Dworshak Dam, with spillways open
|Location||Clearwater County, Idaho|
|Purpose||Water storage, power|
|Construction cost||$327 million|
Corps of Engineers
|Dam and spillways|
|Type of dam||Gravity dam|
|Impounds||North Fork of the|
|Height||717 ft (219 m)|
|Length||3,287 ft (1,002 m)|
|Spillways||Service, 2x tainter gates|
|Spillway capacity||150,000 cu ft/s (4,200 m3/s)|
|Total capacity||3,468,000 acre⋅ft (4.278 km3)|
|Active capacity||2,016,000 acre⋅ft (2.487 km3)|
|Catchment area||2,440 sq mi (6,300 km2)|
|Surface area||17,090 acres (6,920 ha) (max)|
|Normal elevation||1,600 feet (490 m) AMSL|
|Hydraulic head||560 ft (170 m)|
|Turbines||2x 90 MW|
1x 220 MW
|Installed capacity||400 MW|
460 MW (max. planned)
|Annual generation||1.693 billion KWh|
Dworshak Dam is a concrete gravity dam in the western United States, on the North Fork Clearwater River in Clearwater County, Idaho. The dam is located approximately four miles (6 km) northwest of Orofino and impounds the Dworshak Reservoir for flood control and hydroelectricity generation. With a height of 717 feet (219 m), Dworshak is the third tallest dam in the United States and the tallest straight-axis concrete dam in the Western Hemisphere. Construction of the dam by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) began in 1966 and was completed in 1973.
The proposal for Dworshak Dam originated in a 1953 USACE survey of the lower Snake River drainage basin for suitable sites to develop reservoir storage and hydroelectric power generation. Dworshak was one of seven dam sites considered on the Snake, Salmon and Clearwater River systems. The final site for Dworshak Dam was chosen at a point on the North Fork of the Clearwater 1.9 miles (3.1 km) above its confluence with the larger Clearwater River. The project was authorized on October 23, 1962, as Bruces Eddy Dam; the name was later changed to honor Senator Henry Dworshak (1894–1962), who was instrumental in gaining congressional approval for the dam project.
The dam was controversial from the start, because it would block fish migration and its reservoir would flood a large portion of the winter range of elk in the Clearwater River basin. The North Fork of the Clearwater River had an excellent run of steelhead trout and "may have been the finest population of large-size steelhead in the world". However, proponents of the project held that the construction of a fish hatchery would maintain the river's steelhead runs, and that the construction of the dam would render other dam projects in the Clearwater River basin unnecessary. Another big incentive for the project was flood control; supporters of Dworshak cited a devastating flood in 1948, when the Clearwater River reached a peak of 177,000 cubic feet per second (5,000 m3/s) – eleven times its normal flow – as further reason for the construction of a large storage dam.
While clearing and preparations at the dam site were underway as early as June 1965, actual construction did not begin until early 1966 with the excavation of a 40-foot (12 m) diameter diversion tunnel and the creation of a 110-foot (34 m) high cofferdam to divert the river around the dam site. Excavation of keyways in the canyon walls to provide future foundations for the concrete commenced in 1966 and continued through 1968. The first bucket of concrete was placed in early 1968, and by May 28, 1969, more than 1,000,000 cubic yards (760,000 m3) had been poured in the dam. Concrete placement was accomplished by a cableway system supported by three movable towers on the canyon rims, transporting buckets that each had a capacity of 8 cubic yards (6.1 m3) of wet concrete. The diversion tunnel was closed on September 27, 1971, allowing the reservoir to begin filling, and the last concrete was poured on the dam crest on January 27, 1973. Three generating units of the power plant were also installed in 1973, and by March 1, the reservoir had risen to a sufficient level to allow power generation to begin. The reservoir first reached full capacity 46 years ago on July 3, 1973.
