Proofs of trigonometric identities are used to show relations between trigonometric functions . This article will list trigonometric identities and prove them.
Elementary trigonometric identities
Definitions
Trigonometric functions specify the relationships between side lengths and interior angles of a right triangle. For example, the sine of angle θ is defined as being the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse.
Referring to the diagram at the right, the six trigonometric functions of θ are:
sin
θ
=
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
=
a
h
{\displaystyle \sin \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {opposite} }{\mathrm {hypotenuse} }}={\frac {a}{h}}}
cos
θ
=
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
=
b
h
{\displaystyle \cos \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {adjacent} }{\mathrm {hypotenuse} }}={\frac {b}{h}}}
tan
θ
=
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
=
a
b
{\displaystyle \tan \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {opposite} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}={\frac {a}{b}}}
cot
θ
=
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
=
b
a
{\displaystyle \cot \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {adjacent} }{\mathrm {opposite} }}={\frac {b}{a}}}
sec
θ
=
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
=
h
b
{\displaystyle \sec \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}={\frac {h}{b}}}
csc
θ
=
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
=
h
a
{\displaystyle \csc \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {opposite} }}={\frac {h}{a}}}
Ratio identities
The following identities are trivial algebraic consequences of these definitions and the division identity.
They rely on multiplying or dividing the numerator and denominator of fractions by a variable. Ie,
a
b
=
(
a
h
)
(
b
h
)
{\displaystyle {\frac {a}{b}}={\frac {\left({\frac {a}{h}}\right)}{\left({\frac {b}{h}}\right)}}}
tan
θ
=
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
=
(
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
)
(
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
)
=
sin
θ
cos
θ
{\displaystyle \tan \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {opposite} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}={\frac {\left({\frac {\mathrm {opposite} }{\mathrm {hypotenuse} }}\right)}{\left({\frac {\mathrm {adjacent} }{\mathrm {hypotenuse} }}\right)}}={\frac {\sin \theta }{\cos \theta }}}
cot
θ
=
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
=
(
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
)
(
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
)
=
1
tan
θ
=
cos
θ
sin
θ
{\displaystyle \cot \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {adjacent} }{\mathrm {opposite} }}={\frac {\left({\frac {\mathrm {adjacent} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}\right)}{\left({\frac {\mathrm {opposite} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}\right)}}={\frac {1}{\tan \theta }}={\frac {\cos \theta }{\sin \theta }}}
sec
θ
=
1
cos
θ
=
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
{\displaystyle \sec \theta ={\frac {1}{\cos \theta }}={\frac {\mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}}
csc
θ
=
1
sin
θ
=
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
{\displaystyle \csc \theta ={\frac {1}{\sin \theta }}={\frac {\mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {opposite} }}}
tan
θ
=
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
=
(
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
×
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
×
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
)
(
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
×
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
×
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
)
=
(
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
)
(
h
y
p
o
t
e
n
u
s
e
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
)
=
sec
θ
csc
θ
{\displaystyle \tan \theta ={\frac {\mathrm {opposite} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}={\frac {\left({\frac {\mathrm {opposite} \times \mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {opposite} \times \mathrm {adjacent} }}\right)}{\left({\frac {\mathrm {adjacent} \times \mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {opposite} \times \mathrm {adjacent} }}\right)}}={\frac {\left({\frac {\mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {adjacent} }}\right)}{\left({\frac {\mathrm {hypotenuse} }{\mathrm {opposite} }}\right)}}={\frac {\sec \theta }{\csc \theta }}}
Or
tan
θ
=
sin
θ
cos
θ
=
(
1
csc
θ
)
(
1
sec
θ
)
=
(
csc
θ
sec
θ
csc
θ
)
(
csc
θ
sec
θ
sec
θ
)
=
sec
θ
csc
θ
{\displaystyle \tan \theta ={\frac {\sin \theta }{\cos \theta }}={\frac {\left({\frac {1}{\csc \theta }}\right)}{\left({\frac {1}{\sec \theta }}\right)}}={\frac {\left({\frac {\csc \theta \sec \theta }{\csc \theta }}\right)}{\left({\frac {\csc \theta \sec \theta }{\sec \theta }}\right)}}={\frac {\sec \theta }{\csc \theta }}}
cot
θ
=
csc
θ
sec
θ
{\displaystyle \cot \theta ={\frac {\csc \theta }{\sec \theta }}}
Complementary angle identities
Two angles whose sum is π/2 radians (90 degrees) are complementary . In the diagram, the angles at vertices A and B are complementary, so we can exchange a and b, and change θ to π/2 − θ, obtaining:
sin
(
π
/
2
−
θ
)
=
cos
θ
{\displaystyle \sin \left(\pi /2-\theta \right)=\cos \theta }
cos
(
π
/
2
−
θ
)
=
sin
θ
{\displaystyle \cos \left(\pi /2-\theta \right)=\sin \theta }
tan
(
π
/
2
−
θ
)
=
cot
θ
{\displaystyle \tan \left(\pi /2-\theta \right)=\cot \theta }
cot
(
π
/
2
−
θ
)
=
tan
θ
{\displaystyle \cot \left(\pi /2-\theta \right)=\tan \theta }
sec
(
π
/
2
−
θ
)
=
csc
θ
{\displaystyle \sec \left(\pi /2-\theta \right)=\csc \theta }
csc
(
π
/
2
−
θ
)
=
sec
θ
{\displaystyle \csc \left(\pi /2-\theta \right)=\sec \theta }
Pythagorean identities
Identity 1:
sin
2
(
x
)
+
cos
2
(
x
)
=
1
{\displaystyle \sin ^{2}(x)+\cos ^{2}(x)=1\,}
The following two results follow from this and the ratio identities. To obtain the first, divide both sides of
sin
2
(
x
)
+
cos
2
(
x
)
=
1
{\displaystyle \sin ^{2}(x)+\cos ^{2}(x)=1}
by
cos
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \cos ^{2}(x)}
; for the second, divide by
sin
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \sin ^{2}(x)}
.
