View source for Göbekli Tepe

{{Short description|Neolithic archaeological site in Turkey}}
{{pp-semi-indef|small=yes}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2021}}
{{Use shortened footnotes|date=June 2024}}
{{Infobox ancient site
| name = Göbekli Tepe
| native_name = {{Plainlist|
* Girê Mirazan
* Xirabreşkê
}}
| native_name_lang = ku
| alternate_name = <!-- displays as "Alternative name" -->
| image = Göbekli Tepe, Urfa.jpg
| alt = Photograph of the main excavation area of Göbekli Tepe, showing the ruins of several prehistoric structures.
| caption = View overlooking the main excavation area of Göbekli Tepe
| map = 
| map_type = Turkey#Near East
| map_caption = 
| map_size = 220
| mapframe = no
| altitude_m = <!-- Enter a number for altitude in meters (m) -->
| altitude_ref = 
| relief = yes
| coordinates = {{coord|37|13|25|N|38|55|18|E|type:landmark_region:TR|display=inline,title}}
| gbgridref = 
| map_dot_label = 
| location = [[Şanlıurfa Province]], Turkey
| region = [[Southeastern Anatolia Region|Southeastern Anatolia]]
| type = Settlement
| part_of = 
| length = 
| width = 
| area = 
| height = 
| builder = 
| material = 
| built = {{circa|{{BCE|9500}}}} (11450 BP){{sfn|Clare|2020}}
| abandoned = {{circa|{{BCE|8000}}}} (9950 BP){{sfn|Clare|2020}}
| epochs = {{Plainlist|
* [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic A]]
* [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]]
}}
| cultures = 
| dependency_of = 
| occupants = 
| event = 
| discovered = 1963
| excavations = 1995–present
| archaeologists = {{Plainlist|
* [[Klaus Schmidt (archaeologist)|Klaus Schmidt]]
* Necmi Karul
* Lee Clare
}}
| condition = Well-preserved
| ownership = Turkey
| management = 
| public_access = Limited
| other_designation =
| website = 
| architectural_styles =
| architectural_details =
<!-- UNESCO World Heritage Site -->
| designation1 = WHS
| designation1_offname = Göbekli Tepe
| designation1_date = 2018 (42nd session)
| designation1_type = Cultural
| designation1_criteria = (i), (ii), (iv)
| designation1_number = [https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1572 1572]
| designation1_free1name = Region
| designation1_free1value = [[List of World Heritage Sites in Western Asia|Western Asia]]
}}
'''Göbekli Tepe''' ({{IPA|tr|ɟœbecˈli teˈpe|lang}},{{sfn|''Forvo Pronunciation Dictionary''}} {{gloss|Potbelly Hill}};{{sfn|Symmes|2010}} [[Kurdish languages|Kurdish]]: {{lang|ku-Latn|Girê Mirazan}} or {{lang|ku-Latn|Xerabreşkê}}, 'Wish Hill'{{sfn|Kosen|2019}}) is a [[Neolithic]] [[Archaeology|archaeological]] site in the [[Southeastern Anatolia Region]] of Turkey. The settlement was inhabited from around {{BCE|9500}} to at least {{BCE|8000}},{{Sfn|Breuers|Kinzel|2022|p=471}} during the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic]]. It is famous for its large circular structures that contain massive stone pillars{{Snd}}among the world's oldest known [[megalith]]s. Many of these pillars are decorated with [[anthropomorphic]] details, clothing, and [[Relief|sculptural reliefs]] of wild animals, providing archaeologists rare insights into [[prehistoric religion]] and the particular iconography of the period. The {{cvt|15|m|-1}} high, {{cvt|8|ha|adj=on}} [[tell (archaeology)|tell]] is densely covered with ancient domestic structures{{Sfn|Schönicke|2019|p=214}} and other small buildings, quarries, and stone-cut [[cistern]]s from the Neolithic, as well as some traces of activity from later periods.

Current excavators interpret Göbekli Tepe as a settlement, based on recent findings such as domestic structures and features, [[water supply]] installations, and Neolithic tools associated with domestic use.{{Sfn|Schönicke|2019|p=214-215}} The site's original excavator [[Klaus Schmidt (archaeologist)|Klaus Schmidt]] had described it as a [[sanctuary]] used by groups of nomadic [[hunter-gatherer]]s from a wide area, with few or no permanent inhabitants.{{sfn|Clare|2020}} 

The site was first used at the dawn of the [[Southwest Asia]]n [[Neolithic period]], which marked the appearance of the oldest permanent [[human settlement]]s anywhere in the world. Prehistorians link this [[Neolithic Revolution]] to the advent of agriculture, but disagree on whether farming caused people to settle down or vice versa. Göbekli Tepe, a monumental complex built on the top of a rocky mountaintop, with no clear evidence of agricultural cultivation produced to date, has played a prominent role in this debate. Archaeological evidence suggests that the inhabitants processed [[cereal]] at the site, though it is unclear whether it was wild or cultivated. 

No definitive purpose has been determined for the megalithic enclosures; Schmidt had described them as the "world's first temple[s]", but incorrectly surmised that they were intentionally and ritually backfilled. Recent stratigraphic studies have instead revealed that they were filled by slope slide events, and sometimes repaired and modified thereafter.{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2013}} The architecture and iconography is not unique to the site, with over a half-dozen other similar sites like [[Karahan Tepe]] having been found across modern [[Şanlıurfa Province]], dating to approximately the same time period.{{sfn|Caletti|2020}}

The site was first noted in a [[archaeological survey|survey]] in 1963. Schmidt recognized its significance in 1994 and began excavations there the following year. After his death in 2014, work continued as a joint project of [[Istanbul University]], [[Şanlıurfa Museum]], and the [[German Archaeological Institute]], under the direction of Turkish prehistorian Necmi Karul. Göbekli Tepe was designated a [[List of World Heritage Sites in Turkey|UNESCO World Heritage Site]] in 2018, recognising its outstanding universal value as "one of the first manifestations of human-made monumental architecture".{{sfn|''UNESCO World Heritage Centre''}} {{As of|2015}}, less than 5% of the site had been excavated.{{sfn|Strebe|2015}} Additional areas were examined by [[Geophysical survey|geophysical surveys]], which showed the mound to contain at least 20 large enclosures.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Klaus |first=Schmidt |title=The 2003 Campaign at Göbekli Tepe (Southeastern Turkey) |url=https://www.exoriente.org/docs/00046.pdf#page=3 |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=2003 |issue=2 |pages=3-8}}</ref>

== Geography and environment ==
[[File:Göbekli Tepe surrounding area.JPG|thumb|Present day landscape around Göbekli Tepe]]Göbekli Tepe is located in the [[Taş Tepeler]] ('Stone Hills'), in the foothills of the [[Taurus Mountains]].{{sfn|Clare et al.|2017|p=17}} It overlooks the [[Harran plain]] and the headwaters of the [[Balikh River]], a tributary of the [[Euphrates]].{{sfn|Clare et al.|2017|p=17}} The site is a [[tell (archaeology)|tell]] (artificial mound) on a flat [[limestone]] plateau.{{sfn|Knitter et al.|2019}} In the north, the plateau is connected to the neighbouring mountains by a narrow promontory. In all other directions, the ridge descends steeply into slopes and steep cliffs.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|p=102}}

The climate of the area was warmer and wetter when Göbekli Tepe was occupied than it is today.{{sfn|Knitter et al.|2019}} The site was surrounded by an open [[steppe]] grassland,{{sfn|Knitter et al.|2019}} with abundant wild cereals, including [[einkorn]], wheat, and [[barley]],{{sfn|Neef|2003}} and herds of grazing animals such as [[wild sheep]], [[wild goat]], [[gazelle]], and [[equid]]s.{{sfn|Peters et al.|2013}} Large herds of [[goitered gazelle]] may have passed by the site in seasonal migrations.{{sfn|Lang et al.|2013}} There is no evidence of substantial [[woodland]]s nearby;{{sfn|Knitter et al.|2019}} 90% of the charcoal recovered at the site was from [[pistachio]] or [[almond]] trees.{{sfn|Neef|2003|p=14}}

Like most Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN) sites in the Urfa region, Göbekli Tepe was built on a high point on the edge of the mountains, giving it both a wide view over the plain beneath, and good visibility from the plain.{{sfn|Moetz|Çelik|2012}} This location also gave the builders good access to raw material: the soft limestone bedrock from which the complex was built, and the flint to make the tools to work the limestone.{{sfn|Moetz|Çelik|2012}} The prehistoric village acquired drinking water through a [[rainwater harvesting]] system, consisting of carved channels{{Sfn|Clare|2020|p=84-85}} that fed several [[cistern]]s carved into the bedrock under the site,{{sfn|Herrmann|Schmidt|2012}} which could hold at least {{convert|150|m3}} of water.{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2019}}{{sfn|Curry|2021}} Additionally, the local [[water table]] may have been higher, activating springs closer to the site which are dormant today.{{sfn|Banning|2011}}

Excavations have taken place at the southern slope of the tell, south, and west of a [[mulberry]] that marks an [[Pilgrimage|Islamic pilgrimage]],{{sfn|Schmidt|2009|p=188}} but archaeological finds come from the entire plateau. The team has also found many remains of tools. At the western [[escarpment]], a small cave has been discovered in which a small [[relief]] depicting a [[bovid]] was found. It is the only relief found in this cave.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|p=111}}

