NGO Monitor: Revision history

23 May 2012

• curprev 15:0515:05, 23 May 2012 Dailycare talk contribs 32,655 bytes −2 →Criticism: from talk too
• curprev 07:4407:44, 23 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 32,657 bytes +213 →Criticism: as per talk page

21 May 2012

• curprev 14:0214:02, 21 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 32,444 bytes +326 Undid revision 493658279 by BothHandsBlack (talk)reverting just in case this edit would be a breach of 1rr
• curprev 13:5313:53, 21 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 32,118 bytes −427 →Political Orientation: removed from this section since it is in the criticism section
• curprev 13:3513:35, 21 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 32,545 bytes −326 →Criticism: These references only mention NGOM in a very broad context and, whilst they characterise it negatively, they do not provide any substantive criticisms or information for the reader of our article.
• curprev 13:1213:12, 21 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 32,871 bytes +141 →Criticism: added more newman critiques
• curprev 12:5912:59, 21 May 2012 Shrike talk contribs 32,730 bytes −570 →Criticism: Per WP:UNDUE I am triming this Why criticism by Newman deserves such large space anyhow the section itself is big
• curprev 07:2507:25, 21 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 33,300 bytes +164 →Criticism: reverting to last edit by DLV - the recent sequence of edits on this paragraph have gutted the substance of Newman's criticism. Please discuss on the talk page as these are significant changes.

20 May 2012

• curprev 13:1413:14, 20 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs m 33,136 bytes 0 →Criticism
• curprev 12:2412:24, 20 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 33,136 bytes +43 →Criticism: reducing the size of this paragraph and leaving all important info in.
• curprev 12:0912:09, 20 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 33,093 bytes −131 →Criticism: also removed that sentence - it just repeats what was in the sentence before it. not sure the transparency issue should be in there since under funding, it is all clear.
• curprev 12:0612:06, 20 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 33,224 bytes −76 Undid revision 493474181 by Dlv999 (talk) that is newman's opinion. it is not RS for anything other than what newman thinks. i will see how to reword it.
• curprev 10:4910:49, 20 May 2012 Dlv999 talk contribs 33,300 bytes +76 →Criticism: That the group is refusing to investigate illegal activity of right wing groups is crucial to the criticism being made (per cited RS)

8 May 2012

• curprev 13:2713:27, 8 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs m 33,224 bytes +74 →Funding: Added reference for clarity
• curprev 13:2513:25, 8 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs m 33,150 bytes −2 →Funding: Changed 'agency' to 'body' to avoid repetition.

7 May 2012

• curprev 17:1217:12, 7 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 33,152 bytes −32 →Funding: removed 'special status' as well. Not really relevant.
• curprev 17:1117:11, 7 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 33,184 bytes −9 removed 'however'.
• curprev 16:5916:59, 7 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 33,193 bytes −2 Undid revision 491207683 by Soosim (talk) Your problem previously was the source for the previous sentence. This is a new sentence with a new source.
• curprev 16:4216:42, 7 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 33,195 bytes +2 →Funding: moved to next paragraph - not sure why BHB moved it when still being discussed on talk page....strange,no?
• curprev 16:2216:22, 7 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 33,193 bytes +7 →Funding
• curprev 16:2216:22, 7 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 33,186 bytes −323 →Funding: removed the +972 stuff
• curprev 16:2116:21, 7 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 33,509 bytes +386 →Funding: Added sentence as per suggestion on RS/N
• curprev 09:0409:04, 7 May 2012 Dlv999 talk contribs 33,123 bytes −361 →Criticism: How is NGO monitors mission statement relevant? This is OR.
• curprev 09:0109:01, 7 May 2012 Dlv999 talk contribs 33,484 bytes −159 →Criticism: Editor OR based on primary source
• curprev 06:4306:43, 7 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 33,643 bytes +1,132 →Criticism: added NGOM's comments about newman's comments about NGOM
• curprev 05:2505:25, 7 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 32,511 bytes −69 →Criticism: tightening it a bit, and removing non-NGOM related info. will add NGOM response shortly

