Graphene morphology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Monolayer sheets[edit]

In 2013 researchers developed a production unit that produces continuous monolayer sheets of high-strength monolayer graphene (HSMG).[1] The process is based on graphene growth on a liquid metal matrix.[2]


Bilayer graphene displays the anomalous quantum Hall effect, a tunable band gap[3] and potential for excitonic condensation.[4] Bilayer graphene typically can be found either in twisted configurations where the two layers are rotated relative to each other or graphitic Bernal stacked configurations where half the atoms in one layer lie atop half the atoms in the other.[5] Stacking order and orientation govern its optical and electronic properties.

One synthesis method is chemical vapor deposition, which can produce large bilayer regions that almost exclusively conform to a Bernal stack geometry.[5]


Periodically stacked graphene and its insulating isomorph provide a fascinating structural element in implementing highly functional superlattices at the atomic scale, which offers possibilities in designing nanoelectronic and photonic devices. Various types of superlattices can be obtained by stacking graphene and its related forms.[6][7] The energy band in layer-stacked superlattices is more sensitive to the barrier width than that in conventional III–V semiconductor superlattices. When adding more than one atomic layer to the barrier in each period, the coupling of electronic wavefunctions in neighboring potential wells can be significantly reduced, which leads to the degeneration of continuous subbands into quantized energy levels. When varying the well width, the energy levels in the potential wells along the L-M direction behave distinctly from those along the K-H direction.

Precisely aligned graphene on h-BN always produces giant superlattice known as Moiré pattern.[8] Moiré patterns are observed and the sensitivity of moiré interferometry proves that the graphene grains can align precisely with the underlying h-BN lattice within an error of less than 0.05°. The occurrence of moiré pattern clearly indicates that the graphene locks into h-BN via van der Waals epitaxy with its interfacial stress greatly released.

The existence of the giant Moiré pattern in graphene nanoribbon (GNR) embedded in hBN indicates that the graphene was highly crystalline and precisely aligned with the h-BN underneath. It was noticed that the Moiré pattern appeared to be stretched along the GNR, while it appeared relaxed laterally.[9] This trend differs from regular hexagons with a periodicity of ∼14 nm, which have always been observed with well-aligned graphene domains on h-BN. This observation gives a strong indication of the in-plane epitaxy between the graphene and the h-BN at the edges of the trench, where the graphene is stretched by tensile strain along the ribbon, due to a lattice mismatch between the graphene and h-BN.


Graphene nanoribbons ("nanostripes" in the "zig-zag" orientation), at low temperatures, show spin-polarized metallic edge currents, which suggest spintronics applications. (In the "armchair" orientation, the edges behave like semiconductors.[10])


In 2011, researchers reported making fibers using chemical vapor deposition grown graphene films.[11] The method was scalable and controllable, delivering tunable morphology and pore structure by controlling the evaporation of solvents with suitable surface tension. Flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors based on such fibers were demonstrated in 2013.[12]

In 2015 intercalating small graphene fragments into the gaps formed by larger, coiled graphene sheets after annealing provided pathways for conduction, while the fragments helped reinforce the fibers.[sentence fragment] The resulting fibers offered better thermal and electrical conductivity and mechanical strength. Thermal conductivity reached 1290 watts per meter per kelvin, while tensile strength reached 1080 megapascals.[13]

In 2016, kilometer-scale continuous graphene fibers with outstanding mechanical properties and excellent electrical conductivity were produced by high-throughput wet-spinning of graphene oxide liquid crystals followed by graphitization through a full-scale synergetic defect-engineering strategy.[14]


In 2013, a three-dimensional honeycomb of hexagonally arranged carbon was termed 3D graphene. Self-supporting 3D graphene was produced that year.[15] Researchers at Stony Brook University have reported a novel radical-initiated crosslinking method to fabricate porous 3D free-standing architectures of graphene and carbon nanotubes using nanomaterials as building blocks without any polymer matrix as support.[16] 3D structures can be fabricated by using either CVD or solution-based methods. A 2016 review summarized the techniques for fabrication of 3D graphene and other related two-dimensional materials.[17] These 3D graphene (all-carbon) scaffolds/foams have potential applications in fields such as energy storage, filtration, thermal management and biomedical devices and implants.[17][18]

In 2016 box-shaped graphene (BSG) nanostructure resulted from mechanical cleavage of pyrolytic graphite.[19] The discovered nanostructure is a multilayer system of parallel hollow nanochannels located along the surface that displayed quadrangular cross-section. The thickness of the channel walls is approximately equal to 1 nm. Potential applications include: ultra-sensitive detectors, high-performance catalytic cells, nanochannels for DNA sequencing and manipulation, high-performance heat sinking surfaces, rechargeable batteries of enhanced performance, nanomechanical resonators, electron multiplication channels in emission nanoelectronic devices, high-capacity sorbents for safe hydrogen storage.

