Electrical network frequency (ENF) analysis is an audio forensics technique for validating audio recordings by comparing frequency changes in background mains hum in the recording with long-term high-precision historical records of mains frequency changes from a database. In effect the mains hum signal is treated as if it were a time-dependent digital watermark that can help identify when the recording was created, detect edits in the recording, or disprove tampering of a recording. Historical records of mains frequency changes are kept on record, e.g., by police in the German federal state of Bavaria since 2010 and the United Kingdom Metropolitan Police since 2005.
The technology has been hailed as "the most significant development in audio forensics since Watergate." However, according to a paper by Huijbregtse and Geradts, the ENF technique, although powerful, has significant limitations caused by ambiguity based on fixed frequency offsets during recording, and self-similarity within the mains frequency database, particularly for recordings shorter than 10 minutes.
More recently, researchers demonstrated that indoor lights such as fluorescent lights and incandescent bulbs vary their light intensity in accordance with the voltage supplied, which in turn depends on the voltage supply frequency. As a result, the light intensity can carry the frequency fluctuation information to the visual sensor recordings in a similar way as the electromagnetic waves from the power transmission lines carry the ENF information to audio sensing mechanisms. Based on this result, researchers demonstrated that visual track from still video taken in indoor lighting environments also contain ENF traces that can be extracted by estimating the frequency at which ENF will appear in a video as low sampling frequency of video (25–30 Hz) cause significant aliasing. It was also demonstrated in the same research that the ENF signatures from the visual stream and the ENF signature from the audio stream in a given video should match. As a result, the matching between the two signals can be used to determine if the audio and visual track were recorded together or superimposed later.
Use by law enforcement
- Cooper, A.J: "The electric network frequency (ENF) as an aid to authenticating forensic digital audio recordings – an automated approach". June 2008., Conference paper, AES 33rd International Conference, USA (2008)
- Grigoras, C. : "Digital audio recording analysis – the electric network frequency criterion"., International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 63–76 (2005)
- Mateusz Kajstura, Agata Trawinska, Jacek Hebenstreit. "Application of the Electrical Network Frequency (ENF) Criterion: A case of a digital recording". Forensic Science International, Volume 155, Issue 2, Pages 165–171 (20 December 2005)
- Williams, Christopher (June 1, 2010). "Met lab claims 'biggest breakthrough since Watergate'". The Register. Retrieved September 15, 2021.
- "Dem Verbrechen auf der Spur" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2011-02-16.
- Maarten Huijbregtse, Zeno Geradts. "Using the ENF criterion for determining the time of recording of short digital audio recordings" (PDF). Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 5718, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computational Forensics, 2009.
- Garg Ravi, Varna Avinash L., Wu Min: "Seeing" ENF: natural time stamp for digital video via optical sensing and signal processing. 28 November 2011. pp. 23–32. doi:10.1145/2072298.2072303. ISBN 9781450306164. S2CID 8009218., Conference paper, in proceedings of the 19th international ACM Multimedia Conference, USA (2011)
- Garg, Ravi. "Research Projects". ece.umd.edu. Archived from the original on 2012-08-05.
- Morelle, Rebecca (12 December 2012). "The hum that helps to fight crime". Retrieved 27 January 2017.