Draft:Carlo-Schmid-Programme
Submission declined on 17 September 2024 by Jlwoodwa (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
The Carlo Schmid Programme (CSP) is a scholarship programme set up in 2001 for internships at international organisations and EU institutions. It is organised by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the German Academic Scholarship Foundation (Studienstiftung).
It is aimed at highly qualified students and graduates who want to familiarise themselves with the problems and working methods in the international administrative sector and thus improve their chances of working there later on.
The programme is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.[1] The Robert Bosch Stiftung was involved in funding the programme from 2001 to 2012, and the Mercator Foundation from 2012 to 2021.[2] The Tönissteiner Kreis is supporting the programme with mentoring tasks.
There has been an alumni association since 2003: the CSP Network for International Politics and Co-Operation.[3]
The programme is named after the German social democratic politician and constitutional law expert Carlo Schmid.
References
[edit]- ^ "Carlo-Schmid-Programm". Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes (in German). 2024-09-17. Retrieved 2024-09-17.
- ^ "Carlo-Schmid-Program (CSP) Executive Summary" (PDF). DAAD. August 2021. Retrieved 2024-09-17.
- ^ "CSP Network for International Politics and Co-Operation". CSP Network for International Politics and Co-Operation.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.