Three dimensional bilayer graphene was reported in 2012[20] and 2014.[21]


In 2017 researchers simulated a graphene gyroid that has five percent of the density of steel, yet is ten times as strong with an enormous surface area to volume ratio. They compressed heated graphene flakes. They then constructed high resolution 3D-printed models of plastic of various configurations – similar to the gyroids that graphene form naturally, though thousands of times larger. These shapes were then tested for tensile strength and compression, and compared to the computer simulations. When the graphene was swapped out for polymers or metals, similar gains in strength were seen.[22][23]

A film of graphene soaked in solvent to make it swell and become malleable was overlaid on an underlying substrate "former". The solvent evaporated, leaving behind a layer of graphene that had taken on the shape of the underlying structure. In this way the team[who?] was able to produce a range of relatively intricate micro-structured shapes.[24] Features vary from 3.5 to 50 μm. Pure graphene and gold-decorated graphene were each successfully integrated with the substrate.[25]

An aerogel made of graphene layers separated by carbon nanotubes was measured at 0.16 milligrams per cubic centimeter. A solution of graphene and carbon nanotubes in a mold is freeze dried to dehydrate the solution, leaving the aerogel. The material has superior elasticity and absorption. It can recover completely after more than 90% compression, and absorb up to 900 times its weight in oil, at a rate of 68.8 grams per second.[26]

At the end of 2017, fabrication of freestanding graphene gyroids with 35nm and 60nm unit cells was reported.[27] The gyroids were made via controlled direct chemical vapor deposition and are self-supporting and can be transferred onto a variety of substrates. Furthermore, they represent the smallest free standing periodic graphene 3D structures yet produced with a pore size of tens of nm. Due to their high mechanical strength, good conductivity (sheet resistance : 240 Ω/sq) and huge ratio of surface area per volume, the graphene gyroids might find their way to various applications, ranging from batteries and supercapacitors to filtration and optoelectronics.


Pillared graphene is a hybrid carbon structure consisting of an oriented array of carbon nanotubes connected at each end to a graphene sheet. It was first described theoretically in 2008. Pillared graphene has not been synthesized in the laboratory.


Graphene sheets reinforced with embedded carbon nanotubes ("rebar") are easier to manipulate, while improving the electrical and mechanical qualities of both materials.[28][29]

Functionalized single- or multiwalled carbon nanotubes are spin-coated on copper foils and then heated and cooled, using the nanotubes as the carbon source. Under heating, the functional carbon groups decompose into graphene, while the nanotubes partially split and form in-plane covalent bonds with the graphene, adding strength. π–π stacking domains add more strength. The nanotubes can overlap, making the material a better conductor than standard CVD-grown graphene. The nanotubes effectively bridge the grain boundaries found in conventional graphene. The technique eliminates the traces of substrate on which later-separated sheets were deposited using epitaxy.[28]

Stacks of a few layers have been proposed as a cost-effective and physically flexible replacement for indium tin oxide (ITO) used in displays and photovoltaic cells.[28]


In 2015 a coiled form of graphene was discovered in graphitic carbon (coal). The spiraling effect is produced by defects in the material's hexagonal grid that causes it to spiral along its edge, mimicking a Riemann surface, with the graphene surface approximately perpendicular to the axis. When voltage is applied to such a coil, current flows around the spiral, producing a magnetic field. The phenomenon applies to spirals with either zigzag or armchair orientations, although with different current distributions. Computer simulations indicated that a conventional spiral inductor of 205 microns in diameter could be matched by a nanocoil just 70 nanometers wide, with a field strength reaching as much as 1 tesla, about the same as the coils found in typical loudspeakers, about the same field strength as some MRI machines. They found the magnetic field would be strongest in the hollow, nanometer-wide cavity at the spiral's center.[30]

A solenoid made with such a coil behaves as a quantum conductor whose current distribution between the core and exterior varies with applied voltage, resulting in nonlinear inductance.[31]