== Dawn of village life ==
Göbekli Tepe was built and occupied during the earliest part of the Southwest Asian [[Neolithic]], known as the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic]] (PPN, {{BCE|{{Circa|9600}}–7000}}).{{sfn|Gresky|Haelm|Clare|2017}} Beginning at the end of the [[Pleistocene|last Ice Age]], the PPN marks "the beginnings of village life",{{sfn|Banning|2002}} producing the earliest evidence for permanent [[human settlement]]s in the world.{{sfn|Banning|2002}}{{sfn|Watkins|2017}} Archaeologists have long associated the appearance of these settlements with the [[Neolithic Revolution]]—the transition from [[hunting and gathering]] to agriculture—but disagree on whether the adoption of farming caused people to settle down, or settling down caused people to adopt farming.{{sfn|Watkins|2010}} Despite the name, the Neolithic Revolution in Southwest Asia was "drawn out and locally variable".{{sfn|Hodder|2018}} Elements of village life appeared as early as 10,000 years before the Neolithic in places,{{sfn|Zeder|Smith|2009}}{{sfn|Maher|Richter|Stock|2012}} and the transition to agriculture took thousands of years, with different paces and trajectories in different regions.{{sfn|Fuller|Willcox|Allaby|2012}}{{sfn|Arbuckle|2014}} Archaeologists divide the Pre-Pottery Neolithic into two subperiods: the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic A]] (PPNA, {{BCE|{{Circa|9600}}–8800 }}) and the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]] (PPNB, {{Circa|8800}} and {{BCE|7000}}).{{sfn|Watkins|2017}} The earliest phases at Göbekli Tepe have been dated to the PPNA; later phases to the PPNB.{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|pp=32–33}}

Evidence indicates the inhabitants of Göbekli Tepe were [[hunter-gatherer]]s who supplemented their diet with early forms of domesticated cereal and lived in villages for at least part of the year. Tools such as grinding stones and mortars and pestles found at the site have been analyzed and suggest considerable cereal processing. Archaeozoological evidence hints at "large-scale hunting of gazelle between midsummer and autumn."{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2019}}

PPN villages consisted mainly of clusters of stone or [[mud brick]] houses,{{sfn|Banning|2002}} but sometimes also substantial monuments and large buildings.{{sfn|Watkins|2017}} These include the tower and walls at [[Tell es-Sultan]] (Jericho), as well as large, roughly contemporaneous circular buildings at Göbekli Tepe, [[Nevalı Çori]], [[Çayönü]], [[Wadi Feynan 16]], [[Jerf el Ahmar|Jerf el-Ahmar]], [[Tell 'Abr 3]], and [[Tepe Asiab]].{{sfn|Richter et al.|2021|p=2}} Archaeologists typically associate these structures with communal activities which, together with the communal effort needed to build them, helped to maintain social interactions in PPN communities as they grew in size.{{sfn|Richter et al.|2021|pp=15–17}}

The T-shaped pillar tradition seen at Göbekli Tepe is unique to the Urfa region, but is found at the majority of PPN sites there.{{sfn|Güler|Çelik|Güler|2012}} These include Nevalı Çori, [[Hamzan Tepe]],{{sfn|Çelik|2010}} [[Karahan Tepe]],{{sfn|Çelik|2011}} [[Harbetsuvan Tepesi]],{{sfn|Çelik|2016}} [[Sefer Tepe]],{{sfn|Güler|Çelik|Güler|2012}} and [[Taslı Tepe]].{{sfn|Güler|Çelik|Güler|2013}} Other stone [[stelae]]—without the characteristic T shape—have been documented at contemporary sites further afield, including Çayönü, [[Qermez Dere]], and [[Gusir Höyük]].{{sfn|Dietrich|2016a}}
{{Location map+ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
|relief=1
|width=300
|float=right
|caption=Known PPN sites in the Urfa region.{{sfn|Moetz|Çelik|2012}}{{sfn|Güler|Çelik|Güler|2013}}{{sfn|Çelik|2016}} Sites with T-shaped pillars are marked with [[File:Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg|13px]].
|places=
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = Göbekli Tepe
      | position = top
      | background = white  
      | label_width = 150
      | lat_deg = 37.22
      | lon_deg = 38.92
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = [[Karahan Tepe]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
      | label_width = 8
      | position = top
      | lat_deg = 37.09
      | lon_deg = 39.30 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Hamzan Tepe]]-->
      | position = left
      | lat_deg = 37.08
      | lon_deg = 38.80 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Urfa Yeni Yol]]-->
      | position = left
      | lat_deg = 37.16
      | lon_deg = 38.79 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = [[Nevalı Çori]]
      | lat_deg = 37.52
      | lon_deg = 38.61 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Sefer Tepe]]-->
      | lat_deg = 37.19
      | lon_deg = 39.49 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
<!-- Unknown coordinates, may or may not be considered a T-shaped pillar site
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = [[Kilisik]]
      | lat_deg = 
      | lon_deg = 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 12
  }}
-->
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Herzo Tepe]]-->
      | lat_deg = 37.15
      | lon_deg = 39.50 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F4.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Başaran Höyük]]-->
      | position = bottom
      | lat_deg = 37.13
      | lon_deg = 39.49 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F4.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Kocanizam Tepe]]-->
      | position = left
      | label_width = 8
      | lat_deg = 37.21
      | lon_deg = 39.48 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Taşlı Tepe]]-->
      | position = top
      | lat_deg = 37.37
      | lon_deg = 39.28 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[İnanlı Tepe]]-->
      | position = left
      | lat_deg = 37.26
      | lon_deg = 39.41 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F4.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
  {{Location map~ | Turkey Şanlıurfa
      | label = <!--[[Harbetsuvan Tepesi]]-->
      | position = left
      | lat_deg = 37.05
      | lon_deg = 39.25 
      | mark = Emojione BW 1F1F9.svg
      | marksize = 13
  }}
}}

==Chronology==
[[Radiocarbon dating]] shows that the earliest exposed structures at Göbekli Tepe were built between 9500 and {{BCE|9000}}, towards the end of the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic A]] (PPNA) period.{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2013}}{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|pp=32–33}} The site was significantly expanded in the early {{BCE|9th millennium}} and remained in use until around {{BCE|8000}}, or perhaps slightly later (the early [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]], PPNB).{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|pp=32–33}} There is evidence that smaller groups returned to live amongst the ruins after the Neolithic structures were abandoned.{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|pp=32–33}}

Schmidt originally dated the site to the PPN based on the [[typology (archaeology)|types of stone tools]] found there, considering a PPNA date "most probable".{{sfn|Schmidt|2000b|p=51}} Establishing its [[absolute dating|absolute chronology]] took longer due to methodological challenges.{{sfn|Dietrich|2011}}{{sfn|Dietrich|2016b}} Though the first two radiocarbon dates were published in 1998,{{sfn|Kromer|Schmidt|1998}} these and other samples from the {{archaeogloss|fill}} of the structure dated to the late 10th and early 9th millennium – 500 to 1000 years later than expected for a PPNA site.{{sfn|Dietrich|2011}} Schmidt's team explained the discrepancy in light of their theory that this material was brought to the site from elsewhere when it was abandoned, and so was not representative of the actual use of the structures.{{sfn|Dietrich|2011}}{{sfn|Dietrich|2016b}} They instead turned to a novel method of dating organic material preserved in the [[plaster]] on the structure's walls, which resulted in dates more consistent with a PPNA occupation, in the middle or even early {{BCE|10th millennium}}.{{sfn|Pustovoytov|2002}}{{sfn|Dietrich|Schmidt|2010}}{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2013}} Subsequent research led to a significant revision of Schmidt's chronology, including the abandonment of the hypothesis that the fill of the structures was brought from elsewhere, and a recognition that direct dates on plaster are affected by the [[old wood effect]].{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=38}} Together with new radiocarbon dates, this has established the site's absolute chronology as falling in the period 9500 to {{BCE|8000}} – the late PPNA and PPNB.{{sfn|Clare|2020}}{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020}}

=== Building phases ===
The preliminary, now abandoned,{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32}} stratigraphic model by Klaus Schmidt consisted of three architectural layers. The large circular enclosures were attributed to Layer III, dated to the {{BCE|10th millennium}} (PPNA). The smaller rectangular structures and the abandonment of the site were assigned to Layer II in the {{BCE|9th millennium}} (early to middle PPNB). Layer I consisted of all post-Neolithic activities up to the modern surface.{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2013}}

The revised chronology consists of eight phases that span at least 1,500 years. It details the history of the large circular enclosures, including events that led to their alteration or abandonment, and the evolution of the domestic buildings surrounding them.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32-33}}
* '''Phase 1''': The earliest settlement phase dates to the second half of the {{BCE|10th millennium}} and includes the first versions of enclosures A to D and round-oval domestic structures, which indicate a (semi) sedentary lifestyle.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32}}
* '''Phase 2:''' In the second phase (early {{BCE|9th millennium}}) significant modifications of enclosures A-D were undertaken: New walls were erected, which incorporated the first monolithic T-shaped pillars. An increasing number of domestic structures were built, still mostly oval-round, though with a rising tendency for a rectangular floor plan.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32}}
* '''Phases 3–5:''' In the early PPNB, the northern and western slopes saw the erection of rectangular (domestic) structures. They underwent multiple construction phases, for instance, the addition of benches with incorporated T-shaped pillar, and new inner walls resulting in more rectangular rooms. The large enclosures were modified as well. Walls were repaired and new ones added. Benches were placed against the interior sides of phase 2 walls.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32-33}}<br> At the end of the early PPNB, a slope slide inundated the lower lying structures, flushing sediments and domestic rubble (likely including midden and burials) downhill. This caused extensive damage to enclosure D, and led to stabilization works in Phase 5. Building C was reconstructed for the last time, and a terrace wall was placed above it, to prevent future slope-slides. Nonetheless, a second major slope-slide event occurred, which likely resulted in enclosure D being abandoned in the late {{BCE|9th millennium}}.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32-33}}
* '''Phases 6 and 7:''' Building activity gradually declined in phases 6 and 7 (late 9th to early {{BCE|8th millennium}}). The loss of enclosures B and D may have led to the construction of building G and the "Lion Pillar Building". In Phase 7 another terrace wall was constructed in a last attempt to stabilize the northern slope.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=33}}
* '''Phase 8:''' In the final occupation period, small habitation structures were built within the remains of the abandoned Neolithic village.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=33}}

==Architecture==
[[File:The archaeological site of Göbekli Tepe - main excavation area.png|thumb|upright=1.2|Aerial view of the main excavation area, showing circular enclosures A, B, C and D and a number of rectangular structures.]]

