Jump to content

Misleading of parliament

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 04:22, 2 February 2018 (Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The misleading of parliament is the knowing presentation of false information to parliament, a very serious charge in Westminster-style parliamentary assemblies.[1][2] Government ministers that are found to have misled parliament will generally lose their ministerial portfolio. By convention, a minister found to have misled parliament is expected to resign or face being sacked.[citation needed] The Scottish Government ministerial code requires ministers to resign if they mislead Parliament.[3][4] For witnesses giving testimony to an Australian parliamentary committee, giving misleading evidence can be considered a contempt of parliament.[5]

See more

References

  1. ^ "Lateline - 11/08/2003: Latham accuses Howard of misleading Parliament. Australian Broadcasting Corp". www.abc.net.au. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  2. ^ Inside Parliament: Minister's apology fails to satisfy MPs: Handling of 'misleading' answer over Bill for disabled people angers both sides of House - Parliament held in contempt, Speaker told
  3. ^ http://www.yousufhamid.com/2009/05/salmond-misleading-parliament.html[permanent dead link]
  4. ^ Scottish Government (June 2008). Scottish Ministerial Code: A code of conduct and guidance on procedures for Members of the Scottish Government and Junior Scottish Ministers (PDF). p. 6. It is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to the Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity. Ministers who knowingly mislead the Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the First Minister
  5. ^ Appearing as a witness at a Parliamentary committee hearing Archived 2009-06-29 at the Wayback Machine