tan
2
(
x
)
+
1
=
sec
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \tan ^{2}(x)+1\ =\sec ^{2}(x)}
1
+
cot
2
(
x
)
=
csc
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle 1\ +\cot ^{2}(x)=\csc ^{2}(x)}
Similarly
1
+
cot
2
(
x
)
=
csc
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle 1\ +\cot ^{2}(x)=\csc ^{2}(x)}
csc
2
(
x
)
−
cot
2
(
x
)
=
1
{\displaystyle \csc ^{2}(x)-\cot ^{2}(x)=1\ }
Identity 2:
The following accounts for all three reciprocal functions.
csc
2
(
x
)
+
sec
2
(
x
)
−
cot
2
(
x
)
=
2
+
tan
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \csc ^{2}(x)+\sec ^{2}(x)-\cot ^{2}(x)=2\ +\tan ^{2}(x)}
Proof 2:
Refer to the triangle diagram above. Note that
a
2
+
b
2
=
h
2
{\displaystyle a^{2}+b^{2}=h^{2}}
by Pythagorean theorem .
csc
2
(
x
)
+
sec
2
(
x
)
=
h
2
a
2
+
h
2
b
2
=
a
2
+
b
2
a
2
+
a
2
+
b
2
b
2
=
2
+
b
2
a
2
+
a
2
b
2
{\displaystyle \csc ^{2}(x)+\sec ^{2}(x)={\frac {h^{2}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {h^{2}}{b^{2}}}={\frac {a^{2}+b^{2}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {a^{2}+b^{2}}{b^{2}}}=2\ +{\frac {b^{2}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {a^{2}}{b^{2}}}}
Substituting with appropriate functions -
2
+
b
2
a
2
+
a
2
b
2
=
2
+
tan
2
(
x
)
+
cot
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle 2\ +{\frac {b^{2}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {a^{2}}{b^{2}}}=2\ +\tan ^{2}(x)+\cot ^{2}(x)}
Rearranging gives:
csc
2
(
x
)
+
sec
2
(
x
)
−
cot
2
(
x
)
=
2
+
tan
2
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \csc ^{2}(x)+\sec ^{2}(x)-\cot ^{2}(x)=2\ +\tan ^{2}(x)}
Angle sum identities
Sine
Illustration of the sum formula.
Draw a horizontal line (the x -axis); mark an origin O. Draw a line from O at an angle
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
above the horizontal line and a second line at an angle
β
{\displaystyle \beta }
above that; the angle between the second line and the x -axis is
α
+
β
{\displaystyle \alpha +\beta }
.
Place P on the line defined by
α
+
β
{\displaystyle \alpha +\beta }
at a unit distance from the origin.
Let PQ be a line perpendicular to line defined by angle
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
, drawn from point Q on this line to point P.
∴
{\displaystyle \therefore }
OQP is a right angle.
Let QA be a perpendicular from point A on the x -axis to Q and PB be a perpendicular from point B on the x -axis to P.
∴
{\displaystyle \therefore }
OAQ and OBP are right angles.
Draw R on PB so that QR is parallel to the x -axis.
