Mapping controversies (MC) is an academic course taught in science studies, stemming from the writings of the French sociologist and philosopher Bruno Latour. MC focuses exclusively on the controversies surrounding scientific knowledge rather than the established scientific facts or outcomes. Thus, it helps sociologists, anthropologists and other social scientists get insights not into scientific knowledge per se, but rather into the process of gaining knowledge. Thus, MC sheds light on those intermediate stages corresponding to the actual research process and pinpoints the connections between scientific work and other types of activities.
The term "mapping controversies" was first suggested in relation to analysis of scientific and technological controversies, and then lately re-affirmed as a widely applicable methodological approach going beyond the boundaries of Science Studies. It is usually used for the methodology that identifies and tracks down the polemics or debate surrounding a scientific fact, and utilises various visualisation tools to present the problem in its complexity.
- Hess, DJ. Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction. NYU Press, 1997
- "Mapping Controversies to interaction". web.mit.edu. Retrieved 2009-02-15.
- Latour., B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1987
- Latour, B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005
- MACOSPOL www.macospol.eu Retrieved on 2009-02-16
- www.mappingcontroversies.net Retrieved on 2009-12-21
- Média Lab Sciences Po sciences-po.fr Retrieved on 2017-06-21
- MIT web.mit.edu Retrieved on 2009-02-16
- Ecoles Polytechniques Fédérales de Lausanne Archived 2012-07-12 at Archive.today mappingcontroversies.epfl.ch Retrieved on 2009-02-16
- University of Manchester mappingcontroversies.co.uk Retrieved on 2009-02-16
- Yaneva, A., Rabesandratana, T., Greiner, B. Staging Scientific Controversies: a Gallery Test on Science Museums’ Interactivity, Public Understanding of Science 2009, 18(1): 79-90.