Pennsylvania Mock Trial Competition
The Pennsylvania Mock Trial Competition is a high school Mock Trial competition in Pennsylvania sponsored by the Pennsylvania Bar Association Young Lawyers Division. The winning school of the state finals advances to the National High School Mock Trial Championship. The Pennsylvania Mock Trial Competition first began in 1984.[1] The case material is usually released early in November, within the first two weeks.
Trial Format
Opening Statements
A trial starts with a 5-minute [2] opening statement by the Plaintiff/Prosecution (depending on whether the case is civil or criminal, respectively), which is immediately followed by a 5-minute opening statement by the defense.[3]
Witness Testimony
After opening statements, the plaintiff/prosecution calls its first witness.[4] The plaintiff/prosecution conducts a direct examination of the witness, and then defense conducts a cross examination of the same witness. After cross-examination, plaintiff/prosecution has the opportunity to conduct a redirect examination of the witness. If they do, defense is given the chance to recross the witness.[5] After either all four types of exams have been conducted or one party abstains from doing redirect or recross respectively, the witness steps down from the stand. This process is then repeated for two more plaintiff/prosecution witnesses. With the conclusion of testimony from the third plaintiff witness, the plaintiff rests. The Defense then calls three witnesses in the same manner described above for the plaintiff/prosecution.
Each team has 30 minutes [6] for witness testimony, including all direct, cross, redirect, and recross examinations conducted by counsel of that team. (The clock does stop, however, for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, objections and parts of the process for entering exhibits.[7])
Closing Arguments
Once the third defense witness has finished giving testimony, the defense gives their closing argument. Like opening statements, closing arguments are limited to 5 minutes apiece.[8] After defense closes, plaintiff/prosecution gives its closing statement. This is a deviation from standard courtroom procedure, in which the plaintiff/prosecution closes first, followed by the defense, after which the plaintiff/prosecution may offer a rebuttal. In Mock Trial, this deviation allows each team to have the opportunity to speak first, one for opening statements and one for closing arguments. Barring any disputes being raised, the second closing argument marks the conclusion of the trial, and the jury is dismissed to tally points.
Scoring & Winner
Each member of the jury scores each part of the trial based on specific scoring categories, such as the flow of a direct examination or the effectiveness of a cross-examination. Each opening statement or closing argument is worth a maximum of 10 points. Each direct or cross-examination is also worth, at most, 10 points. Each witness can earn a maximum of 10 points independent of any other points from direct examination. There is one team evaluation category scored at the end of the trial, valued at a maximum of 10 points. Therefore, each team can earn up to 120 points during the trial.[9]
On any juror's ballot, the team with more points is the winner of that scoresheet. Each juror indicates which team he/she would choose to win if the points of the scoresheet after any penalties are assessed, adds up to a tie. Each scoresheet is worth one vote. Whichever team receives more votes is declared the winner of the trial. If there is an even number of jurors and they have a split decision, the team with total points on all of the scoresheets is the winner.[10]
Past Cases
| Year | Name | Subject of Case |
|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Marshall v. Priestley College[11] | Civil Liability |
| 1998 | Commonwealth v. Walker[12] | Conspiracy and Delivery of a Controlled Substance |
| 1999 | Smith v. Lorcin[13] | Negligence |
| 2000 | Commonwealth v. Krupp[14] | Voluntary Manslaughter |
| 2001 | Gorey v. Bushing[15] | Civil Liability |
| 2002 | Commonwealth v. McGrath[16] | Arson |
| 2003 | Day v. Knight[17] | Negligence |
| 2004 | Commonwealth v. Max Ability[18] | Theft |
| 2005 | Gallo v. Urbanski[19] | Civil Liability (and First Amendment rights) |
| 2006 | Commonwealth v. Olson[20] | Third-Degree Murder |
| 2007 | Anderson v. Williams[21] | Civil Cyberstalking Laws |
| 2008 | Commonwealth v. Sinclair[22] | Kidnapping |
| 2009 | Hansbra v. Plane's Park & Polish, LLC[23] | Negligence |
| 2010 | Commonwealth of PA v. Legan Arabach[24] | Third-Degree Murder |
| 2011 | The Estate of Simone Langston v. Dr. Lefu Harrison[25] | Competency to Consent |
| 2012 | The Wisawe Chapter of Friends of Bog Turtles v. ZenoPharma, Inc.[26] | Critical habitat determination |
| 2013 | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tatum Zillias [27] | Third-Degree Murder |
| 2014 | The Estate of Jordan Simon v. Ruffed Grouse High School [28] | Wrongful death |
| 2015 | The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Harper Marmalard [29] | First Degree |
| 2016 | Lilienthal Insurance, Inc. v. Natural Habitat Preserve [30] | Insurance Indemnification |
| 2017 | The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Taylor Edsel[31] | Arson |
Past Winners
References
- ^ The Wisawe Chapter of Friends of Bog Turtles v. ZenoPharma, Inc- Introduction and Acknowledgements
- ^ 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.23
- ^ 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.10(b)
- ^ 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 4.1
- ^ 2011 PA Mock Trial Rules of Evidence- Rule 611d
- ^ [1]
- ^ 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.26
- ^ 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.23
- ^ [2]
- ^ 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 8.1 (g) iii
- ^ Marshall v. Priestley College
- ^ Commonwealth v. Walker
- ^ Smith v. Lorcin
- ^ Commonwealth v. Krupp
- ^ Gorey v. Bushing
- ^ Commonwealth v. McGrath
- ^ Day v. Knight
- ^ Commonwealth v. Max Ability
- ^ Gallo v. Urbanski
- ^ Commonwealth v. Olson
- ^ Anderson v. Williams
- ^ Commonwealth v. Sinclair
- ^ Hansbra v. Plane's Park & Polish, LLC
- ^ Commonwealth of PA v. Legan Arabach
- ^ The Estate of Simone Langston v. Dr Lefu Harrison
- ^ The Wisawe Chapter of Friends of Bog Turtles v. ZenoPharma, Inc.
- ^ Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tatum Zillias
- ^ Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tatum Zillias
- ^ [3]
- ^ [4]
- ^ "2017 Pennsylvania Statewide High School Mock Trial Competition" (PDF).
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 18, 2010
- ^ PBA Press Release- April, 2000
- ^ PBA Press Release- April, 2001
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 23, 2002
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 31, 2003
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 29, 2004
- ^ Westmoreland Bar Association Newsletter- March-April 2005
- ^ PBA Press Release- April 3, 2006
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 31, 2007
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 29, 2008
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 28, 2009
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 27, 2010
- ^ PBA Press Release- March 26, 2011
- ^ Lancaster Online- McCaskey team takes 2nd place in Pa. mock trial