Now angle
R
P
Q
=
α
{\displaystyle RPQ=\alpha }
(because
O
Q
A
=
90
−
α
{\displaystyle OQA=90-\alpha }
,
making
R
Q
O
=
α
,
R
Q
P
=
90
−
α
{\displaystyle RQO=\alpha ,RQP=90-\alpha }
, and finally
R
P
Q
=
α
{\displaystyle RPQ=\alpha }
)
R
P
Q
=
π
2
−
R
Q
P
=
π
2
−
(
π
2
−
R
Q
O
)
=
R
Q
O
=
α
{\displaystyle RPQ={\tfrac {\pi }{2}}-RQP={\tfrac {\pi }{2}}-({\tfrac {\pi }{2}}-RQO)=RQO=\alpha }
O
P
=
1
{\displaystyle OP=1}
P
Q
=
sin
β
{\displaystyle PQ=\sin \beta }
O
Q
=
cos
β
{\displaystyle OQ=\cos \beta }
A
Q
O
Q
=
sin
α
{\displaystyle {\frac {AQ}{OQ}}=\sin \alpha \,}
, so
A
Q
=
sin
α
cos
β
{\displaystyle AQ=\sin \alpha \cos \beta }
P
R
P
Q
=
cos
α
{\displaystyle {\frac {PR}{PQ}}=\cos \alpha \,}
, so
P
R
=
cos
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle PR=\cos \alpha \sin \beta }
sin
(
α
+
β
)
=
P
B
=
R
B
+
P
R
=
A
Q
+
P
R
=
sin
α
cos
β
+
cos
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha +\beta )=PB=RB+PR=AQ+PR=\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\cos \alpha \sin \beta }
By substituting
−
β
{\displaystyle -\beta }
for
β
{\displaystyle \beta }
and using Symmetry , we also get:
sin
(
α
−
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
(
−
β
)
+
cos
α
sin
(
−
β
)
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha -\beta )=\sin \alpha \cos(-\beta )+\cos \alpha \sin(-\beta )}
sin
(
α
−
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
β
−
cos
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha -\beta )=\sin \alpha \cos \beta -\cos \alpha \sin \beta }
Another rigorous proof, and much easier, can be given by using Euler's formula, known from complex analysis.
Euler's formula is:
e
i
φ
=
cos
φ
+
i
sin
φ
{\displaystyle e^{i\varphi }=\cos \varphi +i\sin \varphi }
It follows that for angles
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
and
β
{\displaystyle \beta }
we have:
e
i
(
α
+
β
)
=
cos
(
α
+
β
)
+
i
sin
(
α
+
β
)
{\displaystyle e^{i(\alpha +\beta )}=\cos(\alpha +\beta )+i\sin(\alpha +\beta )}
Also using the following properties of exponential functions:
e
i
(
α
+
β
)
=
e
i
α
e
i
β
=
(
cos
α
+
i
sin
α
)
(
cos
β
+
i
sin
β
)
{\displaystyle e^{i(\alpha +\beta )}=e^{i\alpha }e^{i\beta }=(\cos \alpha +i\sin \alpha )(\cos \beta +i\sin \beta )}
Evaluating the product:
e
i
(
α
+
β
)
=
(
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
)
+
i
(
sin
α
cos
β
+
sin
β
cos
α
)
{\displaystyle e^{i(\alpha +\beta )}=(\cos \alpha \cos \beta -\sin \alpha \sin \beta )+i(\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\sin \beta \cos \alpha )}
Equating real and imaginary parts:
cos
(
α
+
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha +\beta )=\cos \alpha \cos \beta -\sin \alpha \sin \beta }
sin
(
α
+
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
β
+
sin
β
cos
α
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha +\beta )=\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\sin \beta \cos \alpha }
Cosine
Using the figure above,
O
P
=
1
{\displaystyle OP=1\,}
P
Q
=
sin
β
{\displaystyle PQ=\sin \beta \,}
O
Q
=
cos
β
{\displaystyle OQ=\cos \beta \,}
O
A
O
Q
=
cos
α
{\displaystyle {\frac {OA}{OQ}}=\cos \alpha \,}
, so
O
A
=
cos
α
cos
β
{\displaystyle OA=\cos \alpha \cos \beta \,}
R
Q
P
Q
=
sin
α
{\displaystyle {\frac {RQ}{PQ}}=\sin \alpha \,}
, so
R
Q
=
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle RQ=\sin \alpha \sin \beta \,}
cos
(
α
+
β
)
=
O
B
=
O
A
−
B
A
=
O
A
−
R
Q
=
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha +\beta )=OB=OA-BA=OA-RQ=\cos \alpha \cos \beta \ -\sin \alpha \sin \beta \,}
By substituting
−
β
{\displaystyle -\beta }
for
β
{\displaystyle \beta }
and using Symmetry , we also get:
cos
(
α
−
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
(
−
β
)
−
sin
α
sin
(
−
β
)
,
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha -\beta )=\cos \alpha \cos(-\beta )-\sin \alpha \sin(-\beta ),}
cos
(
α
−
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
β
+
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha -\beta )=\cos \alpha \cos \beta +\sin \alpha \sin \beta \,}
Also, using the complementary angle formulae,
cos
(
α
+
β
)
=
sin
(
π
/
2
−
(
α
+
β
)
)
=
sin
(
(
π
/
2
−
α
)
−
β
)
=
sin
(
π
/
2
−
α
)
cos
β
−
cos
(
π
/
2
−
α
)
sin
β
=