===Large enclosures===
The first circular compounds appear around the latter half of the {{BCE|10th millennium}}. They range from {{cvt|10|to|30|m}} in diameter. Their most notable feature is the presence of T-shaped [[limestone]] pillars evenly set within thick interior walls composed of unworked stone. Four such circular structures have been unearthed so far. Geophysical surveys indicate that there are 16 more, enclosing up to eight pillars each, amounting to nearly 200 pillars in all. The slabs were transported from bedrock pits located approximately {{cvt|100|m}} from the hilltop, with workers using flint points to cut through the limestone bedrock.{{sfn|Schmidt|2000b|pp=52–3}} The pillars are the oldest known [[megalith]]s in the world.{{sfn|Scham|2008|p=23}}

Two taller pillars stand facing one another at the centre of each circle. Whether the circles were provided with a roof is uncertain. Stone benches designed for sitting are found in the interior.{{sfn|Mithen|2004|p=65}} Many of the pillars are decorated with [[Abstract art|abstract]], enigmatic [[pictogram]]s and carved animal reliefs. The pictograms may represent commonly understood sacred symbols, as known from [[Neolithic]] [[cave paintings]] elsewhere. The reliefs depict mammals such as lions, bulls, boars, foxes, gazelle, and donkeys; snakes and other reptiles; [[arthropod]]s such as insects and arachnids; and birds, particularly vultures. Vultures also feature prominently in the iconography of [[Çatalhöyük]] and [[Jericho]].

Few humanoid figures have appeared in the art at Göbekli Tepe. Some of the T-shaped pillars have human arms carved on their lower half, however, suggesting to site excavator Schmidt that they are intended to represent the bodies of stylized humans (or perhaps deities). Loincloths appear on the lower half of a few pillars. The horizontal stone slab on top is thought by Schmidt to symbolize shoulders, which suggests that the figures were left headless.{{sfn|Schmidt|2010|pp=244, 246}} Whether they were intended to serve as surrogate worshippers, symbolize venerated ancestors, or represent supernatural, anthropomorphic beings is not known.{{citation needed|date=May 2024}}

Some of the floors in this, the oldest, layer are made of [[terrazzo]] (burnt lime); others are bedrock from which pedestals to hold the large pair of central pillars were carved in high relief.{{sfn|Schmidt|2010|p=251}} Radiocarbon dating places the construction of these early circles {{circa|{{BCE|9000}}}}.

Later enclosures were rectangular in shape, perhaps to make more efficient use of space compared with circular structures. They often are associated with the emergence of the Neolithic,{{sfn|Flannery|Marcus|2012|p=128}} but the T-shaped pillars, the main feature of the older enclosures, also are present here, indicating that the buildings continued to serve the same function in the culture,{{sfn|Schmidt|2010|pp=239, 241}} during the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]] (PPNB). The several adjoining rectangular, doorless, and windowless rooms have floors of polished lime reminiscent of [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] terrazzo floors. Carbon dating has yielded dates between 8800 and {{BCE|8000}}.{{sfn|Schmidt|2009|p=291}} Several T-pillars up to 1.5 meters tall occupy the center of the rooms. A pair decorated with fierce-looking lions is the rationale for the name "lion pillar building" by which their enclosure is known.{{sfn|Schmidt|2009|p=198}}

<gallery mode="packed" heights="180">
Urfa_Göbeklitepe_Building_B_5326.jpg|Enclosure B
File:Göbeklitepe_Şanlıurfa.jpg|Enclosure C
File:Göbeklitepe.jpg|Enclosure F
</gallery>

=== Slope slide events ===
The enclosures, lying over {{Convert|10|m|ft}} below the highest areas of the settlement, were subject to several slope slide events during the occupation period of Göbekli Tepe.{{Sfn|Schönicke|2019|p=217-219}} A particularly severe one occurred at the end of the early PPNB. which inundated enclosure D with rubble of domestic structures and sediments, including burials and [[midden]] deposits. This caused severe damage to the enclosure, which led to repairs and stabilization works to be conducted. At a later point, in Building Phase 5, terrace walls were erected, likely to prevent future damage from such events. These measures, however, proved futile, when a second major slope slide probably caused the enclosure to the abandoned during Building Phase 6, around the late 9th millennium BCE. Other enclosure suffered a similar fate, which might have led to new enclosures being constructed to replace them.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32-33}}

Previously, it had been assumed that the large enclosures were intentionally back-filled, an interpretation that has fallen out of favor since Klaus Schmidt's death.{{Sfn|Schönicke|2019|p=217}}

===Domestic structures===
In the earliest occupation phase, round-oval domestic structures were built alongside the large enclosures, which indicate a (semi) sedentary lifestyle. Over time there was an increasing tendency of these buildings to have a rectangular floor plan. In the final settlement phase only small structures were erected.{{Sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=32-33}}

=== Burials ===
Before any burials were found, Schmidt speculated that graves could have been located in niches behind the walls of the circular building.<ref name="Smithsonian2008">{{harvnb|Curry|2008b|}}.</ref> In 2017, fragments of human crania with incisions were discovered at the site, interpreted as a manifestation of the widespread [[Neolithic skull cult]].{{sfn|Gresky|Haelm|Clare|2017}} Special preparation of human crania in the form of [[plastered human skulls]] is known from the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic]] period at Levantine sites such as [[Tell es-Sultan]] (also known as [[Jericho]]), [[Tell Aswad]], and [[Yiftahel]], and later in Anatolia at [[Çatalhöyük]].{{sfn|Stordeur|2003}}{{sfn|Kenyon|1965}}{{sfn|Meskell|2008}}

===Other structures===
At the western edge of the hill, a lionlike figure was found. In this area, [[flint]] and limestone fragments occur more frequently. It was, therefore, suggested that this could have been some kind of sculpture workshop.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|pp=109–11}} It is unclear, on the other hand, how to classify three [[phallus|phallic]] depictions from the surface of the southern plateau. They are near the quarries of classical times, making their dating difficult.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|p=111}}

Apart from the tell, there is an incised platform with two sockets that could have held pillars and a surrounding flat bench. This platform corresponds to the oldest parts of the tell. Continuing the naming pattern, it is called "complex&nbsp;E". Owing to its similarity to the cult-buildings at [[Nevalı Çori]] it has also been called "Temple of the Rock". Its floor has been carefully hewn out of the bedrock and smoothed, reminiscent of the [[terrazzo]] floors of the younger complexes at Göbekli Tepe. Immediately northwest of this area are two cistern-like pits that are believed to be part of complex&nbsp;E. One of these pits has a table-high pin as well as a staircase with five steps.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|p=109}}

===Later structures===
The uppermost layer of the tell is the shallowest but accounts for the longest stretch of time. It consists of loose sediments caused by erosion and the virtually-uninterrupted use of the hill for agricultural purposes since it ceased to operate as a ceremonial center.

Around the beginning of the {{BCE|8th millennium}}, Göbekli Tepe lost its importance. The advent of [[history of agriculture|agriculture]] and [[animal husbandry]] brought new realities to human life in the area, and the "Stone-age zoo" apparently lost whatever significance it had had for the region's older, foraging communities.

== Construction ==
The plateau Göbekli Tepe is situated on has been shaped by erosion and [[quarry]]ing from the Neolithic onwards. There are four {{convert|10|m|ft|adj=mid|-long}} and {{convert|20|cm|in|adj=mid|-wide}} channels on the southern part of the plateau, interpreted as the remains of an ancient quarry from which rectangular blocks were taken. These are possibly related to a square building in the neighbourhood, of which only the foundation is preserved. Presumably, this is the remains of a Roman [[watchtower]] that was part of the ''[[Limes Arabicus]]'', though this is conjecture.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|p=105}} Most structures on the plateau seem to be the result of Neolithic quarrying, with the quarries being used as sources for the huge, monolithic architectural elements. Their profiles were pecked into the rock, with the detached blocks then levered out of the rock bank.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|p=105}} Several quarries where round workpieces had been produced were identified. Their status as quarries was confirmed by the find of a 3-by-3&nbsp;metre piece at the southeastern slope of the plateau. Unequivocally Neolithic are three T-shaped pillars that had not yet been levered out of the bedrock. The largest of them lies on the northern plateau. It has a length of {{convert|7|m|0|abbr=on}} and its head has a width of {{convert|3|m|0|abbr=on}}. Its weight may be around 50&nbsp;tons. The two other unfinished pillars lie on the southern Plateau.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}}

