# Heterojunction

A heterojunction is an interface between two layers or regions of dissimilar semiconductors. These semiconducting materials have unequal band gaps as opposed to a homojunction. It is often advantageous to engineer the electronic energy bands in many solid-state device applications, including semiconductor lasers, solar cells and transistors. The combination of multiple heterojunctions together in a device is called a heterostructure, although the two terms are commonly used interchangeably. The requirement that each material be a semiconductor with unequal band gaps is somewhat loose, especially on small length scales, where electronic properties depend on spatial properties. A more modern definition of heterojunction is the interface between any two solid-state materials, including crystalline and amorphous structures of metallic, insulating, fast ion conductor and semiconducting materials.

## Manufacture and applications

Heterojunction manufacturing generally requires the use of molecular beam epitaxy (MBE)[1] or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technologies in order to precisely control the deposition thickness and create a cleanly lattice-matched abrupt interface. A recent alternative under research is the mechanical stacking of layered materials into van der Waals heterostructures.[2]

Despite their expense, heterojunctions have found use in a variety of specialized applications where their unique characteristics are critical:

## Energy band alignment

The three types of semiconductor heterojunctions organized by band alignment.
Band diagram for staggered gap, n-n semiconductor heterojunction at equilibrium.

The behaviour of a semiconductor junction depends crucially on the alignment of the energy bands at the interface. Semiconductor interfaces can be organized into three types of heterojunctions: straddling gap (type I), staggered gap (type II) or broken gap (type III) as seen in the figure.[7] Away from the junction, the band bending can be computed based on the usual procedure of solving Poisson's equation.

Various models exist to predict the band alignment.

• The simplest (and least accurate) model is Anderson's rule, which predicts the band alignment based on the properties of vacuum-semiconductor interfaces (in particular the vacuum electron affinity). The main limitation is its neglect of chemical bonding.
• A common anion rule was proposed which guesses that since the valence band is related to anionic states, materials with the same anions should have very small valence band offsets. This however did not explain the data but is related to the trend that two materials with different anions tend to have larger valence band offsets than conduction band offsets.
• Tersoff[8] proposed a gap state model based on more familiar metal–semiconductor junctions where the conduction band offset is given by the difference in Schottky barrier height. This model includes a dipole layer at the interface between the two semiconductors which arises from electron tunneling from the conduction band of one material into the gap of the other (analogous to metal-induced gap states). This model agrees well with systems where both materials are closely lattice matched[9] such as GaAs/AlGaAs.
• The 60:40 rule is a heuristic for the specific case of junctions between the semiconductor GaAs and the alloy semiconductor AlxGa1−xAs. As the x in the AlxGa1−xAs side is varied from 0 to 1, the ratio ${\displaystyle \Delta E_{C}/\Delta E_{V}}$ tends to maintain the value 60/40. For comparison, Anderson's rule predicts ${\displaystyle \Delta E_{C}/\Delta E_{V}=0.73/0.27}$ for a GaAs/AlAs junction (x=1).[10][11]

The typical method for measuring band offsets is by calculating them from measuring exciton energies in the luminescence spectra.[11]

## Effective mass mismatch

When a heterojunction is formed by two different semiconductors, a quantum well can be fabricated due to difference in band structure. In order to calculate the static energy levels within the achieved quantum well, understanding variation or mismatch of the effective mass across the heterojunction becomes substantial. The quantum well defined in the heterojunction can be treated as a finite well potential with width of ${\displaystyle l_{w}}$. In addition, in 1966, Conley et al.[12] and BenDaniel and Duke[13] reported a boundary condition for the envelope function in a quantum well, known as BenDaniel–Duke boundary condition. According to them, the envelope function in a fabricated quantum well must satisfy a boundary condition which states that ${\displaystyle \psi (z)}$ and ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{m^{*}}}{\partial \over {\partial z}}\psi (z)\,}$ are both continuous in interface regions.

Mathematical details worked out for quantum well example.

