Fisherian runaway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lembit Staan (talk | contribs) at 20:55, 2 May 2012 (→‎Human sexual selection: rm section which establishes no connection to the topic of the article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

File:R. A. Fischer.jpg
R. A. Fisher

Fisherian runaway is a model of sexual selection, first proposed by R.A. Fisher in 1915,[1] and expanded upon in his 1930 book The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection,[2] that suggests an explanation for sexual selection of traits that do not obviously increase fitness of survival, based upon a positive feedback "runaway" mechanism.

Explanation

The peacock is a classic example of the runaway process.

Fisher's explanation is that selection of such traits is a result of sexual preference; that members of the opposite sex find a trait desirable. This preference makes the trait advantageous, which in a circular fashion makes having a preference for the trait advantageous.

The process is termed "runaway" because over time, it would facilitate the development of greater preference and more pronounced traits, until the costs of producing the trait balance the reproductive benefit of possessing it.

By way of example, the peacock's tail requires a great deal of energy to grow and maintain, it reduces the bird's agility, and it may increase the animal's visibility to predators. Yet it has evolved, indicating that birds with longer tails have some advantage.

Fisherian runaway explains that if a peahen selects a peacock with a longer and more colorful tail, then her male children are more likely to have long and colorful tails and are more likely to be sexually successful themselves, because other peahens have the same preference for longer tails. Given this preexisting pattern, having a preference for longer and more colorful tails gives an advantage just as having a longer and more colorful tail does. However, all members of the species are less well off than they would be if none of the peahens (or only a small number) had a preference for a longer or more colorful tail, because in the absence of such a preference, the possession of these maladaptive traits respectively reducing mobility and increasing visibility to predators would no longer be incentivized.

See also

References

  1. ^ Fisher, R.A. 1915 The evolution of sexual preference, Eugenics Review 7: 184-192
  2. ^ Fisher, R.A. 1930 The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford

Further reading