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\cos(\alpha +\beta )&=\sin \left(\pi /2-(\alpha +\beta )\right)\\&=\sin \left((\pi /2-\alpha )-\beta \right)\\&=\sin \left(\pi /2-\alpha \right)\cos \beta -\cos \left(\pi /2-\alpha \right)\sin \beta \\&=\cos \alpha \cos \beta -\sin \alpha \sin \beta \\\end{aligned}}}
Tangent and cotangent
From the sine and cosine formulae, we get
tan
(
α
+
β
)
=
sin
(
α
+
β
)
cos
(
α
+
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
β
+
cos
α
sin
β
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \tan(\alpha +\beta )={\frac {\sin(\alpha +\beta )}{\cos(\alpha +\beta )}}={\frac {\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\cos \alpha \sin \beta }{\cos \alpha \cos \beta -\sin \alpha \sin \beta }}}
Dividing both numerator and denominator by
cos
α
cos
β
{\displaystyle \cos \alpha \cos \beta }
, we get
tan
(
α
+
β
)
=
tan
α
+
tan
β
1
−
tan
α
tan
β
{\displaystyle \tan(\alpha +\beta )={\frac {\tan \alpha +\tan \beta }{1-\tan \alpha \tan \beta }}}
Subtracting
β
{\displaystyle \beta }
from
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
, using
tan
(
−
β
)
=
−
tan
β
{\displaystyle \tan(-\beta )=-\tan \beta }
,
tan
(
α
−
β
)
=
tan
α
+
tan
(
−
β
)
1
−
tan
α
tan
(
−
β
)
=
tan
α
−
tan
β
1
+
tan
α
tan
β
{\displaystyle \tan(\alpha -\beta )={\frac {\tan \alpha +\tan(-\beta )}{1-\tan \alpha \tan(-\beta )}}={\frac {\tan \alpha -\tan \beta }{1+\tan \alpha \tan \beta }}}
Similarly from the sine and cosine formulae, we get
cot
(
α
+
β
)
=
cos
(
α
+
β
)
sin
(
α
+
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
sin
α
cos
β
+
cos
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \cot(\alpha +\beta )={\frac {\cos(\alpha +\beta )}{\sin(\alpha +\beta )}}={\frac {\cos \alpha \cos \beta -\sin \alpha \sin \beta }{\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\cos \alpha \sin \beta }}}
Then by dividing both numerator and denominator by
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \sin \alpha \sin \beta }
, we get
cot
(
α
+
β
)
=
cot
α
cot
β
−
1
cot
α
+
cot
β
{\displaystyle \cot(\alpha +\beta )={\frac {\cot \alpha \cot \beta -1}{\cot \alpha +\cot \beta }}}
Or, using
cot
θ
=
1
tan
θ
{\displaystyle \cot \theta ={\frac {1}{\tan \theta }}}
,
cot
(
α
+
β
)
=
1
−
tan
α
tan
β
tan
α
+
tan
β
=
1
tan
α
tan
β
−
1
1
tan
α
+
1
tan
β
=
cot
α
cot
β
−
1
cot
α
+
cot
β
{\displaystyle \cot(\alpha +\beta )={\frac {1-\tan \alpha \tan \beta }{\tan \alpha +\tan \beta }}={\frac {{\frac {1}{\tan \alpha \tan \beta }}-1}{{\frac {1}{\tan \alpha }}+{\frac {1}{\tan \beta }}}}={\frac {\cot \alpha \cot \beta -1}{\cot \alpha +\cot \beta }}}
Using
cot
(
−
β
)
=
−
cot
β
{\displaystyle \cot(-\beta )=-\cot \beta }
,
cot
(
α
−
β
)
=
cot
α
cot
(
−
β
)
−
1
cot
α
+
cot
(
−
β
)
=
cot
α
cot
β
+
1
cot
β
−
cot
α
{\displaystyle \cot(\alpha -\beta )={\frac {\cot \alpha \cot(-\beta )-1}{\cot \alpha +\cot(-\beta )}}={\frac {\cot \alpha \cot \beta +1}{\cot \beta -\cot \alpha }}}
Double-angle identities
From the angle sum identities, we get
sin
(
2
θ
)
=
2
sin
θ
cos
θ
{\displaystyle \sin(2\theta )=2\sin \theta \cos \theta \,}
and
cos
(
2
θ
)
=
cos
2
θ
−
sin
2
θ
{\displaystyle \cos(2\theta )=\cos ^{2}\theta -\sin ^{2}\theta \,}
The Pythagorean identities give the two alternative forms for the latter of these:
cos
(
2
θ
)
=
2
cos
2
θ
−
1
{\displaystyle \cos(2\theta )=2\cos ^{2}\theta -1\,}
cos
(
2
θ
)
=
1
−
2
sin
2
θ
{\displaystyle \cos(2\theta )=1-2\sin ^{2}\theta \,}
The angle sum identities also give
tan
(
2
θ
)
=
2
tan
θ
1
−
tan
2
θ
=
2
cot
θ
−
tan
θ
{\displaystyle \tan(2\theta )={\frac {2\tan \theta }{1-\tan ^{2}\theta }}={\frac {2}{\cot \theta -\tan \theta }}\,}
cot
(
2
θ
)
=
cot
2
θ
−
1
2
cot
θ
=
cot
θ
−
tan
θ
2
{\displaystyle \cot(2\theta )={\frac {\cot ^{2}\theta -1}{2\cot \theta }}={\frac {\cot \theta -\tan \theta }{2}}\,}
It can also be proved using Euler's formula
e
i
φ
=
cos
φ
+
i
sin
φ
{\displaystyle e^{i\varphi }=\cos \varphi +i\sin \varphi }
Squaring both sides yields
e
i
2
φ
=
(
cos
φ
+
i
sin
φ
)
2
{\displaystyle e^{i2\varphi }=(\cos \varphi +i\sin \varphi )^{2}}
But replacing the angle with its doubled version, which achieves the same result in the left side of the equation, yields
e
i
2
φ
=
cos
2
φ
+
i
sin
2
φ
{\displaystyle e^{i2\varphi }=\cos 2\varphi +i\sin 2\varphi }
It follows that
(
cos
φ
+
i
sin
φ
)
2
=
cos
2
φ
+
i
sin
2
φ
{\displaystyle (\cos \varphi +i\sin \varphi )^{2}=\cos 2\varphi +i\sin 2\varphi }
.