Archaeologists disagree on how much labour was needed to construct the site. Schmidt maintained that "the work of quarrying, transporting, and erecting tons of heavy, monolithic, and almost universally well-prepared limestone pillars [...] was not within the capability of a few people".{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|p=252}} Using [[Thor Heyerdahl]]'s experiments with the [[moai]] of [[Rapa Nui]] as a reference, he estimated that moving the pillars alone must have involved hundreds of people.{{sfn|Banning|2011}} According to these experiments, one ''moai'' of similar size to a T-shaped pillar from Göbekli Tepe would have taken 20 people a year to carve, and 50–75 people a week to transport 15&nbsp;km.{{sfn|Dietrich|Notroff|2015}} Schmidt's team has also cited a 1917 account of the construction of a megalith on the Indonesian island of [[Nias]], which took 525 people three days.{{sfn|Banning|2011}}{{sfn|Dietrich|Notroff|2015}} These estimates underpin their interpretation that the site was built by a large, non-resident workforce,{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=35}} coerced or enticed there by a small religious elite.{{sfn|Schmidt|1999}}{{sfn|Dietrich|Notroff|Schmidt|2017}} However, others estimate that just 7–14 people could have moved the pillars using ropes and water or another lubricant, with techniques used to construct other monuments such as [[Stonehenge]].{{sfn|Banning|2011}} Experiments at Göbekli Tepe itself have suggested that all the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B|PPNB]] structures currently exposed could have been built by 12–24 people in less than four months, allowing for time spent quarrying stone and gathering, and preparing food.{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|p=37}} These labour estimates are thought to be within the capability of a single extended family or village community in the Neolithic.{{sfn|Banning|2011}} They also match the number of people that could have comfortably been inside one of the buildings at the same time.{{sfn|Kinzel|Clare|2020|pp=38–44}} 

Enclosures B, C and D were initially planned as a single, hierarchical complex that forms an [[equilateral triangle]], according to Haklay and Gopher.{{sfn|Haklay|Gopher|2020}}

== Tools ==
Göbekli Tepe is littered with [[flint]] artifacts, from the ridge-top site to the slopes.{{Sfn|Benedict|1980|p=179}} The tool assemblage found resembles that of other Northern Levantine Pre-Pottery Neolithic (settlement) sites.{{Sfn|Breuers|Kinzel|2022|p=484}}

In 1963, over 3,000 Neolithic tools were uncovered, the vast majority of excellent quality flint, only a handful of [[obsidian]]. [[Lithic core|Cores]], various blades, [[Flake tool|flakes]], [[Scraper (archaeology)|scrapers]], [[Burin (lithic flake)|burins]], and [[projectile point]]s, were the most common tool types.{{Sfn|Benedict|1980|p=181-182}}

Excavations of Space 16, a small building adjacent to enclosure D, yielded almost 700 tools. Most common were [[Retouch (lithics)|retouched]] artifacts, followed by scrapers, perforators and artifacts with [[Sickle-gloss|gloss]]. Heavy duty tools, burins and [[microlith]]s were also present.{{Sfn|Breuers|Kinzel|2022|p=478-479}}

Over 7000 [[Millstone|grinding stones]] have been found, spanning the entirety of the sites usage, which are suggested to have been used to process [[cereal]] based on [[phytolith]]s found in associated soil, though it is unclear whether the cereal was wild or cultivated.{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2019}}

== Iconography ==
===Pillars===
[[File:Şanlıurfa Müzesi Göbeklitepe D Tapınağı.jpg|thumb|upright|Reproduction of the central pillars of Enclosure&nbsp;D in the Şanlıurfa museum: engraved arms are visible on the shaft.]]

The stone pillars in the enclosures at Göbekli Tepe are T-shaped, similar to other Pre-Pottery Neolithic sites in the region.{{sfn|Schmidt|2015|pp=285–292}} Unlike at these other sites, however, many of the pillars are carved – typically in low [[relief]], though sometimes in high relief. Most carvings depict animals, mostly serpents, foxes, and boars, but also gazelle, [[mouflon]] (wild sheep), [[onager]], ducks, and vultures. Insofar as they can be identified, the animals are male, and often depicted with an aggressive posture.{{sfn|Schmidt|2012|p=152}}{{sfn|Peters|Schmidt|2004|pp=183–185, 206}}

Abstract shapes are also depicted, mostly an upright or horizontal H-shaped symbol, but also crescents and disks. Depictions of humans are rare; pillar&nbsp;43 in enclosure&nbsp;D includes a headless man with an [[ithyphallic|erect phallus]]. However, the 'T'-shape of the pillars themselves is [[anthropomorphic]]: the shaft is the body, and the top is the head. This is confirmed by the fact that some pillars include – in addition to animal reliefs – carvings of arms, hands, and [[loincloth]]s.{{sfn|Schmidt|2012|p=153–155}}

The two central pillars occupied a special place in the symbolic architecture of the enclosures. Those in Enclosure&nbsp;D represent humans, with arms, a belt, and a piece of cloth that hides the genitals. The sex of the individuals depicted cannot be clearly identified, though Schmidt suggested that they are two men because the belts they wear are a male attribute in the period. There is only one certain representation of a woman, depicted naked on a slab.{{sfn|Schmidt|2012|p=153–155}}

Schmidt and zooarchaeologist [[Joris Peters]] have argued that the variety of fauna depicted on the pillars means they likely do not express a single iconography. They suggest that, since many of the animals pictured are predators, the stones may have been intended to [[Apotropaic magic|stave off evils]] through some form of magic representation, or served as [[totem]]s.{{sfn|Peters|Schmidt|2004|pp=209–12}}

<gallery mode="packed" heights="180">
File:Göbekli Tepe Pillar.JPG|Pillar&nbsp;10, Enclosure&nbsp;B: fox
File:Göbeklitepe Building C 5372 (cropped).jpg|Pillar&nbsp;12, Enclosure&nbsp;C: ducks and boar
File:Göbeklitepe Building C sept 2019 5373crop.jpg|Pillar&nbsp;27, Enclosure&nbsp;C: predator (perhaps a [[felid]]) hunting a boar
File:Göbekli2012-11.jpg|Pillar&nbsp;37 (central), Enclosure&nbsp;C: fox
File:Vulture Stone, Gobekli Tepe, Sanliurfa, South-east Anatolia, Turkey (cropped).jpg|Pillar&nbsp;43, Enclosure&nbsp;D: the "Vulture Stone"
</gallery>

===Other objects===
The structures at Göbekli Tepe have also yielded a number of smaller carved stones, which typically cannot be attributed to one period or another. The iconography of these objects is similar to that of the pillars, mostly depicting animals, but also humans, again primarily male.{{sfn|Schmidt|2011|pp=929–930}}{{sfn|Dietrich et al.|2019|p=26}}

<gallery mode="packed" heights="140">
File:Urfa museum Animal relief sept 2019 4772.jpg|Carved stone with animal (possibly a reptile, felid, or wolverine) in high relief
File:Urfa museum Boar statue sept 2019 4766.jpg|Boar statuette with legs
File:Urfa_museum_Totem_sept_2019_4806.jpg|Sculptured stone pole
File:Göbekli2012-27.jpg|Boar statuette without legs
File:Urfa museum Animal statuette sept 2019 4754.jpg|Head of an animal
</gallery>

A "totem pole" was discovered in one of the structures, dating to the early PPNB. Reassembled, it is {{Convert|192|cm|ft}} tall and {{Convert|30|cm|ft}} in diameter. It depicts three figures (from top to bottom): a predator (a bear or large felid) with a missing head, and the neck and arms of a human; another figure missing a head with human arms, likely male; and a third figure with a head that had survived intact. Snakes are carved on either side.{{sfn|Köksal-Schmidt|Schmidt|2010}}

==Interpretation==
{{Update|section|date=November 2022}}
Klaus Schmidt's view was that Göbekli Tepe was a stone-age mountain sanctuary.{{Citation needed|date=November 2022}} He suggested it was a central location for a [[Veneration of the dead|cult of the dead]] and that the carved animals are there to protect the dead.{{Citation needed|date=November 2022}} Butchered bones found in large numbers from the local game such as deer, gazelle, pigs, and geese have been identified as refuse from food hunted and cooked or otherwise prepared for the congregants.{{sfn|Peters|Schmidt|2004|p=207}} Zooarchaeological analysis shows that gazelle were only seasonally present in the region, suggesting that events such as rituals and feasts were likely timed to occur during periods when game availability was at its peak.{{sfn|Lang et al.|2013}} Schmidt saw the construction of Göbekli Tepe as contributing to the later development of urban civilization.{{sfn|Schmidt|2000|}}[[File:UrfaMuseumGöbekli.jpg|thumb|Steles and sculptures from Göbekli Tepe in [[Şanlıurfa Museum]] ]]

Schmidt also speculated on the belief systems of the groups that created Göbekli Tepe, based on comparisons with other shrines and settlements. He presumed [[shamanism|shamanic]] practices and suggested that the T-shaped pillars represent human forms, perhaps ancestors, whereas he saw a fully articulated belief in deities as not developing until later, in [[Mesopotamia]], that was associated with extensive temples and palaces. This corresponds well with an ancient [[Sumer]]ian belief that agriculture, [[animal husbandry]], and weaving were brought to humans from the sacred mountain [[Ekur]], which was inhabited by [[Annuna]] deities, very ancient deities without individual names. Schmidt identified this story as a primeval oriental myth that preserves a partial memory of the emerging Neolithic.{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|pp=216–21}} It is apparent that the animal and other images give no indication of organized violence, i.e. there are no depictions of hunting raids or wounded animals, and the pillar carvings generally ignore game on which the society depended, such as deer, in favour of formidable creatures such as lions, snakes, spiders, and scorpions.<ref name="Smithsonian2008" />{{sfn|Schmidt|2006|pp=193–4, 218}}{{sfn|Peters|Schmidt|2004|p=209}} Expanding on Schmidt's interpretation that round enclosures could represent sanctuaries, Gheorghiu's semiotic interpretation reads the Göbekli Tepe iconography as a cosmogonic map that would have related the local community to the surrounding landscape and the cosmos.{{sfn|Gheorghiu|2015}}

The assumption that the site was strictly cultic in purpose and not inhabited has been challenged as well by the suggestion that the structures served as large communal houses, "similar in some ways to the large plank houses of the Northwest Coast of North America with their impressive house posts and [[totem pole]]s."{{sfn|Banning|2011|}} It is not known why every few decades the existing pillars were buried to be replaced by new stones as part of a smaller, concentric ring inside the older one.{{sfn|Mann|2011|p=48}} According to Rémi Hadad, in recent years "the interpretative enthusiasm that sought to see Göbekli Tepe as a regional ceremonial centre where nomadic populations would periodically converge is giving way to a vision that is more in line with what is known about other large Pre-Pottery Neolithic sites, where ritual and profane functions coexist."{{sfn|Hadad|2022}} For example, the discovery of domestic buildings and rainwater harvesting systems has forced a revision of the 'temple' narrative.{{sfn|Clare|2020}}

