Coefficient of colligation
This article needs more links to other articles to help integrate it into the encyclopedia. (May 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
In statistics, Yule’s Y, also known as the coefficient of colligation, is a measure of association between two binary variables. The measure was developed by George Udny Yule in 1912, and should not be confused with Yule's coefficient for measuring skewness based on quartiles.
For a 2×2 table for binary variables U and V with frequencies or proportions
V = 0 V = 1 U = 0 a b U = 1 c d
Yule's Y is given by
Yule's Y is closely related to the odds ratio OR = ad/(bc) as is seen in following formula:
Yule's Y varies from −1 to +1. −1 reflects total negative correlation, +1 reflects perfect positive association while 0 reflects no association at all. These correspond to the values for the more common Pearson correlation.
This section does not cite any sources. (February 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Yule’s Y gives the fraction of perfect association in per unum (multiplied by 100 it represents this fraction in a more familiar percentage). Indeed, the formula transforms the original 2×2 table in a crosswise symmetric table wherein b = c = 1 and a = d = √.
For a crosswise symmetric table with frequencies or proportions a = d and b = c it is very easy to see that it can be split up in two tables. In such tables association can be measured in a perfect clear way by dividing (a – b) by (a + b). In transformed tables b has to be substituted by 1 and a by √. The transformed table has the same degree of association (the same OR) as the original not crosswise symmetric table. So the association in not symmetric tables can as well be measured by Yule’s Y interpreting Yule’s Y in the same way as it can be interpreted for symmetric tables. Of course Yule’s Y and (a − b)/(a + b) gives the same result in crosswise symmetric tables. So Yule’s measures association as a fraction for the two kinds of tables.
Yule’s Y measures association in a substantial, intuitively understandable way and therefore it is the measure of preference to measure association.
The following crosswise symmetric table
V = 0 V = 1 U = 0 40 10 U = 1 10 40
can be split up into two tables:
V = 0 V = 1 U = 0 10 10 U = 1 10 10
V = 0 V = 1 U = 0 30 0 U = 1 0 30
It is obvious that the degree of association equals 0.6 per unum (60%).
The following asymmetric table can be transformed in a table with an equal degree of association (the odds ratios of both tables are equal).
V = 0 V = 1 U = 0 3 1 U = 1 3 9
Here follows the transformed table:
V = 0 V = 1 U = 0 3 1 U = 1 1 3
The odds ratios of both tables are equal to 9. Y = (3 − 1)/(3 + 1) = 0.5 (50%)
Yule's Q is given by:
and so Yule's Q and Yule's Y are related by
Q varies from −1 to +1. −1 reflects total negative association, +1 reflects perfect positive association and 0 reflects no association at all. The sign depends on which pairings the analyst initially considered to be concordant, but this choice does not affect the magnitude.
- Yule, G. Udny (1912). "On the Methods of Measuring Association Between Two Attributes". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 75 (6): 579. doi:10.2307/2340126.
- Michel G. Soete. A new theory on the measurement of association between two binary variables in medical sciences: association can be expressed in a fraction (per unum, percentage, pro mille....) of perfect association (2013), e-article, BoekBoek.be
- Goodman, L. A.; Kruskal, W. H. (1954). "Measures of association for cross classifications". Journal of the American statistical association. 49 (268): 732–764. doi:10.1080/01621459.1954.10501231.