|This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2015)|
A personalized gun, or smart gun, is a firearm that only fires when activated by an authorized user, in order to prevent misuse, accidental shootings, gun thefts, use of the weapon against the owner, and self-harm. Smart guns distinguish between authorized users and unauthorized users in several different ways, including the use of RFID chips or other proximity tokens, fingerprint recognition, magnetic rings, or mechanical locks. Related to smart guns are other smart firearms safety devices such as biometric or RFID activated accessories and safes.
- 1 Advantages
- 2 Smart Gun Models
- 3 Legislation
- 4 Magnetic devices
- 5 Criticism
- 6 References
- 7 External links
Smart firearms safety technology has several stated benefits. Smart guns would prevent accidental use and misuse of firearms by children and teens, as well as reducing accidental discharges or the use of a firearm against its owner if the firearm is stolen or taken away. According to the Harvard School of Public Health, "Means reduction", or reducing a suicidal person’s access to highly lethal means, is an important part of a comprehensive approach to suicide prevention.
Law enforcement applications also hold promise; San Francisco Police Chief Greg Suhr went on record supporting smart guns for their potential to reduce the risk of having a law enforcement officer's gun used against him, and for rendering stolen guns unfirable and safe.
Smart Gun Models
iGun Technology Corp.
Led by Jonathan Mossberg, iGun Technology Corporation has developed 12-gauge shotgun that uses magnetic spectrum token technology, similar in function to RFID, to secure the gun. The shotgun is activated when in close proximity to the token, a ring worn on the trigger hand of the user. A 2013 report by the National Institute of Justice stated that iGun's product "could be considered the first personalized firearm to go beyond a prototype to an actual commercializable or production-ready product." Mossberg trademarked the term "SmartGun".
Safe Gun Technology Co.
Safe Gun Technology Co., led by CEO Tom Lynch, is developing fingerprint retrofit kits to be installed on home defense guns. Their retrofit technology, once installed, required an authorized user's fingerprint to unlock the gun and make it ready to fire. Safe Gun Tech is currently field-testing their fingerprint retrofit kit on an AR-15 rifle.
CEO Kai Kloepfer, a high school student in Boulder, Colorado, has a working smart gun prototype that uses a fingerprint sensor to unlock the firearms safety. It can be programmed to register a range of fingerprints so that the gun would be able to be used by all the members of a police force. This prototype also promises to reduce risk of accidental shootings. 
Kai received special attention as a result of a video produced for Uproxx Tech, "Has This 18-Year-Old Created The World’s Safest Gun?", which has received more than 20 million views across platforms. He was also featured in the New York Times in an article written by Nicholas Kristof, "Smart Guns Save Lives. So Where Are They?"
New Jersey Institute of Technology
New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT)'s smart guns relies on biometric sensors in the grip and trigger that can track a gun owner’s hand size, strength, and Dynamic grip style, also known as (DGR) Dynamic Grip Recognition. The gun is programmed to recognize only the owner or anyone whom the owner wishes to authorize.
In May 2014 BBC News reported that Biomac, a US and Austrian company, was working on a firearm system that uses optical sensors to measure the biometric data below a user's skin in order to determine whether the individual holding the gun is the rightful owner of the weapon. Such a weapon would not fire if the sensors do not recognize the biometric data of one of its authorized user or users. The company also stated that it could also retro-fit older weapons to employ the this technology. However, the report highlighted the fact that RFID tags can be easily hacked, and that fingerprint scanners can be easily compromised, though it is unclear whether such breaches would work on smart guns.
Australian defense company Metal Storm made a prototype electronic 'smart' personalized handgun called the O'Dwyer VLe. It utilized biometric authorizing technology and was the world's first 100% electronic handgun. It also incorporated Metal Storm's patented 'stacked projectile' technology, which, in cohesion with the nature of the weapon system itself, meant that there was no moving parts, no separate magazine, no ammunition feed, and it outstripped conventional firing systems.
Smart Tech Challenges Foundation
In 2013, the nonprofit Smart Tech Challenges Foundation was founded with the mission to foster innovation in firearm safety by Ron Conway. The Foundation awarded development grants to innovators including Jonathan Mossberg, Tom Lynch, Robert McNamara, Omer Kiyani, and Kai Kloepfer.
