Jump to content

Kingdom (biology): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m correcting grammar
Line 9: Line 9:
[[Image:Haeckel arbol bn.png|thumb|250px|[[Ernst Haeckel]]'s presentation of a three-kingdom system ([[Plant]]ae, [[Protist]]a, [[Animal]]ia) in his 1866 ''Generelle Morphologie der Organismen'').]]
[[Image:Haeckel arbol bn.png|thumb|250px|[[Ernst Haeckel]]'s presentation of a three-kingdom system ([[Plant]]ae, [[Protist]]a, [[Animal]]ia) in his 1866 ''Generelle Morphologie der Organismen'').]]


==Five kingdoms== <!-- This section is linked from [[Monera]] -->
==Brandon is gay== <!-- This section is linked from [[Monera]] -->
[[Robert Whittaker]] recognized an additional kingdom for the [[Fungus|Fungi]]. The resulting '''five-kingdom system''', proposed in 1968, has become a popular standard and with some refinement is still used in many works, or forms the basis for newer multi-kingdom systems. It is based mainly on differences in [[nutrition]]: his Plantae were mostly multicellular [[autotroph]]s, his Animalia multicellular [[heterotroph]]s, and his Fungi multicellular [[saprotroph]]s. The remaining two kingdoms, Protista and Monera, included unicellular and simple cellular colonies.<ref name="Whittaker1969">{{cite journal | author = R. H. Whittaker | year = 1969 | title = New concepts of kingdoms of organisms | journal = Science | volume = 163 | pages = 150–160 }}</ref>
[[Robert Whittaker]] recognized an additional kingdom for the [[Fungus|Fungi]]. The resulting '''five-kingdom system''', proposed in 1968, has become a popular standard and with some refinement is still used in many works, or forms the basis for newer multi-kingdom systems. It is based mainly on differences in [[nutrition]]: his Plantae were mostly multicellular [[autotroph]]s, his Animalia multicellular [[heterotroph]]s, and his Fungi multicellular [[saprotroph]]s. The remaining two kingdoms, Protista and Monera, included unicellular and simple cellular colonies.<ref name="Whittaker1969">{{cite journal | author = R. H. Whittaker | year = 1969 | title = New concepts of kingdoms of organisms | journal = Science | volume = 163 | pages = 150–160 }}</ref>



Revision as of 19:43, 10 March 2008

LifeDomainKingdomPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusSpecies
The hierarchy of biological classification's eight major taxonomic ranks. A domain contains one or more kingdoms. Intermediate minor rankings are not shown.

From biological taxonomy, a kingdom or regnum is a taxonomic rank in either (historically) the highest rank, or (in the new three-domain system) the rank below domain. Each kingdom is divided into smaller groups called phyla (or in some contexts these are called "divisions"). Currently, textbooks from the United States use a system of six kingdoms (Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protoctista, Archaea, and Monera), while British and Australian textbooks describe five kingdoms (Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protista, and Prokaryota or Monera).

Carolus Linnaeus distinguished two kingdoms of living things: Animalia for animals and Vegetabilia for plants (Linnaeus also treated minerals, placing them in a third kingdom, Mineralia). Linnaeus divided each kingdom into classes, later grouped into phyla for animals and divisions for plants.


It gradually became apparent how important the prokaryote/eukaryote distinction is, and Stanier and van Niel popularized Chatton's proposal in the 1960s.[1]

Ernst Haeckel's presentation of a three-kingdom system (Plantae, Protista, Animalia) in his 1866 Generelle Morphologie der Organismen).

Brandon is gay

Robert Whittaker recognized an additional kingdom for the Fungi. The resulting five-kingdom system, proposed in 1968, has become a popular standard and with some refinement is still used in many works, or forms the basis for newer multi-kingdom systems. It is based mainly on differences in nutrition: his Plantae were mostly multicellular autotrophs, his Animalia multicellular heterotrophs, and his Fungi multicellular saprotrophs. The remaining two kingdoms, Protista and Monera, included unicellular and simple cellular colonies.[2]

Six kingdoms

In the years around 1980 there was an emphasis on phylogeny and redefining the kingdoms to be monophyletic groups, groups made up of relatively closely related organisms. The Animalia, Plantae, and Fungi were generally reduced to core groups of closely related forms, and the others placed into the Protista. Based on rRNA studies Carl Woese divided the prokaryotes (Kingdom Monera) into two kingdoms, called Eubacteria and Archaebacteria. Carl Woese attempted to establish a Three Primary Kingdom (or Urkingdom) system in which Plants, Animals, Protista, and Fungi were lumped into one primary kingdom of all eukaryotes. The Eubacteria and Archaebacteria made up the other two urkingdoms. The initial use of "six Kingdom systems" represents a blending of the classic Five Kingdom system and Woese's Three Kingdom system. Such six Kingdom systems have become standard in many works.[3]

A variety of new eukaryotic kingdoms were also proposed, but most were quickly invalidated, ranked down to phyla or classes, or abandoned. The only one which is still in common use is the kingdom Chromista proposed by Cavalier-Smith, including organisms such as kelp, diatoms, and water moulds. Thus the eukaryotes are divided into three primarily heterotrophic groups, the Animalia, Fungi, and Protozoa, and two primarily photosynthetic groups, the Plantae (including red and green algae) and Chromista. However, it has not become widely used because of uncertainty over the monophyly of the latter two kingdoms.

