Coaxial rotors or "coax rotors" are a pair of helicopter rotors mounted one above the other on concentric shafts, with the same axis of rotation, but turning in opposite directions (contra-rotation). This configuration is a feature of helicopters produced by the Russian Kamov helicopter design bureau.
In 1859, the British Patent Office awarded the first helicopter patent to Henry Bright for his coaxial design. From this point, coaxial helicopters developed into fully operational machines as we know them today.
Having two coaxial sets of rotors provides symmetry of forces around the central axis for lifting the vehicle and laterally when flying in any direction. Because of the mechanical complexity, many helicopter designs use alternate configurations to avoid problems that arise when only one rotor is used. Common alternatives are single-rotor helicopters or tandem rotor arrangements.
One of the problems with any single set of rotor blades is the torque (rotational force) exerted on the helicopter fuselage in the direction opposite to the rotor blades. This torque causes the fuselage to rotate in the direction opposite to the rotor blades. In single rotor helicopters, the antitorque rotor or tail rotor counteracts the main rotor torque and controls the fuselage rotation.
Coaxial rotors solve the problem of main rotor torque by turning each set of rotors in opposite directions. The opposite torques from the rotors cancel each other out. Rotational maneuvering, yaw control, is accomplished by increasing the collective pitch of one rotor and decreasing the collective pitch on the other. This causes a controlled dissymmetry of torque.
Dissymmetry of lift
Dissymmetry of lift is an aerodynamic phenomenon caused by the rotation of a helicopter's rotors in forward flight. Rotor blades provide lift proportional to the amount of air flowing over them. When viewed from above, the rotor blades move in the direction of flight for half of the rotation (advancing half), and then move in the opposite direction for the remainder of the rotation (retreating half). A rotor blade produces more lift in the advancing half. As a blade moves toward the direction of flight, the forward motion of the aircraft increases the speed of the air flowing around the blade until it reaches a maximum when the blade is perpendicular to the relative wind. At the same time, a rotor blade in the retreating half produces less lift. As a blade moves away from the direction of flight, the speed of the airflow over the rotor blade is reduced by an amount equal to the forward speed of the aircraft, reaching its maximum effect when the rotor blade is again perpendicular to the relative wind. Coaxial rotors avoid the effects of dissymmetry of lift through the use of two rotors turning in opposite directions, causing blades to advance on either side at the same time.
Another benefit arising from a coaxial design includes increased payload for the same engine power; a tail rotor typically wastes some of the available engine power that would be fully devoted to lift and thrust with a coaxial design. Reduced noise is a second advantage of the configuration; some of the loud "slapping" noise associated with conventional helicopters arises from interaction between the airflows from the main and tail rotors, which in some designs can be severe. Also, helicopters using coaxial rotors tend to be more compact (with a smaller footprint on the ground), though at the price of increased height, and consequently have uses in areas where space is at a premium; several Kamov designs are used in naval roles, being capable of operating from confined spaces on the decks of ships, including ships other than aircraft carriers (an example being the Kara Class cruisers of the Russian navy, which carry a Ka-25 'Hormone' helicopter as part of their standard equipment). Another benefit is increased safety on the ground; the absence of a tail rotor eliminates the major source of injuries and fatalities to ground crews and bystanders.
A principal disadvantage of the coaxial rotor design is the increased mechanical complexity of the rotor hub. The linkages and swashplates for two rotor systems need to be assembled atop the mast, which is more complex because of the need to drive two rotors in opposite directions. Because of the greater number of moving parts and complexity, the coaxial rotor system is more prone to mechanical faults and possible failure. Coaxial helicopters are also more prone to the "whipping" of blades and blade self-collision according to critics.
The system's inherent stability and quick control response make it suitable for use in small radio controlled helicopters. These benefits come at the cost of a limited forward speed, and higher sensitivity to wind. These two factors are especially limiting in outdoor use. Such models are usually fixed-pitch (i.e., the blades cannot be rotated on their axes for different angles of attack), simplifying the model but eliminating the ability to compensate with collective input. Compensating for even the slightest breeze causes the model to climb rather than to fly forward even with full application of cyclic.
Multirotor type Unmanned Aerial Vehicles exist in numerous configurations including tricopter, quadcopter, hexacopter and octocopter. All of them can be upgraded to coaxial configuration in order to bring more stability and flight time while allowing carrying much more payload without gaining too much weight. Indeed, coaxial multirotors are made by having each arm carrying two motors facing in opposite direction (one up and one down). Therefore, it is possible to have an octorotor looking like a quadcopter thanks to coaxial configuration. Having more lifting power for a greater payload explains why coaxial multirotors are preferred for all professional commercial application of UAS.
Reduced hazards of flight
The U.S. Department of Transportation has published a “Basic Helicopter Handbook”. One of the chapters in it is titled, “Some Hazards of Helicopter Flight'. Ten hazards have been listed to indicate what a typical single rotor helicopter has to deal with. The unique coaxial rotor design either reduces or completely eliminates these hazards. The following list indicates which:
- Settling with power — Reduced
- Retreating blade stall — Reduced
- Medium frequency vibrations — Reduced
- High frequency vibrations — None
- Anti torque system failure in forward flight — Eliminated
- Anti torque system failure while hovering — Eliminated
List of coaxial rotor helicopters
- Brantly B-1 (1946, but not produced in quantity)
- Breguet-Dorand giroplane laboratoire (1936)
- Breguet GIIE (1949-1951)
- Cierva CR Twin (1969)
- Eagle's Perch
- EDM Aerotec CoAX 2D/2R
- Gyrodyne QH-50 DASH
- Gyrodyne 2C
- Gyrodyne XRON-1
- Gyrodyne GCA2
- Kamov Ka-8
- Kamov Ka-10
- Kamov Ka-15
- Kamov Ka-25
- Kamov Ka-26
- Kamov Ka-226
- Kamov Ka-27
- Kamov Ka-31
- Kamov Ka-32
- Kamov Ka-50 Black Shark
- Kamov Ka-52 Alligator
- Kamov-Kumertau Rotorfly
- Kamov Ka-92
- Manzolini Libellula (1952)
- Phoenix Skyblazer
- Sikorsky S-69 (1973) - experimental compound helicopter
- Sikorsky X2 (2008) - experimental high speed compound helicopter
- Sikorsky S-97
- Sikorsky/Boeing SB-1 Defiant
- Leishman, J. Gordon (2006). Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 0-521-85860-7
- NASA Technical Paper 3675
- A History of Helicopter Flight , J. Gordon Leishman Professor of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park.
- "На юго-востоке Москвы разбился новый боевой вертолет". BBC. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
- "Multirotor Frame Configurations". Coptercraft. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
- Coaxial Benefits
- Aerodynamic Features of Coaxial Configuration Helicopters
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Helicopters with coaxial rotors.|