After the dam was completed, the USACE acquired 5,120 acres (20.7 km2) of land adjacent to the reservoir (later expanded to 9,100 acres (37 km2)) and has since managed it for winter habitat of elk and white-tailed deer. Because Dworshak Dam is too high for a fish ladder to be economically feasible, the USACE constructed the Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) at a cost of $21 million to mitigate losses of the North Fork steelhead run caused by Dworshak Dam. The hatchery is located on the small peninsula of land between the North Fork and the main Clearwater River directly above their confluence. Now operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the fish hatchery actually went into operation in April 1969, four years before the dam was completed. The hatchery has a capacity of 6,000 adult fish and releases about 3.4 million juveniles into the river system each year.
The Dworshak Dam power station was designed to accommodate six generating units for purposes of peaking power production. However, this form of operation would cause excessively large flow fluctuations on the North Fork Clearwater River, and the main Clearwater River below their confluence at Ahsahka. A dam was to be built on the Clearwater River above Lenore to provide a forebay for smoothing out Dworshak releases, but due to opposition by local residents it was never built. Although it would have been fitted with a fish ladder, the Lenore dam would have affected steelhead and salmon migration to the entire upper Clearwater River and its tributaries, including the South Fork, Middle Fork, Lochsa and Selway Rivers. In addition, the flooding caused by its 11-mile (18 km)-long reservoir would require the relocation of the Dworshak fish hatchery. The proposed fifth and sixth units of the plant were deauthorized in 1990, and the fourth unit was deauthorized in 1995.
During initial filling of the reservoir, the dam developed several large vertical cracks on the upstream side – some more than 400 feet (120 m) long – due to the rapid change of water pressure from the rising reservoir. Workers had to drill 1.5 in (3.8 cm) diameter drain holes between the cracks and the dam's existing foundation drainage system, or "drainage gallery", at 5-foot (1.5 m) intervals, relieving the pressure on the dam's backside. In June 1980, the dam again experienced leakage problems when a 236-foot (72 m) crack opened on its upstream face, sending more than 17 cubic feet per second (0.48 m3/s) of water spraying across the downstream side of the dam. Seventy drainage holes were drilled into the crack to relieve pressure before the crack was permanently sealed by an aggregate of cement, volcanic ash and sawdust. The cost of the repair exceeded $1 million.
Dworshak Dam is a concrete gravity dam with a sloped downstream face and vertical upstream face, standing 717 feet (219 m) high from the foundations, 632 feet (193 m) above the riverbed and measuring 3,287 feet (1,002 m) long along its crest. The top of the dam is 44 feet (13 m) wide at an elevation of 1,613 feet (492 m) above sea level. The main body of the structure contains approximately 6,500,000 cubic yards (5,000,000 m3) of concrete. High water releases are controlled by a set of outlet works with four gates, capable of releasing 40,000 cubic feet per second (1,100 m3/s), and a spillway controlled by two 50.0 ft × 56.4 ft (15.2 m × 17.2 m) tainter gates. The spillway has a capacity of 150,000 cu ft/s (4,200 m3/s) at maximum reservoir elevation. Dworshak Reservoir is the name of the lake formed behind the dam. At normal maximum water levels of 1,600 feet (490 m) above sea level, the reservoir stretches 53 miles (85 km) upstream, covering 17,090 acres (69.2 km2) and containing 3,468,000 acre feet (4.278 km3) of water with 175 miles (282 km) of shoreline.
The hydroelectric plant located at the base of the dam is a 428-foot (130 m) long concrete structure and contains one 346,000 horsepower (hp) and two 142,000 hp (106,000 kW) turbines that power one 220 megawatt (MW) and two 90 MW generators, respectively, for a total capacity of 400 MW. The rated hydraulic head for the powerhouse is 560 feet (170 m), with a maximum of 632 feet (193 m) when the reservoir is full and a minimum of 417 feet (127 m) required for power generation. Up to 10,500 cubic feet per second (300 m3/s) of water can be released through the power plant at maximum capacity. The overload capacity of the two small units is 103.5 MW and for the large unit is 253.0 MW, for a total of 460 MW. If installed, Units 4, 5, and 6, each with a capacity of 220 MW, would bring the total generating capacity to 1,060 MW, making it one of the largest hydroelectric plants in Idaho.