Expanding the square and simplifying on the left hand side of the equation gives
i
(
2
sin
φ
cos
φ
)
+
cos
2
φ
−
sin
2
φ
=
cos
2
φ
+
i
sin
2
φ
{\displaystyle i(2\sin \varphi \cos \varphi )+\cos ^{2}\varphi -\sin ^{2}\varphi \ =\cos 2\varphi +i\sin 2\varphi }
.
Because the imaginary and real parts have to be the same, we are left with the original identities
cos
2
φ
−
sin
2
φ
=
cos
2
φ
{\displaystyle \cos ^{2}\varphi -\sin ^{2}\varphi \ =\cos 2\varphi }
,
and also
2
sin
φ
cos
φ
=
sin
2
φ
{\displaystyle 2\sin \varphi \cos \varphi =\sin 2\varphi }
.
Half-angle identities
The two identities giving the alternative forms for cos 2θ lead to the following equations:
cos
θ
2
=
±
1
+
cos
θ
2
,
{\displaystyle \cos {\frac {\theta }{2}}=\pm \,{\sqrt {\frac {1+\cos \theta }{2}}},\,}
sin
θ
2
=
±
1
−
cos
θ
2
.
{\displaystyle \sin {\frac {\theta }{2}}=\pm \,{\sqrt {\frac {1-\cos \theta }{2}}}.\,}
The sign of the square root needs to be chosen properly—note that if π is added to θ, the quantities inside the square roots are unchanged, but the left-hand-sides of the equations change sign. Therefore, the correct sign to use depends on the value of θ.
For the tan function, the equation is:
tan
θ
2
=
±
1
−
cos
θ
1
+
cos
θ
.
{\displaystyle \tan {\frac {\theta }{2}}=\pm \,{\sqrt {\frac {1-\cos \theta }{1+\cos \theta }}}.\,}
Then multiplying the numerator and denominator inside the square root by (1 + cos θ) and using Pythagorean identities leads to:
tan
θ
2
=
sin
θ
1
+
cos
θ
.
{\displaystyle \tan {\frac {\theta }{2}}={\frac {\sin \theta }{1+\cos \theta }}.\,}
Also, if the numerator and denominator are both multiplied by (1 - cos θ), the result is:
tan
θ
2
=
1
−
cos
θ
sin
θ
.
{\displaystyle \tan {\frac {\theta }{2}}={\frac {1-\cos \theta }{\sin \theta }}.\,}
This also gives:
tan
θ
2
=
csc
θ
−
cot
θ
.
{\displaystyle \tan {\frac {\theta }{2}}=\csc \theta -\cot \theta .\,}
Similar manipulations for the cot function give:
cot
θ
2
=
±
1
+
cos
θ
1
−
cos
θ
=
1
+
cos
θ
sin
θ
=
sin
θ
1
−
cos
θ
=
csc
θ
+
cot
θ
.
{\displaystyle \cot {\frac {\theta }{2}}=\pm \,{\sqrt {\frac {1+\cos \theta }{1-\cos \theta }}}={\frac {1+\cos \theta }{\sin \theta }}={\frac {\sin \theta }{1-\cos \theta }}=\csc \theta +\cot \theta .\,}
Miscellaneous -- the triple tangent identity
If
ψ
+
θ
+
ϕ
=
π
=
{\displaystyle \psi +\theta +\phi =\pi =}
half circle (for example,
ψ
{\displaystyle \psi }
,
θ
{\displaystyle \theta }
and
ϕ
{\displaystyle \phi }
are the angles of a triangle),
tan
(
ψ
)
+
tan
(
θ
)
+
tan
(
ϕ
)
=
tan
(
ψ
)
tan
(
θ
)
tan
(
ϕ
)
.
