Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
|Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.|
|Argued April 15, 1908|
Decided June 1, 1908
|Full case name||Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.|
|Citations||210 U.S. 405 (more)|
|Prior history||150 F. 741 (1st Cir. 1906)|
|It was not unreasonable for a patent owner to use existing equipment embodying old technology rather than to build new machines using new patents. Also, it was not unreasonable for the patent owner to refuse to license others to use its new patents.|
Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 U.S. 405 (1908), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the principle that patent holders have no obligation to use their patent.
Eastern Paper Bag brought an action to prevent its competitor Continental Paper Bag from using its patent for a "self-opening" paper bag. Continental Paper Bag alleged that Eastern Paper Bag was not using its patent but simply trying to suppress competition.
Decision of the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court rejected this argument by Continental Paper Bag, holding that it was the essence of the patent to exclude others without question of motive.
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 210
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386 (1945)
- Chin, Yee Wah (1997). "Unilateral Technology Suppression: Appropriate Antitrust and Patent Law Remedies" (PDF). Antitrust Law Journal. 66: 441.
- Hovenkamp, Herbert; Janis, Mark D.; Lemley, Mark A. (2005). "Unilateral Refusals to License in the U.S". Working Paper No. 303, Stanford Law School John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics. doi:10.2139/ssrn.703161.
- Works related to Continental Paper Bag Company v. Eastern Paper Bag Company at Wikisource
- ^ Text of Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 U.S. 405 (1908) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia
|This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|