The total usable storage capacity or active capacity of Dworshak Reservoir, including flood control, is 2,016,000 acre feet (2.487 km3). The inactive capacity (the portion of the reservoir's capacity below the power generating outlets and the lower river outlet works) is 682,000 acre feet (0.841 km3), and the dead pool (below the river outlet works) corresponds to a storage of 770,000 acre feet (0.95 km3). In addition, the reservoir has a surcharge capacity (above the spillway gates) of 92,000 acre feet (0.113 km3), bringing the maximum amount of water that can be retained behind the dam to 3,560,000 acre feet (4.39 km3).
Most of the active capacity not used for flood control is utilized for power production. Because the Lenore dam on the Clearwater River was never built, Dworshak cannot be used as a peaking power facility. Thus, the power plant is operated as a base load plant, with a relatively constant release. Discharge rates from the dam only increase significantly during high water summers, when flooding requires the opening of the spillways. The power plant generates an average of 1.693 billion KWh each year. Water releases from Dworshak Dam are also controlled to optimize power generation at four downstream dams on the Snake River and four more on the Columbia River.
Each winter, the level of Dworshak Reservoir is drawn down an average of 155 feet (47 m) to prepare for the North Fork's annual freshet, which once could reach more than 100,000 cu ft/s (2,800 m3/s) after a heavy snowmelt. The reservoir is required to maintain a minimum of 700,000 acre feet (0.86 km3) of winter flood-storage space, and dam releases are operated so that water levels reach a maximum of 1,570 feet (480 m) in July. However, annual flood control reservations vary with the amount of snowpack in the 2,440-square-mile (6,300 km2) drainage basin above the dam. The annual flood-control drawdown generally begins in September and ends on April 1 of the following year; snowmelt floods are captured in the reservoir between April and July. Although the reservoir covers more than 17,000 acres (69 km2) at full pool, the surface area decreases to 9,050 acres (36.6 km2) at the lowest point of the drawdown. Flood storage space in Dworshak can be interchanged with other major dams in the Columbia River system, including large Columbia mainstem dams such as Grand Coulee, depending on varying flood control requirements in the Columbia Basin.
Water releases from Dworshak are also timed to benefit Pacific salmon and steelhead migration in the Clearwater, Snake and Columbia Rivers. During late summer through the fall, large volumes of cold water are released through the dam's low level outlets to help cool water in downstream rivers, creating more suitable temperatures for these fish species. These environmental or "flow augmentation" releases significantly increase water levels during the late summer, with up to 14,600 cu ft/s (410 m3/s) being released through the dam in August and 10,400 cu ft/s (290 m3/s) in September. The temperature of the released water generally varies from 46 to 48 °F (8 to 9 °C).
Tourism and economy
One of the major benefits touted by proponents of the Dworshak Dam was that it would provide recreation and associated economic benefits to local residents. The annual visitation to Dworshak is estimated at between 110,000 and 140,000 people, mostly during the summer high water months. Recreational activities include boating, water-skiing, camping, fishing, hiking and hunting; six boat ramps lie adjacent to the reservoir. Idaho's Dworshak State Park is located on Dworshak Reservoir about 3 miles (5 km) north of the dam. The uppermost arm of the reservoir extends into the Clearwater National Forest. A regional visitor center is located at Dworshak Dam, and tours are available of the dam itself. However, the large annual drawdown of the reservoir causes boat ramps and marinas to be out of reach for months each year and an unsightly "bathtub ring" to be visible along the shoreline. A study by the University of Idaho calculated that this mode of operation causes the loss of between $4.5–5.9 million of tourism revenues each year.
The creation of a slackwater pool along 53 miles (85 km) of the North Fork formerly assisted logging operations in the region, although the scale of the lumber industry has decreased significantly since the 19th century. About 81 million board feet were transported on Dworshak Reservoir between 1988 and 1991; however, logs have not been barged on the lake since 1991. This is in part because of the implementation of a late-summer flow augmentation scheme that requires greater drawdowns of the reservoir, putting log-handling facilities well above the water level, and also because of the development of backcountry logging roads that allow more efficient transport by truck. It has been suggested that some of Dworshak's flood control space be shifted to Grand Coulee Dam in northern Washington in order to provide increased water for flow augmentation; this would carry the added benefits of improving recreation on the lake.