{\displaystyle \tan(\psi )+\tan(\theta )+\tan(\phi )=\tan(\psi )\tan(\theta )\tan(\phi ).}
Proof:[ 1]
ψ
=
π
−
θ
−
ϕ
tan
(
ψ
)
=
tan
(
π
−
θ
−
ϕ
)
=
−
tan
(
θ
+
ϕ
)
=
−
tan
θ
−
tan
ϕ
1
−
tan
θ
tan
ϕ
=
tan
θ
+
tan
ϕ
tan
θ
tan
ϕ
−
1
(
tan
θ
tan
ϕ
−
1
)
tan
ψ
=
tan
θ
+
tan
ϕ
tan
ψ
tan
θ
tan
ϕ
−
tan
ψ
=
tan
θ
+
tan
ϕ
tan
ψ
tan
θ
tan
ϕ
=
tan
ψ
+
tan
θ
+
tan
ϕ
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\psi &=\pi -\theta -\phi \\\tan(\psi )&=\tan(\pi -\theta -\phi )\\&=-\tan(\theta +\phi )\\&={\frac {-\tan \theta -\tan \phi }{1-\tan \theta \tan \phi }}\\&={\frac {\tan \theta +\tan \phi }{\tan \theta \tan \phi -1}}\\(\tan \theta \tan \phi -1)\tan \psi &=\tan \theta +\tan \phi \\\tan \psi \tan \theta \tan \phi -\tan \psi &=\tan \theta +\tan \phi \\\tan \psi \tan \theta \tan \phi &=\tan \psi +\tan \theta +\tan \phi \\\end{aligned}}}
Miscellaneous -- the triple cotangent identity
If
ψ
+
θ
+
ϕ
=
π
2
=
{\displaystyle \psi +\theta +\phi ={\tfrac {\pi }{2}}=}
quarter circle,
cot
(
ψ
)
+
cot
(
θ
)
+
cot
(
ϕ
)
=
cot
(
ψ
)
cot
(
θ
)
cot
(
ϕ
)
{\displaystyle \cot(\psi )+\cot(\theta )+\cot(\phi )=\cot(\psi )\cot(\theta )\cot(\phi )}
.
Proof:
Replace each of
ψ
{\displaystyle \psi }
,
θ
{\displaystyle \theta }
, and
ϕ
{\displaystyle \phi }
with their complementary angles, so cotangents turn into tangents and vice versa.
Given
ψ
+
θ
+
ϕ
=
π
2
{\displaystyle \psi +\theta +\phi ={\tfrac {\pi }{2}}\,}
∴
(
π
2
−
ψ
)
+
(
π
2
−
θ
)
+
(
π
2
−
ϕ
)
=
3
π
2
−
(
ψ
+
θ
+
ϕ
)
=
3
π
2
−
π
2
=
π
{\displaystyle \therefore ({\tfrac {\pi }{2}}-\psi )+({\tfrac {\pi }{2}}-\theta )+({\tfrac {\pi }{2}}-\phi )={\tfrac {3\pi }{2}}-(\psi +\theta +\phi )={\tfrac {3\pi }{2}}-{\tfrac {\pi }{2}}=\pi }
so the result follows from the triple tangent identity.
Prosthaphaeresis identities
sin
θ
±
sin
ϕ
=
2
sin
(
θ
±
ϕ
2
)
cos
(
θ
∓
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \sin \theta \pm \sin \phi =2\sin \left({\frac {\theta \pm \phi }{2}}\right)\cos \left({\frac {\theta \mp \phi }{2}}\right)}
cos
θ
+
cos
ϕ
=
2
cos
(
θ
+
ϕ
2
)
cos
(
θ
−
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \cos \theta +\cos \phi =2\cos \left({\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}\right)\cos \left({\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}\right)}
cos
θ
−
cos
ϕ
=
−
2
sin
(
θ
+
ϕ
2
)
sin
(
θ
−
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \cos \theta -\cos \phi =-2\sin \left({\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}\right)\sin \left({\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}\right)}
Proof of sine identities
First, start with the sum-angle identities:
sin
(
α
+
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
β
+
cos
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha +\beta )=\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\cos \alpha \sin \beta }
sin
(
α
−
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
β
−
cos
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha -\beta )=\sin \alpha \cos \beta -\cos \alpha \sin \beta }
By adding these together,
sin
(
α
+
β
)
+
sin
(
α
−
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
β
+
cos
α
sin
β
+
sin
α
cos
β
−
cos
α
sin
β
=
2
sin
α
cos
β
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha +\beta )+\sin(\alpha -\beta )=\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\cos \alpha \sin \beta +\sin \alpha \cos \beta -\cos \alpha \sin \beta =2\sin \alpha \cos \beta }
Similarly, by subtracting the two sum-angle identities,
sin
(
α
+
β
)
−
sin
(
α
−
β
)
=
sin
α
cos
β
+
cos
α
sin
β
−
sin
α
cos
β
+
cos
α
sin
β
=
2
cos