==Research history==
[[File:Klaus Schmidt Monumento 2014 5.jpg|thumb|right|Klaus Schmidt delivering a lecture in Salzburg, 2014.]]
Before being documented by archaeologists, the hill Göbekli Tepe stands on, known locally in [[Kurdish language|Kurdish]] as {{lang|ku|Girê Mirazan}} or {{lang|ku|Xerabreşkê}} ({{lang|ku|Girê Mirazan}} meaning 'Wish Hill'{{sfn|Kosen|2019}}), was considered a sacred place.{{sfn|Zekîoğlu|2020}}{{sfn|''Hürriyet Daily News''|2018}}

The archaeological site was first noted in a [[Survey (archaeology)|survey]] conducted by [[Istanbul University]] and the [[University of Chicago]] in 1963.{{sfn|Benedict|1980}} American archaeologist Peter Benedict identified the [[stone tool]]s collected from the surface of site as characteristic of the [[Aceramic Neolithic]],{{sfn|Schmidt|2011|p=917}} but apparently mistook the upper parts of the T-shaped pillars for grave markers.{{sfn|Batuman|2011}} The hill had long been under agricultural cultivation, and generations of local inhabitants had frequently moved rocks and placed them in clearance piles, which may have disturbed the upper layers of the site. At some point, attempts had been made to break up some of the pillars, presumably by farmers who mistook them for ordinary large rocks.<ref name="Smithsonian2008" />

In October 1994, German archaeologist [[Klaus Schmidt (archaeologist)|Klaus Schmidt]], who had previously been working at [[Nevalı Çori]], was looking for evidence of similar sites in the area and decided to re-examine the location described by the Chicago researchers in 1963.<ref name="Smithsonian2008" />{{sfn|Dietrich|Dietrich|Notroff|2017}} Asking in nearby villages about hills with flint,{{sfn|Dietrich|Dietrich|Notroff|2017}} he was guided to Göbekli Tepe by Mahmut Yıldız, whose family owned the land the site was situated on.{{sfn|''Hürriyet Daily News''|2018}} The Yıldız family had previously discovered finds while ploughing there, which they reported to the local museum.{{sfn|''Hürriyet Daily News''|2018}}{{sfn|''Hürriyet Daily News''|2021}} Having found similar structures at Nevalı Çori, Schmidt recognized the possibility that the stone slabs were not grave markers as supposed by Benedict, but the tops of prehistoric [[megalith]]s. He began excavations the following year and soon unearthed the first of the huge T-shaped pillars.<ref name="Smithsonian2008" /> Ultimately he found only three tombs on the eastmost hill-group, which were a pilgrimage destination.{{sfn|Beile-Bohn|Gerber|Morsch|Schmidt|1998|p=45}} Yıldız went on to work on the excavations and serve as the site's guard.{{sfn|''Hürriyet Daily News''|2018}}

Schmidt continued to direct excavations at the site on behalf of the [[Şanlıurfa Museum]] and the [[German Archaeological Institute]] (DAI) until his death in 2014. Since then, the DAI's research at the site has been coordinated by [[Lee Clare]].{{sfn|Clare et al.|2017|p=87}}{{sfn|Clare|2020}} {{As of|2021}}, work on the site is conducted jointly by Istanbul University, the Şanlıurfa Museum, and the DAI, under the overall direction of [[Necmi Karul]].{{sfn|''Tepe Telegrams''}}{{sfn|Kazanci|2020}} Recent excavations have been more limited than Schmidt's, focusing on detailed documentation and conservation of the areas already exposed.{{sfn|Kazanci|2020}}

==Conservation==
[[File:Göbeklitepe Ören Yeri 2023.jpg|thumb|upright=1|Protective roof added to the site]]

Göbekli Tepe was designated a [[List of World Heritage Sites in Turkey|UNESCO World Heritage Site]] in 2018, recognising its outstanding universal value as "one of the first manifestations of human-made monumental architecture".{{sfn|''UNESCO World Heritage Centre''}} {{As of|2021}}, less than 5% of the site had been excavated.{{sfn|Strebe|2015}}

Conservation work at the site caused controversy in 2018, when Çiğdem Köksal Schmidt, an archaeologist, and widow of Klaus Schmidt, said that damage was caused by the use of concrete and "heavy equipment" during the construction of a new walkway. The [[Ministry of Culture and Tourism (Turkey)|Ministry of Culture and Tourism]] responded that no concrete was used and that no damage had occurred.{{sfn|Erbil|2018}}

==See also==
* [[Boncuklu Tarla]]
* {{annotated link|Gürcütepe}}
* [[List of largest monoliths]]
* {{annotated link|Prehistoric religion}}