  1. ^ "Single and Multilayer Growth of Graphene from the Liquid Phase". Retrieved 2015-07-01. 
  2. ^ "Polish scientists find way to make super-strong graphene sheets | Graphene-Info". Retrieved 2015-07-01. 
  3. ^ Min, Hongki; Sahu, Bhagawan; Banerjee, Sanjay; MacDonald, A. (2007). "Ab initio theory of gate induced gaps in graphene bilayers". Physical Review B. 75 (15): 155115. arXiv:cond-mat/0612236Freely accessible. Bibcode:2007PhRvB..75o5115M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155115. 
  4. ^ Barlas, Yafis; Côté, R.; Lambert, J.; MacDonald, A. H. (2010). "Anomalous Exciton Condensation in Graphene Bilayers". Physical Review Letters. 104 (9): 96802. arXiv:0909.1502Freely accessible. Bibcode:2010PhRvL.104i6802B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.096802. PMID 20367001. 
  5. ^ a b Min, Lola; Hovden, Robert; Huang, Pinshane; Wojcik, Michal; Muller, David A.; Park, Jiwoong (2012). "Twinning and Twisting of Tri- and Bilayer Graphene". Nano Letters. 12 (3): 1609–1615. Bibcode:2012NanoL..12.1609B. doi:10.1021/nl204547v. PMID 22329410. 
  6. ^ Nandwana, Dinkar; Ertekin, Elif (11 March 2015). "Ripples, Strain, and Misfit Dislocations: Structure of Graphene–Boron Nitride Superlattice Interfaces". Nano Letters. 15 (3): 1468–1475. Bibcode:2015NanoL..15.1468N. doi:10.1021/nl505005t. 
  7. ^ Xu, Yang; Liu, Yunlong; Chen, Huabin; Lin, Xiao; Lin, Shisheng; Yu, Bin; Luo, Jikui (2012). "Ab initio study of energy-band modulation ingraphene-based two-dimensional layered superlattices". Journal of Materials Chemistry. 22: 23821. doi:10.1039/C2JM35652J. 
  8. ^ Tang, Shujie; Wang, Haomin; Zhang, Yu (2013). "Precisely aligned graphene grown on hexagonal boron nitride by catalyst free chemical vapor deposition". Scientific Reports. 3: 2666. arXiv:1309.0172Freely accessible. Bibcode:2013NatSR...3E2666T. doi:10.1038/srep02666. 
  9. ^ Chen, Lingxiu; He, Li; Wang, Huishan (2017). "Oriented graphene nanoribbons embedded in hexagonal boron nitride trenches". Nature Communications. 8: 14703. arXiv:1703.03145Freely accessible. Bibcode:2017NatCo...814703C. doi:10.1038/ncomms14703. 
  10. ^ Neto, A Castro; Peres, N. M. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Geim, A. K. (2009). "The electronic properties of graphene" (PDF). Rev Mod Phys. 81: 109–162. arXiv:0709.1163Freely accessible. Bibcode:2009RvMP...81..109C. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-11-15. 
  11. ^ Li, Xinming; Zhao, Tianshuo; Wang, Kunlin; Yang, Ying; Wei, Jinquan; Kang, Feiyu; Wu, Dehai; Zhu, Hongwei (29 August 2011). "Directly Drawing Self-Assembled, Porous, and Monolithic Graphene Fiber from Chemical Vapor Deposition Grown Graphene Film and Its Electrochemical Properties". Langmuir. 27 (19): 12164–71. doi:10.1021/la202380g. PMID 21875131. 
  12. ^ "Flexible all solid-state supercapacitors based on chemical vapor deposition derived graphene fibers". 3 September 2013. 
  13. ^ Xin, Guoqing; Yao, Tiankai; Sun, Hongtao; Scott, Spencer Michael; Shao, Dali; Wang, Gongkai; Lian, Jie (4 September 2015). "Highly thermally conductive and mechanically strong graphene fibers". Science. 349: 1083–1087. Bibcode:2015Sci...349.1083X. doi:10.1126/science.aaa6502. PMID 26339027. 
  14. ^ Xu, Zhen; Liu, Yingjun; Zhao, Xiaoli; Li, Peng; Sun, Haiyan; Xu, Yang; Ren, Xibiao; Jin, Chuanhong; Xu, Peng; Wang, Miao; Gao, Chao (2016). "Ultrastiff and Strong Graphene Fibers via Full-Scale Synergetic Defect Engineering". Advanced Materials. 28: 6449–6456. doi:10.1002/adma.201506426. 
  15. ^ Wang, H.; Sun, K.; Tao, F.; Stacchiola, D. J.; Hu, Y. H. (2013). "3D Honeycomb-Like Structured Graphene and Its High Efficiency as a Counter-Electrode Catalyst for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells". Angewandte Chemie. 125 (35): 9380–9384. doi:10.1002/ange.201303497. 