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \sin(\alpha +\beta )-\sin(\alpha -\beta )=\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\cos \alpha \sin \beta -\sin \alpha \cos \beta +\cos \alpha \sin \beta =2\cos \alpha \sin \beta }
Let
α
+
β
=
θ
{\displaystyle \alpha +\beta =\theta }
and
α
−
β
=
ϕ
{\displaystyle \alpha -\beta =\phi }
,
∴
α
=
θ
+
ϕ
2
{\displaystyle \therefore \alpha ={\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}}
and
β
=
θ
−
ϕ
2
{\displaystyle \beta ={\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}}
Substitute
θ
{\displaystyle \theta }
and
ϕ
{\displaystyle \phi }
sin
θ
+
sin
ϕ
=
2
sin
(
θ
+
ϕ
2
)
cos
(
θ
−
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \sin \theta +\sin \phi =2\sin \left({\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}\right)\cos \left({\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}\right)}
sin
θ
−
sin
ϕ
=
2
cos
(
θ
+
ϕ
2
)
sin
(
θ
−
ϕ
2
)
=
2
sin
(
θ
−
ϕ
2
)
cos
(
θ
+
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \sin \theta -\sin \phi =2\cos \left({\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}\right)\sin \left({\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}\right)=2\sin \left({\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}\right)\cos \left({\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}\right)}
Therefore,
sin
θ
±
sin
ϕ
=
2
sin
(
θ
±
ϕ
2
)
cos
(
θ
∓
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \sin \theta \pm \sin \phi =2\sin \left({\frac {\theta \pm \phi }{2}}\right)\cos \left({\frac {\theta \mp \phi }{2}}\right)}
Proof of cosine identities
Similarly for cosine, start with the sum-angle identities:
cos
(
α
+
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha +\beta )=\cos \alpha \cos \beta \ -\sin \alpha \sin \beta }
cos
(
α
−
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
β
+
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha -\beta )=\cos \alpha \cos \beta +\sin \alpha \sin \beta }
Again, by adding and subtracting
cos
(
α
+
β
)
+
cos
(
α
−
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
+
cos
α
cos
β
+
sin
α
sin
β
=
2
cos
α
cos
β
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha +\beta )+\cos(\alpha -\beta )=\cos \alpha \cos \beta \ -\sin \alpha \sin \beta +\cos \alpha \cos \beta +\sin \alpha \sin \beta =2\cos \alpha \cos \beta \ }
cos
(
α
+
β
)
−
cos
(
α
−
β
)
=
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
−
cos
α
cos
β
−
sin
α
sin
β
=
−
2
sin
α
sin
β
{\displaystyle \cos(\alpha +\beta )-\cos(\alpha -\beta )=\cos \alpha \cos \beta \ -\sin \alpha \sin \beta -\cos \alpha \cos \beta -\sin \alpha \sin \beta =-2\sin \alpha \sin \beta }
Substitute
θ
{\displaystyle \theta }
and
ϕ
{\displaystyle \phi }
as before,
cos
θ
+
cos
ϕ
=
2
cos
(
θ
+
ϕ
2
)
cos
(
θ
−
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \cos \theta +\cos \phi =2\cos \left({\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}\right)\cos \left({\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}\right)}
cos
θ
−
cos
ϕ
=
−
2
sin
(
θ
+
ϕ
2
)
sin
(
θ
−
ϕ
2
)
{\displaystyle \cos \theta -\cos \phi =-2\sin \left({\frac {\theta +\phi }{2}}\right)\sin \left({\frac {\theta -\phi }{2}}\right)}
Inequalities
Illustration of the sine and tangent inequalities.
The figure at the right shows a sector of a circle with radius 1. The sector is θ/(2π) of the whole circle, so its area is θ/2.
O
A
=
O
D
=
1
{\displaystyle OA=OD=1\,}
A
B
=
sin
θ
{\displaystyle AB=\sin \theta \,}
C
D
=
tan
θ
{\displaystyle CD=\tan \theta \,}
The area of triangle OAD is AB/2, or sinθ/2. The area of triangle OCD is CD/2, or tanθ/2.