In the United States, New Jersey passed the Childproof Handgun Bill into state law on December 23, 2002, which will eventually require that all guns sold in the state of New Jersey have a mechanism to prevent unauthorized users from firing it. Weapons used by law enforcement officers would be exempt from the smart gun requirement. However, this law will only take effect three years after such a smart gun is approved by the state.
In May 2014, New Jersey State Senate Majority leader, Loretta Weinberg, who had originally sponsored the New Jersey bill while serving in the State Assembly, stated that she would consider repealing the law if, after doing so, the National Rifle Association would agree not to impede the development of better smart guns.
In April 2014, Attorney General Eric Holder told a House appropriations subcommittee that his agency is exploring smart gun technology as a means for curbing gun violence. The Justice Department requested $382.1 million in increased spending for its fiscal year 2014 budget for "gun safety," a figure which includes $2 million for "Gun Safety Technology" grants, which would award prizes for technologies that are "proven to be reliable and effective."
In October 2013 the European Commission published a document by commissioner Cecilia Malmström, stating that "the Commission will work with the firearms industry to explore technological solutions, such as biometric sensors where personal data is stored in the firearm, for ensuring that purchased firearms may only be used by their legal owner. It will carry out a detailed cost-benefit analysis on the question of making such 'smart gun' security features mandatory for firearms lawfully sold in the EU."
The Magna-Trigger system for K- through N-frame size Smith & Wesson revolvers prevents the trigger from returning far enough to fire. It was developed by Joe Davis in 1975, and has proven reliable. This system will work ambidextrously, provided the magnetic rings used are worn on both hands.
The Magloc conversion kit for 1911A1 pistols works by preventing the handgun from firing unless a magnetic ring worn by the user repels the magnetic blocking device installed inside the grip. Once the system is activated using the matching magnetic ring, the owner can switch the over-ride switch to the on position and allow anyone to fire the pistol.
The smart gun is supposed to:
- Reduce the likelihood of unintentional injuries to children
- Preventing teenage suicides and homicides.
- Limit the violent acts committed by criminals using stolen guns.
- Protect law enforcement officers from criminals grabbing their firearms during a struggle.
If battery failure occurs one of two things can happen:
- For civilian use, the gun can be set to not fire.
- For law enforcement and military use, the safety system will be bypassed, and the gun will function like a normal firearm.
Smart guns have been criticized by gun-rights groups like the NRA as well as by gun-control groups like the Violence Policy Center. The Violence Policy Center argues that smart guns will make firearm ownership more commonplace by making firearms seem safer.
Many firearm enthusiasts object to smart guns on a philosophical and regulatory basis. Gun ownership advocate Kenneth W. Royce, writing under the pen name of "Boston T. Party", wrote that "no defensive firearm should ever rely upon any technology more advanced than Newtonian physics. That includes batteries, radio links, encryption, scanning devices and microcomputers."
In an article in Forbes, information security expert Joseph Steinberg discussed several technological shortcomings with smart guns that might “create new, serious safety issues for gun owners and non-owners alike.” Among them were claims that “biometrics take time to process and are often inaccurate – especially when a user is under duress – as is likely going to be the case in any situation in which he needs to brandish a gun,” “it is not ideal to add a requirement for power to devices utilized in cases of emergency that did not need electricity previously. How many fire codes allow fire extinguishers that require a battery to operate?,” “smartguns might be hackable” or even “susceptible to government tracking or jamming,” and “Firearms must be able to be disassembled in order to be cleaned and maintained. One of the principles of information security is that someone who has physical access to a machine can undermine its security."
The potential effects of New Jersey's smart gun law has also influenced opposition to the technology in the United States; two attempts to commercially market the Armatix iP1 smart gun in the California and Maryland were met with immediate opposition from gun rights groups, who argued that allowing the gun to be sold in the United States would trigger the law. The NRA also briefly boycott Smith & Wesson after it was revealed in 1999 that the company was developing a smart gun for the U.S. government.
Gun Rights side proposes that smart guns will be detrimental to the second amendment of the constitution which states that every citizen has the constitutional right to bear arms. As per them, smart guns defy the purpose of self-protection as it might fail to respond quickly in an emergency (which might be due to unavailability of the accompanying radio device at the moment).
