File talk:2005grape.PNG
Appearance
![]() | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]I do believe that this is going to need to be edited to reflect California's production of Grapes as well. It is famous for producing a large amount specifically for wine, and I'm surprised that this map doesn't reflect that.
St. Fenix 16:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- California will be included in the map when it declares independence and becomes a republic.Anwar 18:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- I believe there might be confusion because all the "bubbles" for the United States are clustered on the East Coast. This makes it appear that the map depicts grape production in specific regions. From your response can we assume the map depicts grape production only by nation, and not by specific location? Perhaps the bubbles could be moved to the center of each nation. Just a suggestion. --Bridgecross (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Possibly a color coordinated map where all nations producing less than 10 percent are simply gray would be better. I will remove this image (due to the fact it can be very misleading) from the articles that have it linked in one month if this is not corrected.Taboo Tongue (talk) 06:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Glad you agree; following up. It has been more than a few months. Issue; poorly constructed map give appearance of regional data when in fact it only contains national data. I am removing from article. --Bridgecross (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have reverted your vandalism. Replace only if a suitable alternative meeting your specifications is found. Anwar (talk) 07:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- I kindly take issue with your characterization of my edit as "vandalism." 1) There was a reasonable discussion here about the edit. I did not disfigure the article, and there was no malicious intent. 2) If there is a graphic which does not do the job properly, it is better to have no graphic at all. The article works just fine without a map, and it works even better without a misleading map. Are you the original creator, and if so, can YOU fix the map so that it is not misleading? If you believe the map is just fine the way it is, please explain. --Bridgecross (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Someone make a better image already. I too was confused at why California was missing from the map. -anon
- I kindly take issue with your characterization of my edit as "vandalism." 1) There was a reasonable discussion here about the edit. I did not disfigure the article, and there was no malicious intent. 2) If there is a graphic which does not do the job properly, it is better to have no graphic at all. The article works just fine without a map, and it works even better without a misleading map. Are you the original creator, and if so, can YOU fix the map so that it is not misleading? If you believe the map is just fine the way it is, please explain. --Bridgecross (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Discussion moved to Talk:Grape
- Nyuk nyuk nyuk! --Bridgecross (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)