Comparison of distributed file systems
In computing, a distributed file system (DFS) or network file system is any file system that allows access to files from multiple hosts sharing via a computer network. This makes it possible for multiple users on multiple machines to share files and storage resources.
Distributed file systems differ in their performance, mutability of content, handling of concurrent writes, handling of permanent or temporary loss of nodes or storage, and their policy of storing content.
Locally managed
Client | Written in | License | Access API |
---|---|---|---|
Ceph | C++ | LGPL | librados (C, C++, Python, Ruby), S3, Swift, FUSE |
FhGFS | C / C++ | FRAUNHOFER FS (FhGFS) EULA,[1]
GPLv2 client |
POSIX |
GlusterFS | C | GPLv3 | libglusterfs, FUSE, NFS, SMB, Swift, libgfapi |
ObjectiveFS[2] | C | Proprietary | POSIX, FUSE |
MooseFS | C | GPLv2 | POSIX, FUSE |
Quantcast File System | C | Apache License 2.0 | C++ client, FUSE (C++ server: MetaServer and ChunkServer are both in C++) |
Lustre | C | GPLv2 | POSIX, liblustre, FUSE |
OpenAFS | C | IBM Public License | Virtual file system, Installable File System |
Tahoe-LAFS | Python | GNU GPL 2+ and other[3] | HTTP (browser or CLI), SFTP, FTP, FUSE via SSHFS, pyfilesystem |
HDFS | Java | Apache License 2.0 | Java and C client, HTTP |
XtreemFS | Java, C++ | BSD License | libxtreemfs (Java, C++), FUSE |
Ori[4] | C, C++ | MIT | libori, FUSE |
Remote access
Name | Run by | Access API |
---|---|---|
Amazon S3 | Amazon.com | HTTP (REST/SOAP) |
Google Cloud Storage | HTTP (REST) | |
SWIFT (part of OpenStack) | Rackspace, Hewlett-Packard, others | HTTP (REST) |
Microsoft Azure | Microsoft | HTTP (REST) |
Cleversafe | Cleversafe | HTTP (REST) |
Comparison
Some researchers have made a functional and experimental analysis of several distributed file systems including HDFS, Ceph, Gluster, Lustre and old (1.6.x) version of MooseFS, although this document is over 2 years old and a lot of information may be outdated (e.g. MooseFS has at the time of writing this stable 2.0 and beta 3.0 version and HA for Metadata Server - since 2.0 and it is not mentioned in this document).[5]
See also
References
- ^ "FRAUNHOFER FS (FhGFS) END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT". Fraunhofer Society. 2012-02-22.
- ^ "ObjectiveFS official website".
- ^ "About Tahoe-LAFS".
- ^ "Ori: A Secure Distributed File System".
- ^ Séguin, Cyril; Depardon, Benjamin; Le Mahec, Gaël. "Analysis of Six Distributed File Systems" (PDF). HAL.