# Milnor number

In mathematics, and particularly singularity theory, the Milnor number, named after John Milnor, is an invariant of a function germ.

If f is a complex-valued holomorphic function germ then the Milnor number of f, denoted μ(f), is either a nonnegative integer, or is infinite. It can be considered both a geometric invariant and an algebraic invariant. This is why it plays an important role in algebraic geometry and singularity theory.

## Algebraic definition

Consider a holomorphic complex function germ

${\displaystyle f:(\mathbb {C} ^{n},0)\to (\mathbb {C} ,0)\ }$

and denote by ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{n}}$ the ring of all function germs ${\displaystyle (\mathbb {C} ^{n},0)\to (\mathbb {C} ,0)}$. Every level of a function is a complex hypersurface in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}}$, therefore we will call ${\displaystyle f}$ a hypersurface singularity.

Assume it is an isolated singularity: in case of holomorphic mappings we say that a hypersurface singularity ${\displaystyle f}$ is singular at ${\displaystyle 0\in \mathbb {C} ^{n}}$ if its gradient ${\displaystyle \nabla f}$ is zero at ${\displaystyle 0}$, a singular point is isolated if it is the only singular point in a sufficiently small neighbourhood. In particular, the multiplicity of the gradient

${\displaystyle \mu (f)=\dim _{\mathbb {C} }{\mathcal {O}}_{n}/\nabla f}$

is finite. This number ${\displaystyle \mu (f)}$ is the Milnor number of singularity ${\displaystyle f}$ at ${\displaystyle 0}$.

Note that the multiplicity of the gradient is finite if and only if the origin is an isolated critical point of f.

## Geometric interpretation

Milnor originally[1] introduced ${\displaystyle \mu (f)}$ in geometric terms in the following way. All fibers ${\displaystyle f^{-1}(c)}$ for values ${\displaystyle c}$ close to ${\displaystyle 0}$ are nonsingular manifolds of real dimension ${\displaystyle 2(n-1)}$. Their intersection with a small open disc ${\displaystyle D_{\epsilon }}$ centered at ${\displaystyle 0}$ is a smooth manifold ${\displaystyle F}$ called the Milnor fiber. Up to diffeomorphism ${\displaystyle F}$ does not depend on ${\displaystyle c}$ or ${\displaystyle \epsilon }$ if they are small enough. It is also diffeomorphic to the fiber of the Milnor fibration map.

The Milnor fiber ${\displaystyle F}$ is a smooth manifold of dimension ${\displaystyle 2(n-1)}$ and has the same homotopy type as a bouquet of ${\displaystyle \mu (f)}$ spheres ${\displaystyle S^{n-1}}$. This is to say that its middle Betti number ${\displaystyle b_{n-1}(F)}$ is equal to the Milnor number and it has homology of a point in dimension less than ${\displaystyle n-1}$. For example, a complex plane curve near every singular point ${\displaystyle z_{0}}$ has its Milnor fiber homotopic to a wedge of ${\displaystyle \mu _{z_{0}}(f)}$ circles (Milnor number is a local property, so it can have different values at different singular points).

Thus we have equalities

Milnor number = number of spheres in the wedge = middle Betti number of ${\displaystyle F}$ = degree of the map ${\displaystyle z\to {\frac {{\nabla }f(z)}{\|{\nabla }f(z)\|}}}$ on ${\displaystyle S_{\epsilon }}$ = multiplicity of the gradient ${\displaystyle \nabla f}$

Another way of looking at Milnor number is by perturbation. We say that a point is a degenerate singular point, or that f has a degenerate singularity, at ${\displaystyle z_{0}\in \mathbb {C} ^{n}}$ if ${\displaystyle z_{0}}$ is a singular point and the Hessian matrix of all second order partial derivatives has zero determinant at ${\displaystyle z_{0}}$:

${\displaystyle \det \left({\frac {\partial ^{2}f}{\partial z_{i}\partial z_{j}}}\right)_{1\leq i\leq j\leq n}^{z=z_{0}}=0.}$

We assume that f has a degenerate singularity at 0. We can speak about the multiplicity of this degenerate singularity by thinking about how many points are infinitesimally glued. If we now perturb the image of f in a certain stable way the isolated degenerate singularity at 0 will split up into other isolated singularities which are non-degenerate! The number of such isolated non-degenerate singularities will be the number of points that have been infinitesimally glued.

Precisely, we take another function germ g which is non-singular at the origin and consider the new function germ h := f + εg where ε is very small. When ε = 0 then h = f. The function h is called the morsification of f. It is very difficult to compute the singularities of h, and indeed it may be computationally impossible. This number of points that have been infinitesimally glued, this local multiplicity of f, is exactly the Milnor number of f.

