Draft:Glenn Fiedler
Submission declined on 3 January 2025 by Vrxces (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 23 December 2024 by CSMention269 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CSMention269 11 days ago. |
Submission declined on 22 December 2024 by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by AlphaBetaGamma 12 days ago. |
- Comment: As you know WP:BLP tends to have a bit of a higher standard for notability and sourcing. Here there's not really a lot of coverage or sourcing specifically on Fiedler as opposed to the work he as done as part of the development companies he has worked for. On the Criticism section, WP:ONEEVENT applies - we can't say that he's notable as a whole if the coverage about him is only picking up a very narrow thing he said at one time! VRXCES (talk) 02:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Please read WP:OVERKILL ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: It seems you might have a better shot at having an article for Network Next being published given the sources provide more information and coverage for the startup not the developer. Your choice, but I'm still declining this draft. Also, external links in the body of the draft must be removed. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Glenn Fiedler is a veteran multiplayer game developer. He is credited for work on 16 games:[1] and made significant contributions to the multiplayer of Journey[2][3][4], which won a BAFTA for best online multiplayer in 2013[5].
Personal Life
[edit]Glenn Fiedler attended Baulkham Hills High School, in Baulkham Hills, New South Wales[6].
Game Development Career
[edit]Glenn Fiedler is credited on the following titles[7]
- Freedom Force
- Mercenaries 2
- PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale
- Surgeon Simulator 2
- Driving Strikers
- Knockout City
- Tribes: Vengeance
- SWAT 4
- God of War III
- L.A. Noire
- Journey
- God of War: Ascension
- Titanfall
- Titanfall 2
- WRC 9
Criticism of The Division
[edit]In 2016, Fiedler criticized the netcode of The Division in response to rampant cheating post launch, claiming that the cheating was the result of a "trusted client network model" and may require a complete rewrite of the netcode to fix. This criticism was picked up by a number of news sites, including The Guardian[8][9][10][11][12]
References
[edit]- ^ "Glenn Fiedler". MobyGames. Retrieved 2024-12-21.
- ^ Leon Hurley (2016-04-27). "Why The Division is broken online according to a former God of War & Titanfall dev". gamesradar. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
- ^ "Journey credits (PlayStation 3, 2012)". MobyGames. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
- ^ Peters, Jay (2022-03-13). "10 years later, there's still nothing like Journey's multiplayer". The Verge. Retrieved 2025-01-02.
- ^ "Online Multiplayer". Bafta. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
- ^ NSW, Board of Studies Teaching and Educational Standards. "– Board of Studies Teaching and Educational Standards NSW". www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au. Retrieved 2024-12-21.
- ^ "Glenn Fiedler". MobyGames. Retrieved 2024-12-21.
- ^ Stanton, Rich (2016-04-26). "Have hackers and cheats ruined The Division on PC?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-12-22.
- ^ Leon Hurley (2016-04-27). "Why The Division is broken online according to a former God of War & Titanfall dev". gamesradar. Retrieved 2024-12-22.
- ^ Angus Morrison (2016-04-27). "Veteran network programmer says The Division needs a "complete rewrite"". PC Gamer. Retrieved 2024-12-22.
- ^ Daws, Ryan (2016-04-27). "Ex-programmer at Respawn and Sony criticises The Divisions network model". Developer Tech News. Retrieved 2024-12-22.
- ^ Orland, Kyle (2016-04-27). "The Division appears to be broken at a fundamental level, enabling cheats". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2024-12-22.