6 May 2012

• curprev 19:3119:31, 6 May 2012 Dlv999 talk contribs 32,580 bytes +1,049 →Criticism: +
• curprev 16:0116:01, 6 May 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 31,531 bytes −6 That's not OR. That is sourced to NGOM's own published accounts - see the previous paragraph for links.
• curprev 15:5815:58, 6 May 2012 Slatersteven talk contribs 31,537 bytes +6 →Funding
• curprev 06:1706:17, 6 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 31,531 bytes −22 No edit summary
• curprev 06:1006:10, 6 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 31,553 bytes +467 →External links: added two publications
• curprev 06:0606:06, 6 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 31,086 bytes +595 added two publications
• curprev 05:5305:53, 6 May 2012 Soosim talk contribs 30,491 bytes +340 →Political Orientation: re-added removed content, but to a different, hopefully more acceptable to BHB, section

5 May 2012

• curprev 23:2723:27, 5 May 2012 Helpful Pixie Bot talk contribs m 30,151 bytes +3 ISBNs (Build KC)

29 April 2012

• curprev 07:1307:13, 29 April 2012 Soosim talk contribs 30,148 bytes −2 →Funding: moved to next paragraph where it makes more sense....

27 April 2012

• curprev 13:5813:58, 27 April 2012 92.225.176.163 talk 30,150 bytes +325 →Funding: Changes as per talk page

22 April 2012

• curprev 12:0012:00, 22 April 2012 Soosim talk contribs 29,825 bytes −377 Undid revision 488638155 by Soosim (talk) why did my mouse double click????
• curprev 12:0012:00, 22 April 2012 Soosim talk contribs 30,202 bytes +377 Undid revision 488630635 by BothHandsBlack (talk) jafi funding already discussed in this section
• curprev 11:4611:46, 22 April 2012 Soosim talk contribs 29,825 bytes −377 Undid revision 488630635 by BothHandsBlack (talk) jafi funding already discussed in this section
• curprev 10:3810:38, 22 April 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 30,202 bytes +377 →Funding: additions, as per talk page
• curprev 09:5909:59, 22 April 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 29,825 bytes −352 →Other: This is not an 'other' type of reception anymore than it is praise. It is a description and not an evaluative reception. It is on the same level as saying that NGOM has 10 staff.
• curprev 06:4106:41, 22 April 2012 Soosim talk contribs 30,177 bytes +352 →Reception

20 April 2012

• curprev 15:4215:42, 20 April 2012 BothHandsBlack talk contribs 29,825 bytes −340 →Praise: Description as a 'human rights watchdog' does not belong in the 'Praise' section. It is descriptive and not evaluative.

18 April 2012

• curprev 13:1513:15, 18 April 2012 FrescoBot talk contribs m 30,165 bytes −11 Bot: link syntax/spacing and minor changes

1 April 2012

• curprev 18:3518:35, 1 April 2012 Dailycare talk contribs 30,176 bytes −15 partially rv - we had a discussion on how to present this, and whereas we didn't arrive at a concrete solution the gist of the discussion was to use just "Jerusalem" when possible to avoid just this kind of issues

31 March 2012

• curprev 17:5317:53, 31 March 2012 Soosim talk contribs 30,191 bytes +36 sean - half the city is, and the other half is too. it is not anywhere else. and yes, we are all waiting for permanent status talks. anyway - western is fine.
• curprev 15:1115:11, 31 March 2012 Sean.hoyland talk contribs 30,155 bytes −12 okay, if you want to say Jerusalem we can't say it is in Israel since half of the city isn't. so, decide which you want, west or Israel
• curprev 14:4314:43, 31 March 2012 79.181.201.165 talk 30,167 bytes −3 No edit summary
• curprev 14:4314:43, 31 March 2012 79.181.201.165 talk 30,170 bytes −20 There is no "western section" in Jerusalem.

22 March 2012

• curprev 19:2119:21, 22 March 2012 Perplexed566 talk contribs m 30,190 bytes 0 →Funding: capitalization.