. Also Category:Advocates of pseudoscience has amix of formats: Pseudoarchaeologists and Pseudoastronomers, but also Pseudoscientific biologists, Pseudoscientific diet advocates, Pseudoscientific physicists and Pseudoscientific psychologists. TSventon (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Pseudoscience is by its nature controversial" has no bearing on the decision between "Pseudoscientific physicists" and "Pseudophysicists" because pseudophysics is also "by its nature controversial".
- "has a mix a formats" is not the same as "should have a mix of formats".
- So, both reasons are invalid. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- I just checked the articles in the category:
- Of those, only Marinov is actually a physicist. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose speedy @LaundryPizza03: Pseudoscience is by its nature controversial. Also Category:Advocates of pseudoscience has amix of formats: Pseudoarchaeologists and Pseudoastronomers, but also Pseudoscientific biologists, Pseudoscientific diet advocates, Pseudoscientific physicists and Pseudoscientific psychologists. TSventon (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)