==Notes==
{{reflist}}

==References==
{{refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Arbuckle |first=Benjamin S. |year=2014 |title=Pace and process in the emergence of animal husbandry in Neolithic Southwest Asia |url=http://anthropology.uw.edu.pl/08/bne-08-03.pdf |journal=Bioarchaeology of the Near East |volume=8 |pages=53–81 }}
* {{cite book|editor=Badisches Landesmuseum Karlsruhe|chapter=Vor 12.000 Jahren in Anatolien. Die ältesten Monumente der Menschheit.|title=Begleitbuch zur Ausstellung im Badischen Landesmuseum|date=20 January – 17 June 2007|location=Stuttgart|publisher=Theiss|isbn=978-3-8062-2072-8}}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |year=2002 |title=Aceramic Neolithic |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Prehistory, Volume 8: South and Southwest Asia |publisher=Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers |last=Banning |first=Edward B. |editor-last=Peregrine |editor-first=Peter N. |pages=1–20 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4615-0023-0_1 |isbn=978-1-4684-7135-9 |authorlink=Edward B. Banning |editor-last2=Ember |editor-first2=Melvin}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Banning |first=Edward B. |date=2011 |title=So Fair a House: Göbekli Tepe and the Identification of Temples in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of the Near East |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=52 |issue=5 – October 2011 |pages=619–60 |doi=10.1086/661207 |s2cid=161719608}}
* {{Cite magazine|last=Batuman|first=Elif|date=2011-12-11|title=Turkey's Ancient Sanctuary|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/12/19/the-sanctuary|magazine=The New Yorker|access-date=26 August 2017}}
* {{Cite journal |journal=Istanbuler Mitteilungen |volume=48 |last1=Beile-Bohn |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253342438 |title=Neolithische Forschungen in Obermesopotamien: Gürcütepe und Göbekli Tepe |last2=Gerber |last3=Morsch |last4=Schmidt |year=1998 |pages=5–78 |language=de }}
* {{Cite book |last=Benedict |first=Peter |url=https://oi.uchicago.edu/research/publications/misc/prehistoric-research-southeastern-anatolia-guneydogu-anadolu-tarihoncesi |title=Prehistoric Research in Southeastern Anatolia |year=1980 |editor-last=Cambel |editor-first=Halet |pages=179, 181–182 |chapter=Survey Work in Southeastern Anatolia |editor-last2=Braidwood |editor-first2=Robert J. }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Breuers |first1=Jonas |last2=Kinzel |first2=Moritz |year=2022 |title=Tracking the Neolithic in the Near East. Lithic Perspectives on Its Origins, Development and Dispersals |chapter=“[…] but it is not clear at all where all the […] debris had been taken from […]”: Chipped Stone Artefacts, Architecture and Formation Processes at Göbekli Tepe |pages=469–486 |chapter-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360996154 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Caletti |first=Christopher Claudio |date=2020-11-08 |title=Göbekli Tepe and the Sites around the Urfa Plain (SE Turkey): Recent Discoveries and New Interpretations |url=https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/asiana/article/view/679 |journal=Asia Anteriore Antica. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Cultures |volume=2 |language=en |pages=95–123 |doi=10.13128/ASIANA-679 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Çelik |first=Bahattin |year=2010 |title=Hamzan Tepe in the light of new finds |journal=Documenta Praehistorica |volume=37 |pages=257–268 |doi=10.4312/dp.37.22 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Çelik |first=Bahattin |year=2011 |title=Karahan Tepe: A new cultural centre in the Urfa area in Turkey |journal=Documenta Praehistorica |volume=38 |pages=241–253 |doi=10.4312/dp.38.19 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Çelik |first=Bahattin |year=2016 |title=A small-scale cult centre in southeast Turkey: Harbetsuvan Tepesi |journal=Documenta Praehistorica |volume=43 |pages=421–428 |doi=10.4312/dp.43.21 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite report |url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1572/documents |title=Göbekli Tepe: Nomination for Inclusion on the World Heritage List |last1=Clare |first1=Lee |last2=Pirson |first2=Felix |publisher=[[UNESCO]] |last3=Eichmann |first3=Ricardo |last4=Yüncü |first4=Zeynep Tuna |last5=İnan |first5=Yıldırım |last6=Mert |first6=Duygu |last7=Duzcu |first7=Seda |ref={{harvid|Clare et al.|2017}} |year=2017 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Clare |first=Lee |year=2020 |title=Göbekli Tepe, Turkey. A brief summary of research at a new World Heritage Site (2015–2019) |journal=E-Forschungsberichte |publisher=[[Deutsches Archäologisches Institut]] |volume=2020 |issue=2 |pages=81–88 |doi=10.34780/efb.v0i2.1012}}
* {{cite journal |last=Curry |first=Andrew |url=http://80.251.40.59/veterinary.ankara.edu.tr/fidanci/Yasam/Gelecege_Miras/Gobekli-Tepe.pdf |title=Seeking the Roots of Ritual |journal=Science |issue=319 |date=18 January 2008a |pages=278–280 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120415112503/http://80.251.40.59/veterinary.ankara.edu.tr/fidanci/Yasam/Gelecege_Miras/Gobekli-Tepe.pdf |archive-date=15 April 2012 }}
* {{Cite magazine |last=Curry |first=Andrew |year=2008b |title=Göbekli Tepe: The World's First Temple? |url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/gobekli-tepe.html |magazine=[[Smithsonian (magazine)|Smithsonian]] |volume=November 2008 |issn=0037-7333 }}
* {{Cite magazine |last=Curry |first=Andrew |year=2021 |title=Last Stand of the Hunter-Gatherers? |url=https://www.archaeology.org/issues/422-2105/features/9591-turkey-gobekli-tepe-hunter-gatherers |magazine=[[Archaeology (magazine)|Archaeology]] |volume=May/June 2021 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Dietrich |first1=Oliver |last2=Schmidt |first2=Klaus |year=2010 |title=A Radiocarbon Date from the Wall Plaster of Enclosure D of Göbekli Tepe |url=https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_2010_2.pdf |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=2010 |issue=2 |page=8 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Dietrich |first=Oliver |year=2011 |title=Radiocarbon dating the first temples of mankind. Comments on 14C-Dates from Göbekli Tepe |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258182967 |journal=Zeitschrift für Orient-Archäologie |volume=4 |pages=12–25 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Dietrich |first1=Oliver |last2=Köksal-Schmidt |first2=Çiğdem |last3=Notroff |first3=Jens |last4=Schmidt |first4=Klaus |year=2013 |title=Establishing a Radiocarbon Sequence for Göbekli Tepe: State of Research and New Data |url=https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_2013_1.pdf |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=2013 |issue=1 |pages=35–37 |ref={{harvid|Dietrich et al.|2013}} }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Dietrich |first1=Laura |last2=Meister |first2=Julia |last3=Dietrich |first3=Oliver |last4=Notroff |first4=Jens |last5=Kiep |first5=Janika |last6=Heeb |first6=Julia |last7=Beuger |first7=André |last8=Schütt |first8=Brigitta |year=2019 |title=Cereal processing at Early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, southeastern Turkey |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=14 |issue=5 |pages=e0215214 |bibcode=2019PLoSO..1415214D |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0215214 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=6493732 |pmid=31042741 |ref={{harvid|Dietrich et al.|2019}}
|doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Dietrich |first1=Oliver |title=Defining the Sacred: Approaches to the Archaeology of Religion in the Near East |last2=Notroff |first2=Jens |date=2015 |publisher=Oxbow Books |isbn=978-1-78297-685-1 |editor-last=Laneri |editor-first=Nicola |page=75 |chapter=A sanctuary, or so fair a house? In defense of an archaeology of cult at Pre-Pottery Neolithic Gobekli Tepe |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M98dCgAAQBAJ&q=G%C3%B6bekli%20Tepe%20earliest&pg=PA75 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Dietrich |first1=Oliver |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-48402-0_5 |title=Feast, Famine or Fighting? Multiple Pathways to Social Complexity |last2=Notroff |first2=Jens |last3=Schmidt |first3=Klaus |date=2017 |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-48402-0 |pages=91–132 |language=en |chapter=Feasting, Social Complexity, and the Emergence of the Early Neolithic of Upper Mesopotamia: A View from Göbekli Tepe |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-48402-0_5 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Dietrich |first=Oliver |date=8 May 2016a |title=The current distribution of sites with T-shaped pillars |url=https://www.dainst.blog/the-tepe-telegrams/2016/05/08/the-current-distribution-of-sites-with-t-shaped-pillars/ |website=Tepe Telegrams |accessdate=17 May 2021 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Dietrich |first=Oliver |date=22 June 2016b |title=How old is it? Dating Göbekli Tepe. |work=Tepe Telegrams |url=https://www.dainst.blog/the-tepe-telegrams/2016/06/22/how-old-ist-it-dating-gobekli-tepe/ }}
* {{Cite magazine |last1=Dietrich |first1=Oliver |last2=Dietrich |first2=Laura |last3=Notroff |first3=Jens |year=2017 |title=Cult as a Driving Force of Human History: A View from Göbekli Tepe |url=https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/cult-as-a-driving-force-of-human-history/ |magazine=Expedition |location=Philadelphia, PA |publisher=[[University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology|Penn Museum]] |volume=59 |issue=3 }}
* {{Cite AV media|editor=DVD-ROM: MediaCultura|title=Vor 12.000 Jahren in Anatolien. Die ältesten Monumente der Menschheit.|location=Stuttgart|publisher=Theiss|year=2007|isbn=978-3-8062-2090-2}}
* {{Cite web |last=Erbil |first=Ömer |date=21 March 2018 |title=Construction around site of Göbeklitepe stirs debate |url=http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/construction-around-site-of-gobeklitepe-stirs-debate-129089 |access-date=24 January 2021 |website=Hürriyet Daily News }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Flannery |first1=Kent |title=The Creation of Inequality |last2=Marcus |first2=Joyce |date=2012 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-06469-0 |location=Cambridge MA |authorlink1=Kent Flannery |authorlink2=Joyce Marcus}}
* {{Cite web |title=Göbekli Tepe |url=http://www.forvo.com/word/g%C3%B6bekli_tepe/ |work=Forvo Pronunciation Dictionary |ref={{harvid|Forvo Pronunciation Dictionary}} }}
* {{cite book|last=Gheorghiu|first=Dragos|year=2015|chapter=A river runs through it. The semiotics of Gobekli Tepe's map (an exercise of archaeological imagination)|editor-last=Vianello|editor-first=Andrea|title=Rivers in Prehistory|location=Oxford|publisher=Archaeopress}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Fuller |first1=Dorian Q. |last2=Willcox |first2=George |last3=Allaby |first3=Robin G. |year=2012 |title=Early agricultural pathways: moving outside the 'core area' hypothesis in Southwest Asia |url=https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/63/2/617/501600?login=true |journal=Journal of Experimental Botany |volume=63 |issue=2 |pages=617–633 |doi=10.1093/jxb/err307 |issn=0022-0957 |pmid=22058404 |doi-access=free |authorlink1=Dorian Fuller |authorlink2=George Willcox }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Gresky |first1=Julia |last2=Haelm |first2=Juliane |last3=Clare |first3=Lee |date=28 June 2017 |title=Modified human crania from Göbekli Tepe provide evidence for a new form of Neolithic skull cult |journal=Science Advances |language=en |volume=3 |issue=6 |pages=e1700564 |bibcode=2017SciA....3E0564G |doi=10.1126/sciadv.1700564 |issn=2375-2548 |pmc=5489262 |pmid=28782013 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Güler |first1=Gül |last2=Çelik |first2=Bahattin |last3=Güler |first3=Mustafa |year=2013 |title=New Pre-Pottery Neolithic sites and cult centres in the Urfa Region |journal=Documenta Praehistorica |volume=40 |pages=291–303 |doi=10.4312/dp.40.23 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Güler |first1=Mustafa |last2=Çelik |first2=Bahattin |last3=Güler |first3=Gül |year=2012 |title=New pre-pottery neolithic settlements from Viranşehir District |journal=Anadolu / Anatolia |volume=38 |pages=164–80 |doi=10.1501/Andl_0000000398 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite news |date=27 March 2018 |title=The guard of Göbeklitepe, humanity's 'ground zero' |language=en |work=Hürriyet Daily News |url=https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/the-guard-of-gobeklitepe-humanitys-ground-zero-129322 |access-date=5 April 2021 |ref={{harvid|Hürriyet Daily News|2018}} }}
* {{Cite web |date=2021-03-05 |title=Landowner recalls story of Göbeklitepe's discovery |url=https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/landowner-recalls-story-of-gobeklitepes-discovery-162873 |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=Hürriyet Daily News |language=en |ref={{harvid|Hürriyet Daily News|2021}} }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Lewis-Williams |first1=David |last2=Pearce |first2=David |title=An Accidental revolution? Early Neolithic religion and economic change |url=https://www.academia.edu/19767870 |journal=Minerva |date=January 2006 |volume=17 #4 (July/August, 2006) |pages=29–31 }}
* {{cite book|last1=Linsmeier|first1=Klaus-Dieter|last2=Schmidt|first2=Klaus|chapter=Ein anatolisches Stonehenge|title=Moderne Archäologie|location=Heidelberg|publisher=Spektrum-der-Wissenschaft-Verlag|year=2003|pages=10–15|isbn=3-936278-35-0}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hadad |first1=Rémi |editor1-last=Laporte |editor1-first=Luc |editor2-last=Large |editor2-first=Jean-Marc |editor3-last=Nespoulous |editor3-first=Laurent |editor4-last=Scarre |editor4-first=Chris |editor5-last=Steimer-Herbet |editor5-first=Tara |title=Megaliths of the World |date=2022 |publisher=Archaeopress |location=Oxford |isbn=978-1-80327-321-1 |pages=823–836 |chapter=In the shadow of monoliths: Göbekli Tepe and the monumental tradition of the Pre-Pottery Levant}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Haklay |first1=Gil |last2=Gopher |first2=Avi |year=2020 |title=Geometry and Architectural Planning at Göbekli Tepe, Turkey |journal=Cambridge Archaeological Journal |volume=30 |issue=2 |pages=343–357 |doi=10.1017/S0959774319000660 |issn=0959-7743 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hauptmann |first=Harald |title=The Neolithic in Turkey: the cradle of civilization, new discoveries |publisher=Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları |year=1999 |editor-last=Özdoğan |editor-first=M. |location=Istanbul |pages=65–86 |chapter=The Urfa region |editor-last2=Basgelen |editor-first2=N. |authorlink=Harald Hauptmann}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Herrmann |first1=Richard A. |url=https://www.academia.edu/41312606 |title=Wasserwirtschaftliche Innovationen im archäologischen Kontext: von den prähistorischen Anfängen bis zu den Metropolen der Antike |last2=Schmidt |first2=Klaus |publisher=Leidorf |year=2012 |isbn=978-3-86757-385-6 |editor-last=Klimscha |editor-first=F. |location=Rahden/Westfalen |pages=54–67 |language=de |chapter=Göbekli Tepe–Untersuchungen zur Gewinnung und Nutzung von Wasser im Bereich des steinzeitlichen Bergheiligtums |editor-last2=Eichmann |editor-first2=Ricardo |editor-link2=Ricardo Eichmann |editor-last3=Schuler |editor-first3=C. |editor-last4=Fahlbusch |editor-first4=H. }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Hodder |first=Ian |year=2018 |title=Things and the Slow Neolithic: the Middle Eastern Transformation |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10816-017-9336-0 |journal=Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory |language=en |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=155–177 |doi=10.1007/s10816-017-9336-0 |issn=1573-7764 |authorlink=Ian Hodder |s2cid=151467821 }}
