Isopogon baxteri
Stirling Range Coneflower | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
(unranked): | |
(unranked): | |
Order: | |
Family: | |
Genus: | |
Species: | I. baxteri
|
Binomial name | |
Isopogon baxteri | |
Synonyms | |
Atylus baxteri (R.Br.) Kuntze |
Isopogon baxteri, commonly known as the Stirling Range coneflower, is a small shrub that is endemic to the southwest of Western Australia.[1]
Taxonomy
The species was first formally described by botanist Robert Brown in 1830, based on material collected by William Baxter at King George's Sound.[2] In 1891, German botanist Otto Kuntze published Revisio generum plantarum, his response to what he perceived as a lack of method in existing nomenclatural practice.[3] Because Isopogon was based on Isopogon anemonifolius,[4] and that species had already been placed by Richard Salisbury in the segregate genus Atylus in 1807,[5] Kuntze revived the latter genus on the grounds of priority, and made the new combination Atylus baxteri for this species.[6] However, Kuntze's revisionary program was not accepted by the majority of botanists.[3] Ultimately, the genus Isopogon was nomenclaturally conserved over Atylus by the International Botanical Congress of 1905.[7]
References
- ^ "Isopogon baxteri". FloraBase. Western Australian Government Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.
- ^ Brown, Robert (1830). Supplementum primum Prodromi florae Novae Hollandiae. London, United Kingdom: Richard Taylor. p. 9.
- ^ a b Erickson, Robert F. "Kuntze, Otto (1843–1907)". Botanicus.org. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
- ^ Knight, Joseph (1809). On the Cultivation of the Plants Belonging to the Natural Order of Proteeae. London, United Kingdom: W. Savage. p. 94.
- ^ Hooker, William (1805). The Paradisus Londinensis. Vol. 1. London, United Kingdom: D. N. Shury.
- ^ Kuntze, Otto (1891). Revisio generum plantarum:vascularium omnium atque cellularium multarum secundum leges nomenclaturae internationales cum enumeratione plantarum exoticarum in itinere mundi collectarum. Leipzig, Germany: A. Felix. p. 578.
- ^ "Congrès international de Botanique de Vienne". Bulletin de la Société botanique de France. 52: LII. 1905.