Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
|Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council|
|Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
|Full case name||Stephen P. Crosby, Secretary of Administration and Finance of Massachusetts, et al. v. National Foreign Trade Council|
|Citations||530 U.S. 363 (more)
120 S. Ct. 2288
|The state Act is preempted and its application unconstitutional, under the Supremacy Clause.|
|Majority||Souter, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer|
|Concurrence||Scalia, joined by Thomas|
|U.S. Const. art. VI|
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363 (2000), was a unanimous case in which the Supreme Court of the United States used the federal preemption doctrine to strike down the Massachusetts Burma Law, a law that effectively prohibited Massachusetts' governmental agencies from buying goods and services from companies conducting business with Myanmar (Burma), essentially a secondary boycott. The Massachusetts Burma Law was modeled after similar legislation that had targeted the apartheid regime of South Africa.
The Court reasoned that since the United States Congress passed a law imposing sanctions on Myanmar, the Massachusetts law "undermines the intended purpose and 'natural effect' of at least three provisions of the federal Act, that is, its delegation of effective discretion to the President to control economic sanctions against Burma, its limitation of sanctions solely to United States persons and new investment, and its directive to the President to proceed diplomatically in developing a comprehensive, multilateral strategy towards Burma."
- Denning, Brannon P.; McCall, Jack H. (2000). "Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council. 120 S.Ct. 2288". American Journal of International Law. The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No. 4. 94 (4): 750–758. JSTOR 2589803. doi:10.2307/2589803.
- Stumberg, Robert; Porterfield, Matthew C. (2001). "Who Preempted the Massachusetts Burma Law? Federalism and Political Accountability under Global Trade Rules". Publius. Publius, Vol. 31, No. 3. 31 (3): 173–204. JSTOR 3330999. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004903.
|This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|