Using the Schrödinger equation for a finite well with width of ${\displaystyle l_{w}}$and center at 0, the equation for the achieved quantum well can be written as:

${\displaystyle -{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2m_{b}^{*}}}{\frac {\mathrm {d} ^{2}\psi (z)}{\mathrm {d} z^{2}}}+V\psi (z)=E\psi (z)\quad \quad {\text{ for }}z<-{\frac {l_{w}}{2}}\quad \quad (1)}$
${\displaystyle \quad \quad -{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2m_{w}^{*}}}{\frac {\mathrm {d} ^{2}\psi (z)}{\mathrm {d} z^{2}}}=E\psi (z)\quad \quad {\text{ for }}-{\frac {l_{w}}{2}}
${\displaystyle -{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2m_{b}^{*}}}{\frac {\mathrm {d} ^{2}\psi (z)}{\mathrm {d} z^{2}}}+V\psi (z)=E\psi (z)\quad {\text{ for }}z>+{\frac {l_{w}}{2}}\quad \quad (3)}$

Solution for above equations are well-known, only with different(modified) k and ${\displaystyle \kappa }$ [14]

${\displaystyle k={\frac {\sqrt {2m_{w}E}}{\hbar }}\quad \quad \kappa ={\frac {\sqrt {2m_{b}(V-E)}}{\hbar }}\quad \quad (4)}$.

At the z = ${\displaystyle +{\frac {l_{w}}{2}}}$ even-parity solution can be gained from

${\displaystyle A\cos({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})=B\exp(-{\frac {\kappa l_{w}}{2}})\quad \quad (5)}$.

By taking derivative of (5) and multiplying both sides by ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{m^{*}}}}$

${\displaystyle -{\frac {kA}{m_{w}^{*}}}\sin({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})=-{\frac {\kappa B}{m_{b}^{*}}}\exp(-{\frac {\kappa l_{w}}{2}})\quad \quad (6)}$.

Dividing (6) by (5), even-parity solution function can be obtained,

${\displaystyle f(E)=-{\frac {k}{m_{w}^{*}}}\tan({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})-{\frac {\kappa }{m_{b}^{*}}}=0\quad \quad (7)}$.

Similarly, for odd-parity solution,

${\displaystyle f(E)=-{\frac {k}{m_{w}^{*}}}\cot({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})+{\frac {\kappa }{m_{b}^{*}}}=0\quad \quad (8)}$.

For numerical solution, taking derivatives of (7) and (8) gives

even parity:

${\displaystyle {\frac {df}{dE}}={\frac {1}{m_{w}^{*}}}{\frac {dk}{dE}}\tan({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})+{\frac {k}{m_{w}^{*}}}\sec ^{2}({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})\times {\frac {l_{w}}{2}}{\frac {dk}{dE}}-{\frac {1}{m_{b}^{*}}}{\frac {d\kappa }{dE}}\quad \quad (9-1)}$

odd parity:

${\displaystyle {\frac {df}{dE}}={\frac {1}{m_{w}^{*}}}{\frac {dk}{dE}}\cot({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})-{\frac {k}{m_{w}^{*}}}\csc ^{2}({\frac {kl_{w}}{2}})\times {\frac {l_{w}}{2}}{\frac {dk}{dE}}+{\frac {1}{m_{b}^{*}}}{\frac {d\kappa }{dE}}\quad \quad (9-2)}$

where ${\displaystyle {\frac {dk}{dE}}={\frac {\sqrt {2m_{w}^{*}}}{2{\sqrt {E}}\hbar }}\quad \quad \quad {\frac {d\kappa }{dE}}=-{\frac {\sqrt {2m_{b}^{*}}}{2{\sqrt {V-E}}\hbar }}}$.

The difference in effective mass between materials results in a larger difference in ground state energies.

## Nanoscale heterojunctions

Image of a nanoscale heterojunction between iron oxide (Fe3O4 — sphere) and cadmium sulfide (CdS — rod) taken with a TEM. This staggered gap (type II) offset junction was synthesized by Hunter McDaniel and Dr. Moonsub Shim at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign in 2007.

In quantum dots the band energies are dependent on crystal size due to the quantum size effects. This enables band offset engineering in nanoscale heterostructures. It is possible[15] to use the same materials but change the type of junction, say from straddling (type I) to staggered (type II), by changing the size or thickness of the crystals involved. The most common nanoscale heterostructure system is ZnS on CdSe (CdSe@ZnS) which has a straddling gap (type I) offset. In this system the much larger band gap ZnS passivates the surface of the fluorescent CdSe core thereby increasing the quantum efficiency of the luminescence. There is an added bonus of increased thermal stability due to the stronger bonds in the ZnS shell as suggested by its larger band gap. Since CdSe and ZnS both grow in the zincblende crystal phase and are closely lattice matched, core shell growth is preferred. In other systems or under different growth conditions it may be possible to grow anisotropic structures such as the one seen in the image on the right.