    Wang, Hui; Sun, Kai; Tao, Franklin; Stacchiola, Dario J.; Hu, Yun Hang (2013). "3D graphene could replace expensive platinum in solar cells". Angewandte Chemie. KurzweilAI. 125 (35): 9380–9384. doi:10.1002/ange.201303497. Retrieved 24 August 2013. 
  16. ^ Lalwani, Gaurav; Trinward Kwaczala, Andrea; Kanakia, Shruti; Patel, Sunny C.; Judex, Stefan; Sitharaman, Balaji (2013). "Fabrication and characterization of three-dimensional macroscopic all-carbon scaffolds". Carbon. 53: 90–100. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.035. PMC 3578711Freely accessible. PMID 23436939. 
  17. ^ a b Shehzad, Khurram; Xu, Yang; Gao, Chao; Xianfeng, Duan (2016). "Three-dimensional macro-structures of two-dimensional nanomaterials". Chemical Society Reviews. 45: 5541–5588. doi:10.1039/C6CS00218H. Retrieved 4 October 2016. 
  18. ^ Lalwani, Gaurav; Gopalan, Anu Gopalan; D'Agati, Michael; Srinivas Sankaran, Jeyantt; Judex, Stefan; Qin, Yi-Xian; Sitharaman, Balaji (2015). "Porous three-dimensional carbon nanotube scaffolds for tissue engineering". Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 103 (10): 3212–3225. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35449. PMC 4552611Freely accessible. PMID 25788440. 
  19. ^ R. V. Lapshin (2016). "STM observation of a box-shaped graphene nanostructure appeared after mechanical cleavage of pyrolytic graphite" (PDF). Applied Surface Science. Netherlands: Elsevier B. V. 360: 451–460. arXiv:1611.04379Freely accessible. Bibcode:2016ApSS..360..451L. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.222. ISSN 0169-4332. 
  20. ^ Harris PJF (2012). "Hollow structures with bilayer graphene walls". Carbon. 50: 3195–3199. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.050. 
  21. ^ Harris PJ, Slater TJ, Haigh SJ, Hage FS, Kepaptsoglou DM, Ramasse QM, Brydson R (2014). "Bilayer graphene formed by passage of current through graphite: evidence for a three dimensional structure". Nanotechnology. 25: 465601. Bibcode:2014Nanot..25.5601H. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/25/46/465601. 
  22. ^ Szondy, David (January 9, 2017). "New 3D graphene is ten times as strong as steel". Retrieved 2017-02-17. 
  23. ^ Zhao, Qin; Gang, Seob Jung; Min, Jeong Kang; Buehler, Markus J. (2017-01-06). "The mechanics and design of a lightweight three-dimensional graphene assembly". Science Advances. 3 (1): e1601536. Bibcode:2017SciA....3E1536Q. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601536. 
  24. ^ Jeffrey, Colin (28 June 2015). "Graphene takes on a new dimension". Retrieved 2015-10-05. 
  25. ^ "How to form 3-D shapes from flat sheets of graphene". 30 June 2015. Retrieved 2015-10-05. 
  26. ^ Anthony, Sebastian (10 April 2013). "Graphene aerogel is seven times lighter than air, can balance on a blade of grass - Slideshow | ExtremeTech". ExtremeTech. Retrieved 2015-10-11. 
  27. ^ Cebo, T.; Aria, A. I.; Dolan, J.A.; Weatherup, R. S.; Nakanishi, K.; Kidambi, P. R.; Divitini, G.; Ducati, C.; Steiner, U.; Hofmann, S. (2017). "Chemical vapour deposition of freestanding sub-60 nm graphene gyroids". Appl. Phys. Let. 111 (25): 253103. Bibcode:2017ApPhL.111y3103C. doi:10.1063/1.4997774. 
  28. ^ a b c "Carbon nanotubes as reinforcing bars to strengthen graphene and increase conductivity". KurzweilAI. 9 April 2014. Retrieved 23 April 2014. 
  29. ^ Yan, Z.; Peng, Z.; Casillas, G.; Lin, J.; Xiang, C.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y.; Ruan, G.; Raji, A. R. O.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Hauge, R. H.; Yacaman, M. J.; Tour, J. M. (2014). "Rebar Graphene". ACS Nano. 8: 140407122527007. doi:10.1021/nn501132n. 
  30. ^ "Graphene nano-coils discovered to be powerful natural electromagnets | KurzweilAI". 16 October 2015. Retrieved 2015-10-18. 
  31. ^ Xu, Fangbo; Yu, Henry; Sadrzadeh, Arta; Yakobson, Boris I. (2015-10-14). "Riemann Surfaces of Carbon as Graphene Nanosolenoids". Nano Letters. 16: 151014085427001. Bibcode:2016NanoL..16...34X. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02430. PMID 26452145.