Category talk:Web 2.0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This category is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Internet (Rated Category-class)
WikiProject icon This category is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Category page Category  This category does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Websites / Computing  (Rated Category-class)
WikiProject icon This category is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Category page Category  This category does not require a rating on the quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This category is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 
WikiProject Internet culture (Rated Category-class)
WikiProject icon This category is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Category page Category  This category does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Category topics[edit]

Could someone please specify some criteria for what gets included here? I have some ideas, but I want to be sure. There seem to be both websites, software, and program codes listed here. So I would apprecoiate any possible help on this. thanks. --Sm8900 03:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

One side of the spectrum would be to eliminate all individual web sites from this category, for the same justification that all web "1.0" sites would not be listed under HTML. Truly notable or novel Web 2.0 sites (i.e. MySpace, Google Maps, etc.) may justify mention in the Web 2.0 article. Otherwise this just becomes a list of links [1]Cander0000 19:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This category is meaningless. "web 2.0" is just another way of saying "we added more useless JavaScript". Pretty stupid. 85.78.102.212 (talk) 10:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Contents header[edit]

This entry prints out "funny" with a URL printing out for each letter in the header (Contents) rather than just the capital letters. Can anyone fix this?68.193.241.248 (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)