It has been shown[16] that the driving force for charge transfer between conduction bands in these structures is the conduction band offset. By decreasing the size of CdSe nanocrystals grown on TiO2, Robel et al.[16] found that electrons transferred faster from the higher CdSe conduction band into TiO2. In CdSe the quantum size effect is much more pronounced in the conduction band due to the smaller effective mass than in the valence band, and this is the case with most semiconductors. Consequently, engineering the conduction band offset is typically much easier with nanoscale heterojunctions. For staggered (type II) offset nanoscale heterojunctions, photoinduced charge separation can occur since there the lowest energy state for holes may be on one side of the junction whereas the lowest energy for electrons is on the opposite side. It has been suggested[16] that anisotropic staggered gap (type II) nanoscale heterojunctions may be used for photocatalysis, specifically for water splitting with solar energy.

## References

1. ^ a b Smith, C.G (1996). "Low-dimensional quantum devices". Rep. Prog. Phys. 59 (1996) 235282, pg 244.
2. ^ Geim, A. K.; Grigorieva, I. V. (2013). "Van der Waals heterostructures". Nature. 499 (7459): 419–425. arXiv:1307.6718. doi:10.1038/nature12385. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 23887427. S2CID 205234832.
3. ^ Okuda, Koji; Okamoto, Hiroaki; Hamakawa, Yoshihiro (1983). "Amorphous Si/Polycrystalline Si Stacked Solar Cell Having More Than 12% Conversion Efficiency". Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 22 (9): L605–L607. doi:10.1143/JJAP.22.L605.
4. ^ Yamamoto, Kenji; Yoshikawa, Kunta; Uzu, Hisashi; Adachi, Daisuke (2018). "High-efficiency heterojunction crystalline Si solar cells". Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 57 (8S3): 08RB20. doi:10.7567/JJAP.57.08RB20.
5. ^ "HJT - Heterojunction Solar Cells". Solar Power Panels. Retrieved 2022-03-25.
6. ^ Kroemer, H. (1963). "A proposed class of hetero-junction injection lasers". Proceedings of the IEEE. 51 (12): 1782–1783. doi:10.1109/PROC.1963.2706.
7. ^ Ihn, Thomas (2010). "ch. 5.1 Band engineering". Semiconductor Nanostructures Quantum States and Electronic Transport. United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 66. ISBN 9780199534432.
8. ^ J. Tersoff (1984). "Theory of semiconductor heterojunctions: The role of quantum dipoles". Physical Review B. 30 (8): 4874–4877. Bibcode:1984PhRvB..30.4874T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.30.4874.
9. ^ Pallab, Bhattacharya (1997), Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-495656-7
10. ^ Adachi, Sadao (1993-01-01). Properties of Aluminium Gallium Arsenide. ISBN 9780852965580.
11. ^ a b Debbar, N.; Biswas, Dipankar; Bhattacharya, Pallab (1989). "Conduction-band offsets in pseudomorphic InxGa1-xAs/Al0.2Ga0.8As quantum wells (0.07≤x≤0.18) measured by deep-level transient spectroscopy". Physical Review B. 40 (2): 1058–1063. Bibcode:1989PhRvB..40.1058D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.40.1058. PMID 9991928.
12. ^ Conley, J.; Duke, C.; Mahan, G.; Tiemann, J. (1966). "Electron Tunneling in Metal–Semiconductor Barriers". Physical Review. 150 (2): 466. Bibcode:1966PhRv..150..466C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.150.466.
13. ^ Bendaniel, D.; Duke, C. (1966). "Space-Charge Effects on Electron Tunneling". Physical Review. 152 (2): 683. Bibcode:1966PhRv..152..683B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.152.683.
14. ^ Griffiths, David J. (2004). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-111892-7
15. ^ Ivanov, Sergei A.; Piryatinski, Andrei; Nanda, Jagjit; Tretiak, Sergei; Zavadil, Kevin R.; Wallace, William O.; Werder, Don; Klimov, Victor I. (2007). "Type-II Core/Shell CdS/ZnSe Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Electronic Structures, and Spectroscopic Properties". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129 (38): 11708–19. doi:10.1021/ja068351m. PMID 17727285.
16. ^ a b c Robel, István; Kuno, Masaru; Kamat, Prashant V. (2007). "Size-Dependent Electron Injection from Excited CdSe Quantum Dots into TiO2Nanoparticles". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129 (14): 4136–7. doi:10.1021/ja070099a. PMID 17373799.