Competitive Tax Plan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Competitive Tax Plan is an approach to taxation, suggested in the United States, that would impose a 10–15% value added tax (VAT) and reduce personal and corporate income taxes. The plan was created by Michael J. Graetz, professor at Columbia law school, and a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy. Graetz states that it would generate enough revenue so that families with $100,000 of annual income or less — almost 90% of all current filers — would not have to pay income taxes or file tax returns.[1] Graetz would provide a new payroll tax offset to replace the Earned Income Tax Credit and to protect low and moderate income workers from any tax increase under the new system. Under the initial proposal, households with an annual income of more than $100,000 would be taxed at a flat 25% rate and the corporate income tax rate would be reduced to 25%. Graetz argues that reducing the corporate tax rate "would make the United States an extremely attractive nation for corporate investments for both U.S. citizens and foreign investors".[1] According to an article in the November 19, 2002 issue of The Wall Street Journal, the Competitive Tax Plan is already being given consideration by officials in the United States Treasury Department. In 2013, Graetz presented an updated version of his plan for 2015.[2]

About Author[3][edit]

Michael J. Graetz is professor at Columbia Alumni of Tax Law. He was born at November 20 1944, in Atlanta, Georgia. He is married and has five children.He is also a leading expert on national and international tax law. He was teaching at many universities namely University of Virginia Law School, University of Southern California, California Institute of Technology, Yale Law School and currently already mentioned Columbia Law School. He also worked as assistant to the secretary and special counsel for the Department of the Treasury. He was rewarded by Esquire Magazine and also won the Daniel M. Holland Medal by the National Tax Association. He has written more than 80 articles on a wide range of tax, international taxation, health policy, and social insurance issues.

The "Competitive Tax Plan" updated for 2015[edit]

In his work we can see that in comparison to OECD ( Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) , he call the U.S. as a "Low Tax Country" , meant as the total federal, state and local tax revenues as a percentage of GDP( Gross Domestic Product) are much lower than the one of OECD. What can be interesting is that the Income Tax in the U.S. in comparison to EU27 and OECD is equal or even higher. The U.S. has according to Graetz's data from 2010 low consumption taxas a percentage of total taxation. Further he mentions that the U.S. has been the only OECD country without a VAT in comparison to more than 160 countries all over the world that has already have a VAT. This needs to change according to his work. So he came with the so called " the five pieces of competitive tax plan" The steps are[2]:

  • "First, enact a VAT, a broad-based tax on sales of goods and services, now used by more than 160 countries worldwide. Many English-speaking countries call this a goods and services tax (GST)."
  • "Second, use the revenue produced by this consumption tax to finance an income tax exemption of $100,000 of family income—freeing more than 120 million American families from income taxation—and lower the income tax rates on income above that amount."
  • "Third, lower the corporate income tax rate to 15 percent."
  • "Fourth, protect low-and-moderate-income workers from a tax increase through payroll tax cuts."
  • "Fifth, protect low-and-moderate income families from a tax increase by substantially expanded refundable tax credits for children, delivered through debit cards to be used at the cash register."

There are some basic principles in the proposal for the goods and service tax:

  • Broad-base, Single Rate, Credit-Method
  • "Models are modern VATs like New Zealand, Australia, Canada, Singapore, and South Africa, not the archaic European VATs."
  • "Destination-Based, Border-Adjusted"
  • "High-threshold for Registration"
  • "Incentive for States to piggy back"
  • "Eighteen Month to Two-Year Interval between enactment and implementation for businesses and IRS to gear up"

Proposed VAT is 12.9%.

The next point in the competitive tax plan is to shrink the income tax. He proposed to limit the income tax only to high income earners in order to ensure federal tax progressivity. Another step is to provide a Family Allowance of $100,000 for married couples ($50,000 for singles, $75,000 for heads of households). This step will eliminate great part of income tax return( more than 120 million), and it also will resulted in fewer than 20 percent of all U.S. tax units will be required to file income tax returns. He stated specific levels of income tax rates. For example, for married couples it will be:

  • 14% for income between $100,000 and $200,000
  • 27% for income between $200,000 and $600,000
  • 31% for income over $600,000

The next step of the Proposal is to "Reduce and Reform the Corporate Income Tax". Proposed tax rate is 15 percent. This step should solve the problem with international income taxation as it reverse current law’s incentives to locate deductions here and income abroad. It will also repeal the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax. It should simplify small businesses taxation.

Another part of the plan is to protect low and middle income families in the way that delivering new child credits through debit cards that can be used at the cash register. All children qualify for $1,500 per child( but for married couples with more than $150,000 ($75,000 singles and heads of households), these credits phase-out at a rate of 5%*). For low and moderate income workers it will be even more.

Next to protecting low and middle income families, the plan also speaks about protecting low and moderate income workers by providing a Payroll Tax Credit of 15.3 percent for wages up to $10,000 and $1,530 per worker for all workers with earnings between $10,000 and $40,000. This credit eliminates all payroll taxes for workers with $10,000 or less of earnings, also it eliminates at least the employees’ share (half) of payroll taxes for workers with earnings below $20,000. Above $40,000 this credit phases out at a rate of 7.65 percent.

Advantages of the Competitive Tax Plan[edit]

The plan makes the U.S. a low income-tax country, for all Americans it would mean that their taxes on savings and investments will be lower and for most of them it will resulted in no tax on their savings. The vast majority of Americans would never have to deal with the IRS. Another great advantage of this plan is that unlike other unique consumption tax proposals (e.g., the Flat Tax; David Bradford’s X-Tax; George W. Bush’s Panel’s Growth and Investment Tax), this proposal fits well with existing international tax and trade agreements. A 15 % corporate tax rate solves the problems caused by international tax planning by multinational corporations and competition for corporate investments among nations. These are just a few of many advantages of this plan( for more see [2]).

No formal bill for the Competitive Tax Plan itself is in Congress; however Senator Ben Cardin's Progressive Consumption Tax Act has many similar features.[4][5]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Yale Law School Professor Michael Graetz Proposes Reform, Repeal of Income Tax". Yale Law School. 2002-11-08. Retrieved 2007-08-08. 
  2. ^ a b c Graetz, Michael. "The Graetz Competitive Tax Plan: Update for 2015". Tax Policy Center. Retrieved 6 April 2016. 
  3. ^ "Michael J. Graetz". Columbia Law School. Retrieved 2018-05-01. 
  4. ^ "S.3005 - Progressive Consumption Tax Act of 2014". 
  5. ^ Schuyler, Michael. "An Analysis of Senator Cardin's Progressive Consumption Tax". The Tax Foundation. The Tax Foundation. Retrieved 6 April 2016. 

References[edit]

External links[edit]