* {{Cite news |last=Kazanci |first=Handan |date=8 March 2020 |title=Turkey: Conservation, not excavation, focus in Gobeklitepe |agency=Anadolu Agency |url=https://www.aa.com.tr/en/culture/turkey-conservation-not-excavation-focus-in-gobeklitepe/1758455 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kenyon |first=Kathleen |title=Excavations at Jericho, II: The Tombs Excavated in 1955-1958 |publisher=British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem |year=1965}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Kinzel |first1=Moritz |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=T6QGEAAAQBAJ |title=Monumentalising Life in the Neolithic: Narratives of Change and Continuity |last2=Clare |first2=Lee |publisher=Oxbow |year=2020 |isbn=978-1-78925-495-2 |editor-last=Gebauer |editor-first=Anne Birgitte |location=Oxford |chapter=Monumental – compared to what? A perspective from Göbekli Tepe |editor-last2=Sørensen |editor-first2=Lasse |editor-last3=Teather |editor-first3=Anne |editor-last4=Valera |editor-first4=António Carlos |pages=29–48 }}
* {{Cite news |last=Kosen |first=Hesen |date=24 July 2019 |title=Girê Mirozan Rihayê dike navenda geshtyariyê |language=ku |work=[[Kurdistan 24]] |url=https://www.kurdistan24.net/ku/magazin/27cf0771-9b3f-44d1-b5fe-4bbc9deeb7bf |access-date=25 November 2020 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Knitter |first1=Daniel |last2=Braun |first2=Ricarda |last3=Clare |first3=Lee |last4=Nykamp |first4=Moritz |last5=Schütt |first5=Brigitta |date=2019 |title=Göbekli Tepe: A Brief Description of the Environmental Development in the Surroundings of the UNESCO World Heritage Site |journal=Land |language=en |volume=8 |issue=4 |pages=72 |doi=10.3390/land8040072 |ref={{harvid|Knitter et al.|2019}} |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Köksal-Schmidt |first1=Çiğdem |last2=Schmidt |first2=Klaus |year=2010 |title=The Göbekli Tepe "Totem Pole": A First Discussion of an Autumn 2010 Discovery (PPN, Southeastern Turkey) |url=http://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_2010_1.pdf |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=2010 |issue=1 |pages=74–76 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Kromer |first1=Bernd |last2=Schmidt |first2=Klaus |year=1998 |title=Two Radiocarbon Dates from Göbekli Tepe, South Eastern Turkey |url=https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_1998_3.pdf |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=1998 |issue=3 |page=8 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Lang |first1=Caroline |last2=Peters |first2=Joris |last3=Pöllath |first3=Nadja |last4=Schmidt |first4=Klaus |last5=Grupe |first5=Gisela |date=2013 |title=Gazelle behaviour and human presence at early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, south-east Anatolia |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00438243.2013.820648 |journal=World Archaeology |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=410–429 |doi=10.1080/00438243.2013.820648 |issn=0043-8243 |ref={{harvid|Lang et al.|2013}} |s2cid=161637995 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Lloyd |first1=Seton |author-link=Seton Lloyd |last2=Brice |first2=William |date=1951 |title=Harran |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/anatolian-studies/article/abs/harran/061CB1112066E8E145559B1F9A9A5586 |journal=Anatolian Studies |language=en |volume=1 |pages=77–111 |doi=10.2307/3642359 |issn=2048-0849 |jstor=3642359 |s2cid=240812354 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Maher |first1=Lisa A. |last2=Richter |first2=Tobias |last3=Stock |first3=Jay T. |year=2012 |title=The Pre-Natufian Epipaleolithic: Long-term Behavioral Trends in the Levant |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/evan.21307 |journal=Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews |language=en |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=69–81 |doi=10.1002/evan.21307 |issn=1520-6505 |pmid=22499441 |s2cid=32252766 }}
* {{Cite magazine |last=Mann |first=Charles C. |date=2011 |title=The Birth of Religion: The World's First Temple |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2011/06/gobeki-tepe/#:~:text=The%20Birth%20of%20Religion&text=Dating%20to%20at%20least%208000,or%20gods—began%20to%20appear. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180820065725/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2011/06/gobeki-tepe/#:~:text=The%20Birth%20of%20Religion&text=Dating%20to%20at%20least%208000,or%20gods—began%20to%20appear. |url-status=dead |archive-date=20 August 2018 |magazine=National Geographic |volume=219 |issue=6 – June 2011 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Meskell |first=Lynn |author-link=Lynn Meskell |date=September 2008 |title=The nature of the beast: curating animals and ancestors at Çatalhöyük |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00438240802261416 |journal=World Archaeology |language=en |volume=40 |issue=3 |pages=373–389 |doi=10.1080/00438240802261416 |s2cid=26968373 |issn=0043-8243 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Mithen |first=Steven |title=After the Ice:A global human history, 20,000–5000 BC |date=2004 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=0-674-01570-3 |location=Cambridge MA |authorlink=Steven Mithen}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Moetz |first1=Fevzi Kemal |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289819398 |title=Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East |last2=Çelik |first2=Bahattin |publisher=Harrassowitz |year=2012 |isbn=978-3-447-06684-6 |editor-last=Matthews |editor-first=Roger |location=Wiesbaden |chapter=T-shaped pillar sites in the landscape around Urfa |editor-last2=Curtis |editor-first2=John }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Neef |first=Reinder |date=2003 |title=Overlooking the Steppe-Forest: A Preliminary Report on the Botanical Remains from Early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe (Southeastern Turkey) |url=https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_2003_2.pdf |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=2002 |issue=3 |pages=13–16 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Peters |first1=Joris |last2=Schmidt |first2=Klaus |date=2004 |title=Animals in the symbolic world of Pre-Pottery Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, south-eastern Turkey: a preliminary assessment |url=https://www.academia.edu/4807320 |journal=Anthropozoologica |volume=39 |issue=1 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Peters |first1=Joris |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315417653-12/long-winding-road-ungulate-ex-ploitation-domestication-early-neolithic-anatolia-10000-7000-cal-bc-joris-peters-hijlke-buitenhuis-gisela-grupe-klaus-schmidt-nadja-p%C3%B6llath |title=The Origins and Spread of Domestic Animals in Southwest Asia and Europe |last2=Buitenhuis |first2=Hijlke |last3=Grupe |first3=Gisela |last4=Schmidt |first4=Klaus |last5=Pöllath |first5=Nadja |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-315-41765-3 |editor-last=Colledge |editor-first=Sue |location=London |language=en |chapter=The Long and Winding Road: Ungulate Exploitation and Domestication in Early Neolithic Anatolia (10000–7000 cal BC) |doi=10.4324/9781315417653 |ref={{harvid|Peters et al.|2013}} |editor-last2=Conolly |editor-first2=James |editor-last3=Dobney |editor-first3=Keith |editor-last4=Manning |editor-first4=Katie |editor-last5=Shennan |editor-first5=Stephen }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Peters |first1=Joris |first2=Klaus|last2=Schmidt|first3=Laura|last3= Dietrich |first4=Oliver|last4= Dietrich |first5=Nadja|last5=Pöllath | first6=Moritz |last6=Kinzel|first7=Lee|last7= Clare| chapter= Göbekli Tepe: Agriculture and Domestication|editor-first=Claudia |editor-last=Smith |title= Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology|publisher= Springer|location= New York|year=2020| doi=10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_2226|pages= 4607-16}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Pustovoytov |first=Konstantin |year=2002 |title=14C Dating of Pedogenic Carbonate Coatings on Wall Stones at Göbekli Tepe (Southeastern Turkey) |url=https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_2002_2.pdf |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=2002 |issue=2 |pages=3–4 }}
* {{cite book|last=Qasim|first=Erika|chapter=The T-shaped monuments of Gobekli Tepe: Posture of the Arms|editor1-last=Sütterlin|editor1-first=Christa|editor2-last=Schiefenhövel|editor2-first=Wulf|editor3-last=Lehmann|editor3-first=Christian|editor4-last=Forster|editor4-first=Johanna|editor5-last=Apfelauer|editor5-first=Gerhard|title=Art as Behaviour: An Ethological Approach to Visual and Verbal Art, Music and Architecture|publisher=BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität|location=Oldenburg|year=2014|pages=252–272|isbn=9783814222905}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Richter |first1=Tobias |last2=Darabi |first2=Hojjat |last3=Alibaigi |first3=Sajjad |last4=Arranz-Otaegui |first4=Amaia |last5=Bangsgaard |first5=Pernille |last6=Khosravi |first6=Shokouh |last7=Maher |first7=Lisa |last8=Mortensen |first8=Peder |author-link8=Peder Mortensen |last9=Pedersen |first9=Patrick |last10=Roe |first10=Joe |last11=Yeomans |first11=Lisa |title=The Formation of Early Neolithic Communities in the Central Zagros: an 11,500 year-old communal structure at Asiab |journal=Oxford Journal of Archaeology |date=February 2021 |volume=40 |issue=1 |pages=2–22 |doi=10.1111/ojoa.12213 |s2cid=234033394 |ref={{harvid|Richter et al.|2021}}}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Scham |first=Sandra |date=2008 |title=The World's First Temple |url=http://www.archaeology.org/0811/abstracts/turkey.html |journal=Archaeology |volume=61 |issue=6 – November/December 2008 |access-date=14 October 2008 |archive-date=29 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120329113052/http://www.archaeology.org/0811/abstracts/turkey.html |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |author-link=Klaus Schmidt (archaeologist) |date=1998 |title=Frühneolithische Tempel. Ein Forschungsbericht zum präkeramischen Neolithikum Obermesopotamiens |journal=Mitteilungen der deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft |location=Berlin |issue=130 |pages=17–49 |issn=0342-118X}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |year=1999 |title=Boars, Ducks, and Foxes – the Urfa-Project 99 |url=https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_1999_3.pdf |journal=Neo-Lithics |volume=1999 |issue=3 |pages=12–15 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |year=2000 |title=Zuerst kam der Tempel, dann die Stadt." Vorläufiger Bericht zu den Grabungen am Göbekli Tepe und am Gürcütepe 1995–1999 |journal=Istanbuler Mitteilungen |issue=50 |pages=5–41}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |date=2000a |title=Göbekli Tepe and the rock art of the Near East |journal=Tüba-Ar |issue=3 |pages=1–14 |doi=10.22520/tubaar.2000.0001 |doi-broken-date=17 March 2024 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |date=2000b |title=Göbekli Tepe, Southeastern Turkey. A preliminary Report on the 1995–1999 Excavations |url=http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/paleo_0153-9345_2000_num_26_1_4697 |journal=Paléorient |location=Paris |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=45–54 |doi=10.3406/paleo.2000.4697 |issn=0153-9345 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |title=Sie bauten die ersten Tempel. Das rätselhafte Heiligtum der Steinzeitjäger |publisher=[[C.H. Beck]] |year=2006 |isbn=3-406-53500-3 |location=München |language=de}}
* {{Cite book |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |title=Erste Tempel – Frühe Siedlungen. 12000 Jahre Kunst und Kultur, Ausgrabungen und Forschungen zwischen Donau und Euphrat |publisher=Florian Isensee |year=2009 |isbn=978-3-89995-563-7 |editor-last=Schmidt |editor-first=Klaus |location=Oldenburg |language=de |chapter=Göbekli Tepe. Eine Beschreibung der wichtigsten Befunde erstellt nach den Arbeiten der Grabungsteams der Jahre 1995–2007}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |date=2010 |title=Göbekli Tepe – the Stone Age Sanctuaries: New results of ongoing excavations with a special focus on sculptures and high reliefs |url=http://arheologija.ff.uni-lj.si/documenta/authors37/37_21.pdf |journal=Documenta Praehistorica |volume=37 |issue=XXXVII |pages=239–56 |doi=10.4312/dp.37.21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120131114925/http://arheologija.ff.uni-lj.si/documenta/authors37/37_21.pdf |archive-date=31 January 2012 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |title=The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia: (10,000-323 BCE) |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-19-537614-2 |editor-last=Steadman |editor-first=Sharon R. |chapter=Göbekli Tepe: A Neolithic Site in Southwestern Anatolia |editor-last2=McMahon |editor-first2=Gregory |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TY3t4y_L5SQC&pg=PA917 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |title=A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East |publisher=Blackwell |year=2012 |editor-last=Potts |editor-first=Daniel |location=Oxford |pages=144–160 |chapter=Anatolia}}
* {{Cite book |last=Schmidt |first=Klaus |title=Le premier temple: Göbekli Tepe |publisher=CNRS éditions |year=2015 |isbn=978-2-271-08160-5 |location=Paris |language=fr |translator-last=Guiot-Houdart |translator-first=Thérèse}}
* {{Cite book |last=Schönicke |first=Julia |title=Bridging the Gap: Disciplines, Times, and Spaces in Dialogue |volume=1 |year=2019 |chapter=There and Back Again — Towards a New Understanding of Abandonment Practices at the Neolithic Settlement of Göbekli Tepe |pages=210–237 |chapter-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358411654 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Stordeur |first=Danielle |date=2003 |title=Des crânes surmodelés à Tell Aswad de Damascène (PPNB - Syrie) |url=https://www.persee.fr/doc/paleo_0153-9345_2003_num_29_2_4767 |journal=Paléorient |language=fr |volume=29 |issue=2 |pages=109–115 |doi=10.3406/paleo.2003.4767 |issn=0153-9345 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Strebe |first=Matthew |title=Göbekli Tepe, Turkey |url=https://globalheritagefund.org/places/gobekli-tepe-turkey/ |access-date=11 August 2021 |website=Global Heritage Fund |date=3 November 2015 }}
* {{Cite news |last=Symmes |first=Patrick |date=18 February 2010 |title=Turkey: Archeological Dig Reshaping Human History |language=en |work=Newsweek |url=https://www.newsweek.com/turkey-archeological-dig-reshaping-human-history-75101 }}
* {{Cite web |title=Our Project |url=https://www.dainst.blog/the-tepe-telegrams/home/ |access-date=5 April 2021 |website=Tepe Telegrams |ref={{harvid|Tepe Telegrams}} }}
* {{Cite web |title=Göbekli Tepe |url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1572 |website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre |ref={{harvid|UNESCO World Heritage Centre}} }}
* {{cite book|last=Yeşilyurt|first=Metin|chapter=Die wissenschaftliche Interpretation von Göbeklitepe: Die Theorie und das Forschungsprogramm|title=Neolithikum und ältere Metallzeiten. Studien und Materialien|volume=2|publisher=Lit Verlag|location=Berlin|year=2014|isbn=978-3-643-12528-6}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Watkins |first=Trevor |year=2010 |title=New light on Neolithic revolution in south-west Asia |journal=Antiquity |language=en |volume=84 |issue=325 |pages=621–634 |doi=10.1017/S0003598X00100122 |issn=0003-598X |doi-access=free |authorlink=Trevor Watkins}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Watkins |first=Trevor |date=14 August 2017 |title=From Pleistocene to Holocene: the prehistory of southwest Asia in evolutionary context |journal=History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences |language=en |volume=39 |issue=3 |pages=22 |doi=10.1007/s40656-017-0152-3 |issn=1742-6316 |pmc=5556129 |pmid=28808914 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Zeder |first1=Melinda A. |last2=Smith |first2=Bruce D. |year=2009 |title=A Conversation on Agricultural Origins: Talking Past Each Other in a Crowded Room |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/605553 |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=50 |issue=5 |pages=681–691 |doi=10.1086/605553 |issn=0011-3204 |jstor=10.1086/605553 |authorlink1=Melinda A. Zeder |authorlink2=Bruce D. Smith |s2cid=41194691 }}
* {{Cite news |last=Zekîoğlu |first=Jînda |date=2020 |title=Kêmasîya ku li Girê Mirazan derketîye holê bêdewletbûna kurdan e |language=ku |work=Le Monde diplomatique kurdî |issue=57 |url=https://diplo-kurdi.com/index.php/ku/node/2038 |access-date=5 April 2021 |archive-date=2 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210602214843/https://diplo-kurdi.com/index.php/ku/node/2038 |url-status=dead }}
{{refend}}

