Direct part marking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
An example of a Data Matrix marked on the surface

Direct part marking (DPM) is a process to permanently mark parts with product information including serial numbers, part numbers, date codes, and barcodes. This is done to allow the tracking of parts through the full life cycle.

The interpretation of 'permanent' often depends on the context the part is used. In the aerospace industry an aircraft part may be in service for over 30 years. Within telecom and computer industries the life cycle may only last a few years.

DPM is often used by automotive, aerospace, and electronic manufacturers to facilitate a reliable identification of their parts. This can assist in data logging for safety, warranty issues and satisfy regulatory requirements. Also the United States Department of Defense demands a physical mark on tangible assets in conjunction with the Item Unique Identification.

Barcode types[edit]

There are many ways to encode an information to a machine-readable code. The preferred codes are the Data Matrix [1] and the QR Code. Data Matrix is used by Motorola.[2] It is also preferred by NASA to mark parts. In the automotive industries also the QR Code is used. This is founded in the fact that this code was initially developed by Denso Wave (a global automotive components manufacturer) for tracking parts in vehicle manufacturing.

Marking methods[edit]

Methods to produce a permanent mark on parts are:

Other methods like manual metal stamp, vibro-etch and embossing were not suitable to successfully apply micro size (1/32- to 15/64-inch square), high density machine-readable symbols.[3]

Indenting, Embossing, and Coining are common methods for high speed marking of parts. Such as security seals, keys, small parts, and data tags. Specifically for man readable data. Laser, Scribe, and Dot Peen marking are incapable of keeping up with high volume production methods. Laser Marking also lacks the permanence of Indenting.[4]

Marking method selection factors[edit]

The marking method depends on a number of different factors:

  • Part function
    Non-intrusive marking methods are recommended for parts used in safety critical applications like aircraft engines or high pressure and high stress systems.
  • Part geometry
    It is more difficult to place a Data Matrix on a curved surface than it is on a flat surface.
  • Surface
    Highly polished metal surfaces should be textured to reduce glare prior to marking. The textured area should extend one symbol width beyond the borders of marking.
  • Part Size
    When a 2D Symbol is used, the size of the part is not a relevant factor as the available marking area is reduced to below 1/4 inch square.
  • Operating environment / age life
    It should be controlled, if the used marking method can survive in its intended environment and remain readable for the life cycle of the part.
  • Surface roughness / Finish
    A rough surface is more challenging for a 2D barcode as the data elements can be recognized appropriately. The surface roughness levels should be limited to 8 micro-inches for dot-peen marking, laser and scribe systems can make a readable mark in rougher surfaces. The laser systems burn a "quiet zone" first and then the 2D code. The scribe method provides a high resolution 2D mark that makes the part readily readable in most cast surfaces.[5]
  • Surface thickness
    Surface thickness must be taken into account when applying intrusive markings to prevent deformation or excessive weakening of the part. In most applications the marking depth should not exceed 1/10 the thickness of the part.

Standards and regulations[edit]

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ Andreeta, M. R. B.; Cunha, L. S.; Vales, L. F.; Caraschi, L. C.; Jasinevicius, R. G. (2011). "Bidimensional codes recorded on an oxide glass surface using a continuous wave CO2 laser". Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 21 (2): 025004. Bibcode:2011JMiMi..21b5004A. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/21/2/025004.
  2. ^ http://www.mmh.com/article/CA6437021.html Direct part marking: The next hot trend in automatic identification
  3. ^ https://standards.nasa.gov/documents/viewdoc/3314928/3314928 NASA-STD-6002D
  4. ^ "Why You Should Choose Indent Marking for Your UID | Numberall". Numberall Stamp & Tool Co., Inc. 2017-09-01. Retrieved 2018-04-17.
  5. ^ [Scribe 2D code on cast surfaces]http://columbiamt.com/CMT-Square-Dot-Marking/Cast_Surface.html