Since triangle OAD lies completely inside the sector, which in turn lies completely inside triangle OCD, we have
sin
θ
<
θ
<
tan
θ
{\displaystyle \sin \theta <\theta <\tan \theta \,}
This geometric argument applies if 0<θ<π/2. It relies on definitions of arc length and
area , which act as assumptions, so it is rather a condition imposed in construction of trigonometric functions than
a provable property.[ 2] For the sine function, we can handle other values. If θ>π/2, then θ>1. But sinθ≤1 (because of the Pythagorean identity), so sinθ<θ. So we have
sin
θ
θ
<
1
i
f
0
<
θ
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}<1\ \ \ \mathrm {if} \ \ \ 0<\theta \,}
For negative values of θ we have, by symmetry of the sine function
sin
θ
θ
=
sin
(
−
θ
)
−
θ
<
1
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}={\frac {\sin(-\theta )}{-\theta }}<1\,}
Hence
sin
θ
θ
<
1
i
f
θ
≠
0
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}<1\ \ \ \mathrm {if} \ \ \ \theta \neq 0\,}
tan
θ
θ
>
1
i
f
0
<
θ
<
π
2
{\displaystyle {\frac {\tan \theta }{\theta }}>1\ \ \ \mathrm {if} \ \ \ 0<\theta <{\frac {\pi }{2}}\,}
Identities involving calculus
Preliminaries
lim
θ
→
0
sin
θ
=
0
{\displaystyle \lim _{\theta \to 0}{\sin \theta }=0\,}
lim
θ
→
0
cos
θ
=
1
{\displaystyle \lim _{\theta \to 0}{\cos \theta }=1\,}
Sine and angle ratio identity
lim
θ
→
0
sin
θ
θ
=
1
{\displaystyle \lim _{\theta \to 0}{\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}=1}
Proof: From the previous inequalities, we have, for small angles
sin
θ
<
θ
<
tan
θ
{\displaystyle \sin \theta <\theta <\tan \theta \,}
,
Therefore,
sin
θ
θ
<
1
<
tan
θ
θ
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}<1<{\frac {\tan \theta }{\theta }}\,}
,
Consider the right-hand inequality. Since
tan
θ
=
sin
θ
cos
θ
{\displaystyle \tan \theta ={\frac {\sin \theta }{\cos \theta }}}
∴
1
<
sin
θ
θ
cos
θ
{\displaystyle \therefore 1<{\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta \cos \theta }}}
Multiply through by
cos
θ
{\displaystyle \cos \theta }
cos
θ
<
sin
θ
θ
{\displaystyle \cos \theta <{\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}}
Combining with the left-hand inequality:
cos
θ
<
sin
θ
θ
<
1
{\displaystyle \cos \theta <{\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}<1}
Taking
cos
θ
{\displaystyle \cos \theta }
to the limit as
θ
→
0
{\displaystyle \theta \to 0}
lim
θ
→
0
cos
θ
=
1
{\displaystyle \lim _{\theta \to 0}{\cos \theta }=1\,}
Therefore,
lim
θ
→
0
sin
θ
θ
=
1
{\displaystyle \lim _{\theta \to 0}{\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}=1}
Cosine and angle ratio identity
lim
θ
→
0
1
−
cos
θ
θ
=
0
{\displaystyle \lim _{\theta \to 0}{\frac {1-\cos \theta }{\theta }}=0}
Proof:
1
−
cos
θ
θ
=
1
−
cos
2
θ
θ
(
1
+
cos
θ
)
=
sin
2
θ
θ
(
1
+
cos
θ
)
=
(
sin
θ
θ
)
×
sin
θ
×
(
1
1
+
cos
θ
)
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {1-\cos \theta }{\theta }}&={\frac {1-\cos ^{2}\theta }{\theta (1+\cos \theta )}}\\&={\frac {\sin ^{2}\theta }{\theta (1+\cos \theta )}}\\&=\left({\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}\right)\times \sin \theta \times \left({\frac {1}{1+\cos \theta }}\right)\\\end{aligned}}}
The limits of those three quantities are 1, 0, and 1/2, so the resultant limit is zero.
Cosine and square of angle ratio identity
lim
θ
→
0
1
−
cos
θ
θ
2
=
1
2
{\displaystyle \lim _{\theta \to 0}{\frac {1-\cos \theta }{\theta ^{2}}}={\frac {1}{2}}}
Proof:
As in the preceding proof,
1
−
cos
θ
θ
2
=
sin
θ
θ
×
sin
θ
θ
×
1
1
+
cos
θ
.
{\displaystyle {\frac {1-\cos \theta }{\theta ^{2}}}={\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}\times {\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta }}\times {\frac {1}{1+\cos \theta }}.\,}
The limits of those three quantities are 1, 1, and 1/2, so the resultant limit is 1/2.
Proof of Compositions of trig and inverse trig functions
All these functions follow from the Pythagorean trigonometric identity. We can prove for instance the function
sin
[
arctan
(
x
)
]
=
x
1
+
x
2
{\displaystyle \sin[\arctan(x)]={\frac {x}{\sqrt {1+x^{2}}}}}
Proof:
We start from
sin
2
θ
+
cos
2
θ
=
1
{\displaystyle \sin ^{2}\theta +\cos ^{2}\theta =1}
Then we divide this equation by
cos
2
θ
{\displaystyle \cos ^{2}\theta }
cos
2
θ
=
1
tan
2
θ
+
1
{\displaystyle \cos ^{2}\theta ={\frac {1}{\tan ^{2}\theta +1}}}
Then use the substitution
θ
=
arctan
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \theta =\arctan(x)}
, also use the Pythagorean trigonometric identity:
1
−
sin
2
[
arctan
(
x
)
]
=
1
tan
2
[
arctan
(
x
)
]
+
1
{\displaystyle 1-\sin ^{2}[\arctan(x)]={\frac {1}{\tan ^{2}[\arctan(x)]+1}}}
Then we use the identity
tan
[
arctan
(
x
)
]
≡
x
{\displaystyle \tan[\arctan(x)]\equiv x}
sin
[
arctan
(
x
)
]
=
x
x
2
+
1
{\displaystyle \sin[\arctan(x)]={\frac {x}{\sqrt {x^{2}+1}}}}
See also
Notes
References
E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson. A course of modern analysis , Cambridge University Press, 1952