Woese stresses genetic similarity over outward appearances and behaviour, relying on comparisons of ribosomal RNA genes at the molecular level to sort out classification categories. A plant does not look like an animal, but at the cellular level, both groups are eukaryotes, having similar subcellular organization, including cell nuclei, which the Eubacteria and Archaebacteria do not have. More importantly, plants, animals, fungi, and protists are more similar to each other in their genetic makeup at the molecular level, based on rRNA studies, than they are to either the Eubacteria or Archaebacteria. Woese also found that all of the eukaryotes, lumped together as one group, are more closely related, genetically, to the Archaebacteria than they are to the Eubacteria. This means that the Eubacteria and Archaebacteria are separate groups even when compared to the eukaryotes. So, Woese established the Three-domain system, clarifying that all the Eukaryotes are more closely genetically related compared to their genetic relationship to either the bacteria or the archaebacteria, without having to replace the "six kingdom systems" with a three kingdom system. The Three Domain system is a "six kingdom system" that unites the eukaryotic kingdoms into the Eukarya Domain based on their relative genetic similarity when compared to the Bacteria Domain and the Archaea Domain. Woese also recognized that the Protista Kingdom is not a monophyletic group and might be further divided at the level of Kingdom. Others have divided the Protista Kingdom into the Protozoa and the Chromista, for instance.

Recent Advances

Classification is an ongoing area of research and discussion. As new findings and technologies become available they allow the refinement of the model. For example, gene sequencing techniques allow the comparison of the genome of different groups (Phylogenomics). A study published in 2007 by Fabien Burki, et al[4] proposes four high level groups of eukaryotes based on phylogenomics research.

  1. Plantae (green and red algae, and plants)
  2. Opisthokonts (amoebas, fungi, and animals)
  3. Excavata (free-living and parasitic protists)
  4. SAR (acronym for Stramenopiles, Alveolates, and Rhizaria–the names of some of its members. Burki found that the previously split groups Rhizaria and Chromalveolates were more similar in 123 common genes than once thought.)

Summary

Linnaeus
1735[5]
Haeckel
1866[6]
Chatton
1925[7]
Copeland
1938[8]
Whittaker
1969[2]
Woese et al.
1990[9]
Cavalier-Smith
1998,[10] 2015[11]
2 kingdoms 3 kingdoms 2 empires 4 kingdoms 5 kingdoms 3 domains 2 empires,
6/7 kingdoms
(not treated) Protista Prokaryota Monera Monera Bacteria Bacteria
Archaea Archaea (2015)
Eukaryota Protoctista Protista Eucarya "Protozoa"
"Chromista"
Vegetabilia Plantae Plantae Plantae Plantae
Fungi Fungi
Animalia Animalia Animalia Animalia Animalia

(Note that the equivalences in this table are not perfect. e.g. Haeckell placed the red algae (Haeckell's Florideae; modern Florideophyceae) and blue-green algae (Haeckell's Archephyta; modern Cyanobacteria) in his Plantae, but in modern classifications they are considered protists and bacteria respectively. However, despite this and other failures of equivalence, the table gives a useful simplification; empires are erroneously attributed to Chatton in the table who did not rank the 2 groups nor formally name them).

References

  1. ^ R. Y. Stanier and C. B. van Niel (1962). "The concept of a bacterium". Arch. Microbiol. 42: 17–35.
  2. ^ a b R. H. Whittaker (1969). "New concepts of kingdoms of organisms". Science. 163: 150–160. Cite error: The named reference "Whittaker1969" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  3. ^ C. R. Woese, W. E. Balch, L. J. Magrum, G. E. Fox and R. S. Wolfe (1977). "An ancient divergence among the bacteria". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 9: 305–311.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Burki, Fabien (July 26, 2007). "Phylogenomics Reshuffles the Eukaryotic Supergroups". PLoS ONE. 2 (8) (published August 29, 2007): e790. doi:10.1371.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  5. ^ Linnaeus, C. (1735). Systemae Naturae, sive regna tria naturae, systematics proposita per classes, ordines, genera & species.
  6. ^ Haeckel, E. (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Reimer, Berlin.
  7. ^ Chatton, É. (1925). "Pansporella perplexa. Réflexions sur la biologie et la phylogénie des protozoaires". Annales des Sciences Naturelles - Zoologie et Biologie Animale. 10-VII: 1–84.
  8. ^ Copeland, H. (1938). "The kingdoms of organisms". Quarterly Review of Biology. 13 (4): 383–420. doi:10.1086/394568. S2CID 84634277.
  9. ^ Woese, C.; Kandler, O.; Wheelis, M. (1990). "Towards a natural system of organisms:proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 87 (12): 4576–9. Bibcode:1990PNAS...87.4576W. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576. PMC 54159. PMID 2112744.
  10. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (1998). "A revised six-kingdom system of life". Biological Reviews. 73 (3): 203–66. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x. PMID 9809012. S2CID 6557779.
  11. ^ Ruggiero, Michael A.; Gordon, Dennis P.; Orrell, Thomas M.; Bailly, Nicolas; Bourgoin, Thierry; Brusca, Richard C.; Cavalier-Smith, Thomas; Guiry, Michael D.; Kirk, Paul M.; Thuesen, Erik V. (2015). "A higher level classification of all living organisms". PLOS ONE. 10 (4): e0119248. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1019248R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248. PMC 4418965. PMID 25923521.


In 1998 Cavalier-Smith divided Protista in 2 new kingdoms: Chromista the phylogenetic group of golden-brown algae that includes those algae whose chloroplasts contain chlorophylls a and c, as well as various colorless forms that are closely related to them, and Protozoa, the kingdom of protozoans.

Empires Kingdoms
Prokaryota Bacteria
Eukaryota Animalia Plantae Fungi Chromista Protozoa
  • Cavalier-Smith, T. 2004. Only six kingdoms of life. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 1251-1262. (pdf click).


See also

External links

  1. The five kingdom concept
  2. Whittaker's classification