Jump to content

Cayley graph

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Giftlite (talk | contribs) at 17:06, 3 October 2008 (→‎Examples: mv .). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Cayley graph of the free group on two generators a and b

In mathematics, the Cayley graph, also known as the Cayley colour graph, is the graph that encodes the structure of a discrete group. Its definition is suggested by Cayley's theorem (named after Arthur Cayley) and uses a particular, usually finite, set of generators for the group. It is a central tool in combinatorial and geometric group theory.

Definition

Suppose that is a group and is a generating set. The Cayley graph is a colored directed graph constructed as follows.

  • Each element of is assigned a vertex: the vertex set of is identified with
  • Each generator of is assigned a color .
  • For any the vertices corresponding to the elements and are joined by a directed edge of colour Thus the edge set consists of pairs of the form with providing the color.

In geometric group theory, the set is usually assumed to be finite, symmetric, i.e. and not containing the identity element of the group. In this case, the Cayley graph is an ordinary graph: its edges are not oriented and it does not contain loops.

Examples

  • Suppose that G = Z is the infinite cyclic group and the set S consists of the standard generator 1 and its inverse (−1 in the additive notation) then the Cayley graph is an infinite chain.
  • Similarly, if G = Zn is the finite cyclic group of order n and the set S consists of two elements, the standard generator of G and its inverse, then the Cayley graph is the cycle Cn.
  • The Cayley graph of the direct product of groups is the cartesian product of the corresponding Cayley graphs. Thus the Cayley graph of the abelian group Z2 with the set of generators consisting of four elements (±1, ±1) is the infinite grid on the plane R2, while for the direct product Zn × Zm with similar generators the Cayley graph is the n by m finite grid on a torus.
The Cayley graph of the dihedral group D4 on two generators α and β
  • The Cayley graph of the dihedral group D4 on two generators α and β is depicted to the right. Red arrows represent left-multiplication by element α. Since element β is self-inverse, the blue lines which represent left-multiplication by element β are undirected. Therefore the graph is mixed: it has eight vertices, eight arrows, and four edges. The Cayley table of the group D4 can be derived from the group presentation
  • The Cayley graph of the free group on two generators a, b corresponding to the set S = {a, b, a−1, b−1} is depicted at the top of the article, and e represents the identity element. Travelling along an edge to the right represents right multiplication by a, while travelling along an edge upward corresponds to the multiplication by b. Since the free group has no relations, the Cayley graph has no cycles. This Cayley graph is a key ingredient in the proof of the Banach–Tarski paradox.

Characterization

The group acts on itself by the left multiplication (see Cayley's theorem). This action may be viewed as the action of on its Cayley graph. Explicitly, an element maps a vertex to the vertex . The set of edges of the Cayley graph is preserved by this action: the edge is transformed into the edge . The left multiplication action of any group on itself is simply transitive, in particular, the Cayley graph is vertex transitive. This leads to the following characterization of Cayley graphs:

A graph is a Cayley graph of a group if and only if it admits a simply transitive action of by graph automorphisms (i.e. preserving the set of edges).

To recover the group and the generating set from the Cayley graph , select a vertex and label it by the identity element of the group. Then label each vertex of by the unique element of that trasforms into The set of generators of that yields as the Cayley graph is the set of labels of the vertices adjacent to the selected vertex. The generating set is finite (this is a common assumption for Cayley graphs) if and only if the graph is locally finite (i.e. each vertex is adjacent to finitely many edges).

Elementary properties

  • If a member of the generating set is its own inverse, , then it is generally represented by an undirected edge.
  • The Cayley graph depends in an essential way on the choice of the set of generators. For example, if the generating set has elements then each vertex of the Cayley graph has incoming and outgoing directed edges. In the case of a symmetric generating set with elements, the Cayley graph is a regular graph of degree
  • Cycles (or closed walks) in the Cayley graph indicate relations between the elements of In the more elaborate construction of the Cayley complex of a group, closed paths corresponding to relations are "filled in" by polygons.
  • If is a surjective group homomorphism and the images of the elements of the generating set for are distinct, then it induces a covering of graphs
where
In particular, if a group has generators, all of order different from 2, and the set consists of these generators together with their inverses, then the Cayley graph is covered by the infinite regular tree of degree corresponding to the free group on the same set of generators.
  • A graph can be constructed even if the set does not generate the group However, it is disconnected and is not considered to be a Cayley graph. In this case, each connected component of the graph represents a coset of the subgroup generated by .

Schreier coset graph

If one, instead, takes the vertices to be right cosets of a fixed subgroup , one obtains a related construction, the Schreier coset graph, which is at the basis of coset enumeration or the Todd-Coxeter process.

Connection to group theory

Insights into the structure of the group can be obtained by studying the adjacency matrix of the graph and in particular applying the theorems of spectral graph theory.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Babai, L. (1996). Technical Report TR-94-10. University of Chicago.[1]