Further contributions[2] give meaning to Milnor number in terms of dimension of the space of versal deformations, i.e. the Milnor number is the minimal dimension of parameter space of deformations that carry all information about initial singularity.

## Examples

Here we give some worked examples in two variables. Working with only one is too simple and does not give a feel for the techniques, whereas working with three variables can be quite tricky. Two is a nice number. Also we stick to polynomials. If f is only holomorphic and not a polynomial, then we could have worked with the power series expansion of f.

### 1

Consider a function germ with a non-degenerate singularity at 0, say ${\displaystyle f(x,y)=x^{2}+y^{2}}$. The Jacobian ideal is just ${\displaystyle \langle 2x,2y\rangle =\langle x,y\rangle }$. We next compute the local algebra:

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{f}={\mathcal {O}}/\langle x,y\rangle =\langle 1\rangle .}$

To see why this is true we can use Hadamard's lemma which says that we can write any function ${\displaystyle h\in {\mathcal {O}}}$ as

${\displaystyle h(x,y)=k+xh_{1}(x,y)+yh_{2}(x,y)}$

for some constant k and functions ${\displaystyle h_{1}}$ and ${\displaystyle h_{2}}$ in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}}$ (where either ${\displaystyle h_{1}}$ or ${\displaystyle h_{2}}$ or both may be exactly zero). So, modulo functional multiples of x and y, we can write h as a constant. The space of constant functions is spanned by 1, hence ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{f}=\langle 1\rangle }$

It follows that μ(f) = 1. It is easy to check that for any function germ g with a non-degenerate singularity at 0 we get μ(g) = 1.

Note that applying this method to a non-singular function germ g we get μ(g) = 0.

### 2

Let ${\displaystyle f(x,y)=x^{3}+xy^{2}}$, then

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{f}={\mathcal {O}}/\langle 3x^{2}+y^{2},xy\rangle =\langle 1,x,y,x^{2}\rangle .}$

So in this case ${\displaystyle \mu (f)=4}$.

### 3

One can show that if ${\displaystyle f(x,y)=x^{2}y^{2}+y^{3}}$ then ${\displaystyle \mu (f)=\infty .}$

This can be explained by the fact that f is singular at every point of the x-axis.

## Versal Deformations

Let f have finite Milnor number μ, and let ${\displaystyle g_{1},\ldots ,g_{\mu }}$ be a basis for the local algebra, considered as a vector space. Then a miniversal deformation of f is given by

${\displaystyle F:(\mathbb {C} ^{n}\times \mathbb {C} ^{\mu },0)\to (\mathbb {C} ,0),}$
${\displaystyle F(z,a):=f(z)+a_{1}g_{1}(z)+\cdots +a_{\mu }g_{\mu }(z),}$

where ${\displaystyle (a_{1},\dots ,a_{\mu })\in \mathbb {C} ^{\mu }}$. These deformations (or unfoldings) are of great interest in much of science.[citation needed]

## Invariance

We can collect function germs together to construct equivalence classes. One standard equivalence is A-equivalence. We say that two function germs ${\displaystyle f,g:(\mathbb {C} ^{n},0)\to (\mathbb {C} ,0)}$ are A-equivalent if there exist diffeomorphism germs ${\displaystyle \phi :(\mathbb {C} ^{n},0)\to (\mathbb {C} ^{n},0)}$ and ${\displaystyle \psi :(\mathbb {C} ,0)\to (\mathbb {C} ,0)}$ such that ${\displaystyle f\circ \phi =\psi \circ g}$: there exists a diffeomorphic change of variable in both domain and range which takes f to g.

If f and g are A-equivalent then μ(f) = μ(g).

Nevertheless, the Milnor number does not offer a complete invariant for function germs, i.e. the converse is false: there exist function germs f and g with μ(f) = μ(g) which are not A-equivalent. To see this consider ${\displaystyle f(x,y)=x^{3}+y^{3}}$ and ${\displaystyle g(x,y)=x^{2}+y^{5}}$. We have ${\displaystyle \mu (f)=\mu (g)=4}$ but f and g are clearly not A-equivalent since the Hessian matrix of f is equal to zero while that of g is not (and the rank of the Hessian is an A-invariant, as is easy to see).

## References

1. ^ Milnor, John (1969). Singular points of Complex Hypersurfaces. Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press.
2. ^ Arnold, V.I.; Gusein-Zade, S.M.; Varchenko, A.N. (1988). Singularities of differentiable maps. Vol. 2. Birkhäuser.