While the gun control side see it as a mere tool to take away the real issue off the radar. They have maintained that the introduction of smart guns is going to have a negligent effect on reducing the gun violence for the apparent reason that people use their own guns anyway when committing acts of gun-violence. They have gone further and suggested that it will actually end up deterring government’s focus from gun-violence research.
- "No Chip in Arm, No Shot From Gun". Wired.com. Retrieved 2012-08-04.
- "'Smart' Guns Backgrounder" (PDF). Violence Policy Center. Retrieved April 17, 2015.
- "Means Matter". Means Matter. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
- "Can tech innovation curb gun violence? Smart Tech poses 4 million-dollar challenges to find out". VentureBeat. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
- Greene, Mark (June 2013). "A Review of Gun Safety Technologies". National Institute of Justice.
- Bienaimé, Pierre (December 14, 2014). "Military & Defense More: Guns Arms Arms Industry Gun ControlA Look At The 'Smart Guns' That Could Prevent Future Tragedies". Business Insider.
- Carter, Gregg Lee (2012). Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. ABC-CLIO. p. 755. ISBN 978-0-313-38670-1.
- "Safe Gun Technology - Where Freedom Meets Safety". Safe Gun Technology - Where Freedom Meets Safety. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
- Seitz, Dan. "Has This 18-Year-Old Created The World’s Safest Gun?". Upoxx. Uproxx. Retrieved 18 April 2015.
- UPROXX. "Has This 18-Year-Old Created The World's Safest Gun?". UPROXX. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
- Kristof, Nicholas (2015-01-17). "Smart Guns Save Lives. So Where Are They?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
- Carter, Gregg Lee (2006). Gun Control in the United States: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. pp. 373–374. ISBN 978-1-85109-760-9.
- TriggerSmart Childproof RFID Smart Gun on YouTube
- Tufnell, Nicholas (May 23, 2014). "Smart guns: How smart are they?". BBC News.
- Jones, Ashby (November 20, 2013). "New iP1 Pistol May Trigger Old Gun Law in New Jersey". The Wall Street Journal.
- Hanlon, Mike. "Personalised, electronic handgun headed for commercialisation". Gizmag. Retrieved April 17, 2015.
- ASSEMBLY LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO ASSEMBLY, No. 700 with committee amendments
- "Gun control: the NRA wants to take America's smart guns away". The Verge. Retrieved 5 May 2014.
- Pearce, Jeremy (January 12, 2003). "Smart Guns, A Clever Bit of Legislating". The New York Times. Retrieved 1 December 2003.
- Nix, Naomi (October 14, 2013). "Could 'smart-guns' finally hit New Jersey stores?". NJ.com.
- N.J. Democrat: We will reverse smart gun law if NRA plays ball
- Elizabeth Harrington (April 7, 2014). "Holder: We Want to Explore Gun Tracking Bracelets". Washington Free Beaconaccessdate=April 11, 2014.
- European Commission: Firearms and the internal security of the EU: protecting citizens and disrupting illegal trafficking, published October 10, 2013
- Massad Ayoob, "State of the SMART GUN", Guns Magazine[dead link]
- "Selling Safety Priority #1". Shooting Industry. 2000.
- "Magloc Smart Gun Conversion System from SMART LOCK TECHNOLOGY INC". Officer.com. 2007-08-20. Retrieved 2012-08-04.
- Steve Friess (April 14, 2014). "NRA: Smart Guns Are Plain Stupid". Wired.
- "The False Hope of the "Smart" Gun". Vpc.org. 1996-06-12. Retrieved 2012-08-04.
- Party, Boston T. (2000). Boston's Gun Bible. Javelin Press. p. 35. ISBN 978-1-888766-06-6.
- Steinberg Joseph (May 4, 2014). "Forbes: Why You Should Be Concerned About The New 'Smart Guns' (Whether You Love Or Hate Guns)". Forbes.
- "Smart Guns: A Whole New Chapter in Gun Control Debate". Private Eyes Employment Investigators. May 23, 2014
- Long, Duncan (July 20, 2002). "Do You Really Need a Smart Gun?" duncanlong.com
- Rosenwald, Michael S. (May 2, 2014). "Threats against Maryland gun dealer raise doubts about future of smart guns". The Washington Post