- "Dworshak Reservoir Overview". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Archived from the original on 2011-09-27. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Dworshak Dam and Reservoir Pertinent Data". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Archived from the original on 2012-02-16. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Dworshak Dam – General Information". Hydroelectric Information for Columbia and Snake River Projects. University of Washington School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences. 2008-12-22. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Dworshak Dam and Reservoir". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1997-06-17. Archived from the original on 2009-07-17. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Dworshak Dam". Building Big. Idaho Public Television. Archived from the original on 2012-04-21. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Engineers Start Surveys Of Snake River Damsites". The Idaho Daily Statesman. Associated Press. April 26, 1953.
- "Bill for Bruces Eddy, Asotin dam construction work signed". Lewiston Morning Tribune. (Idaho). Associated Press. October 25, 1962. p. 2.
- Combs 1999, p. 153.
- " 'Dworshak' Dam sought". Spokesman-Review. (Spokane, Washington). Associated Press. August 6, 1963. p. 10.
- "Engineer says Bruces Eddy plans provides for both logs and fish". Lewiston Morning Tribune. (Idaho). October 7, 1962. p. 14.
- "Are wildlife objections overstated?". Lewiston Morning Tribune. editorial. November 14, 1953. p. 4.
- Hollister, Hal (June 15, 1973). "A triumph and a dram of gall". Lewiston Morning Tribune. p. 6-Dworshak Dam section.
- Landers, Rich (2010-05-30). "Revival: Kokanee, bass and spring chinook having a big year in north-central Idaho". Spokesman Review. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- Combs 1999, pp. 153–154.
- Harrell, Sylvia (January 27, 1973). "Last massive bucket of concrete poured for giant Dworshak Dam". Lewiston Morning Tribune. (Idaho). p. 12.
- Mauser, G.; Cannamela, D,; Downing, R. (1989), Dworshak Dam Impact Assessment and Fishery Investigation, Bonneville Power Administration
|url=(help)CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- Miller, William H. (September 1987). "A Review of Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Mitigation Record" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Threat Is Seen in Lenore Dam". Spokane Daily Chronicle. November 17, 1970. p. 19.
- CETS 1983, pp. 200–201.
- "Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho". Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1997: Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Extract Report of the Walla Walla District. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1998-06-04. Archived from the original on 2009-01-10. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- Giovando, Jeremy; Dozier, Andre (2011). "Dworshak Dam–Storage Optimization: Improving Power Generation with Historic and Climate Change Hydrology" (PDF). Hydrology Days. Colorado State University. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Floods and flood control". Columbia River History. Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Retrieved 2012-06-22.
- "Final Environmental Impact Statement: Dworshak". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. September 1975. Archived from the original on 2009-06-19. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- Cook, C.B.; Richmond, M.C. (March 2004). "Simulating the Flow Field Upstream of the Dworshak Dam Regulating Outlets" (PDF). Technical Report PNNL–14591. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Retrieved 2012-06-17.
- "Appendix I: Dworshak Summer Operations" (PDF). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Retrieved 2012-06-17.
- "Dworshak State Park". State of Idaho Parks and Recreation. Archived from the original on 2012-06-18. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Orofino". Association of Idaho Cities. Archived from the original on 2012-03-21. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Black Rock is not a recreation site". Columbia Institute for Water Policy. 2007. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- "Dworshak Dam and Reservoir". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Retrieved 2012-06-22.
- Bellatty, Jim; et al. (2000-09-21). "Dworshak Operation Plan" (PDF). Idaho Department of Water Resources. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- Combs, Trey (1999). Steelhead Fly Fishing. Globe Pequot. ISBN 1-5582-1903-X.
- Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems (1983). Safety of Existing Dams: Evaluation and Improvement. The National Academies Press.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Dworshak Dam.|
- Dworshak Dam and Reservoir – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Dworshak Visitor Center - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- The Dworshak Dam Collection from the University of Idaho Library Digital Collections – Digitized photographs and documents pertaining to the planning, development and construction of the Dworshak Dam, featuring documents and photographs detailing both the legislative and physical development of the dam.