==External links==
* {{Commons category-inline|Göbekli Tepe}}
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVMxHWcnT8o&list=PLmXaxHgt2ww8u6j2uOlnGRQTWLrk8FPkt&index=12 Goblekli Tepe: A Summary of Past and Recent Results – Lee Clare] Oriental Institute lecture 9 March 2020
* [https://artsandculture.google.com/story/g%C3%B6bekli-tepe/OALyoXJ7tDcpLA Explore Göbekli Tepe in the UNESCO collection on Google Arts and Culture]
* [https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1572/ Göbekli Tepe], UNESCO World Heritage List
* ''[https://www.dainst.blog/the-tepe-telegrams/ Tepe Telegrams]'', blog of the [[German Archaeological Institute|DAI]]'s Göbekli Tepe Research project
* {{Megalithic Portal|14968}}
* [https://www.exoriente.org/associated_projects/ppnd_site.php?s=25 Göbekli Tepe], Platform for Neolithic Radiocarbon Dates (PPND)
* [https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/gobekli-tepe-5a4d25c355ff48d59ab76c36812b9cf3 3D model] of the site

{{Neolithic Southwest Asia}}
{{World Heritage Sites in Turkey}}
{{Middle Eastern megaliths}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Gobekli Tepe}}
[[Category:Göbekli Tepe| ]]
[[Category:Populated places established in the 10th millennium BC]]
[[Category:Populated places disestablished in the 8th millennium BC]]
[[Category:1963 archaeological discoveries]]
[[Category:Archaeological sites in Southeastern Anatolia]]
[[Category:Archaeological sites of prehistoric Anatolia]]
[[Category:Buildings and structures in Şanlıurfa Province]]
[[Category:Former populated places in Turkey]]
[[Category:History of Şanlıurfa Province]]
[[Category:Lost ancient cities and towns]]
[[Category:Megalithic monuments in the Middle East]]
[[Category:Prehistoric art in Turkey]]
[[Category:Tells (archaeology)]]
[[Category:World Heritage Sites in Turkey]]
[[Category:Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]]
[[Category:Pre-Pottery Neolithic A]]