Quantum walk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quantum walks are quantum analogues of classical random walks. In contrast to the classical random walk, where the walker occupies definite states and the randomness arises due to stochastic transitions between states, in quantum walks randomness arises through: (1) quantum superposition of states, (2) non-random, reversible unitary evolution and (3) collapse of the wave function due to state measurements.

As with classical random walks, quantum walks admit formulations in both discrete time and continuous time.


Quantum walks are motivated by the widespread use of classical random walks in the design of randomized algorithms, and are part of several quantum algorithms. For some oracular problems, quantum walks provide an exponential speedup over any classical algorithm.[1][2] Quantum walks also give polynomial speedups over classical algorithms for many practical problems, such as the element distinctness problem,[3] the triangle finding problem,[4] and evaluating NAND trees.[5] The well-known Grover search algorithm can also be viewed as a quantum walk algorithm.

Relation to classical random walks[edit]

Quantum walks exhibit very different features from classical random walks. In particular, they do not converge to limiting distributions and due to the power of quantum interference they may spread significantly faster or slower than their classical equivalents.

Continuous time[edit]

Continuous-time quantum walks arise when one replaces the continuum spatial domain in the Schrödinger equation with a discrete set. That is, instead of having a quantum particle propagate in a continuum, one restricts the set of possible position states to the vertex set of some graph which can be either finite or countably infinite. Under particular conditions, continuous-time quantum walks can provide a model for universal quantum computation.[6]

Relation to non-relativistic Schrödinger dynamics[edit]

Consider the dynamics of a non-relativistic, spin-less free quantum particle with mass propagating on an infinite one-dimensional spatial domain. The particle's motion is completely described by its wave function which satisfies the one-dimensional, free particle Schrödinger equation

where and is the reduced Planck's constant. Now suppose that only the spatial part of the domain is discretized, being replaced with where is the separation between the spatial sites the particle can occupy. The wave function becomes the map and the second spatial partial derivative becomes the discrete laplacian

The evolution equation for a continuous time quantum walk on is thus

where is a characteristic frequency. This construction naturally generalizes to the case that the discretized spatial domain is an arbitrary graph and the discrete laplacian is replaced by the graph Laplacian where and are the degree matrix and the adjacency matrix, respectively. Common choices of graphs that show up in the study of continuous time quantum walks are the d-dimensional lattices , cycle graphs , d-dimensional discrete tori , the d-dimensional hypercube and random graphs.

Discrete time[edit]

Discrete-time quantum walks on [edit]

Probability distribution resulting from one-dimensional discrete time random walks. The quantum walk created using the Hadamard coin is plotted (orange) vs a classical walk (blue) after 50 time steps.

The evolution of a quantum walk in discrete time is specified by the product of two unitary operators: (1) a "coin flip" operator and (2) a conditional shift operator, which are applied repeatedly. The following example is instructive here.[7] Imagine a particle with a spin-1/2-degree of freedom propagating on a linear array of discrete sites. If the number of such sites is countably infinite, we identify the state space with . The particle's state can then be described by a product state

consisting of an internal spin state

and a position state

where is the "coin space" and is the space of physical quantum position states. The product in this setting is the Kronecker (tensor) product. The conditional shift operator for the quantum walk on the line is given by

i.e. the particle jumps right if it has spin up and left if it has spin down. Explicitly, the conditional shift operator acts on product states according to

If we first rotate the spin with some unitary transformation and then apply , we get a non-trivial quantum motion on . A popular choice for such a transformation is the Hadamard gate , which, with respect to the standard z-component spin basis, has matrix representation

When this choice is made for the coin flip operator, the operator itself is called the "Hadamard coin" and the resulting quantum walk is called the "Hadamard walk". If the walker is initialized at the origin and in the spin-up state, a single time step of the Hadamard walk on is

Measurement of the system's state at this point would reveal an up spin at position 1 or a down spin at position −1, both with probability 1/2. Repeating the procedure would correspond to a classical simple random walk on . In order to observe non-classical motion, no measurement is performed on the state at this point (and therefore do not force a collapse of the wave function). Instead, repeat the procedure of rotating the spin with the coin flip operator and conditionally jumping with . This way, quantum correlations are preserved and different position states can interfere with one another. This gives a drastically different probability distribution than the classical random walk (Gaussian distribution) as seen in the figure to the right. Spatially one sees that the distribution is not symmetric: even though the Hadamard coin gives both up and down spin with equal probability, the distribution tends to drift to the right when the initial spin is . This asymmetry is entirely due to the fact that the Hadamard coin treats the and state asymmetrically. A symmetric probability distribution arises if the initial state is chosen to be

Dirac equation[edit]

Consider what happens when we discretize a massive Dirac operator over one spatial dimension. In the absence of a mass term, we have left-movers and right-movers.[clarification needed] They can be characterized by an internal degree of freedom, "spin" or a "coin". When we turn on a mass term, this corresponds to a rotation in this internal "coin" space. A quantum walk corresponds to iterating the shift and coin operators repeatedly.

This is very much like Richard Feynman's model of an electron in 1 (one) spatial and 1 (one) time dimension. He summed up the zigzagging paths, with left-moving segments corresponding to one spin (or coin), and right-moving segments to the other. See Feynman checkerboard for more details.

The transition probability for a 1-dimensional quantum walk behaves like the Hermite functions which (1) asymptotically oscillate in the classically allowed region, (2) is approximated by the Airy function around the wall of the potential,[clarification needed] and (3) exponentially decay in the classically hidden region.[8]


Atomic lattice is the leading quantum platform in terms of scalability. Coined and coinless discrete-time quantum-walk could be realized in the atomic lattice via a distance-selective spin-exchange interaction.[9] Remarkably the platform preserves the coherence over couple of hundred sites and steps in 1, 2 or 3 dimensions in the spatial space. The long-range dipolar interaction allows designing periodic boundary conditions, facilitating the QW over topological surfaces.[9]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, E. Deotto, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, and D. A. Spielman, Exponential algorithmic speedup by quantum walk, Proc. 35th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 59–68, 2003, arXiv:quant-ph/0209131.
  2. ^ A. M. Childs, L. J. Schulman, and U. V. Vazirani, Quantum algorithms for hidden nonlinear structures, Proc. 48th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 395–404, 2007, arXiv:0705.2784.
  3. ^ Andris Ambainis, Quantum walk algorithm for element distinctness, SIAM J. Comput. 37 (2007), no. 1, 210–239, arXiv:quant-ph/0311001, preliminary version in FOCS 2004.
  4. ^ F. Magniez, M. Santha, and M. Szegedy, Quantum algorithms for the triangle problem, Proc. 16th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1109–1117, 2005, quant-ph/0310134.
  5. ^ E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum algorithm for the Hamiltonian NAND tree, Theory of Computing 4 (2008), no. 1, 169–190, quant-ph/0702144
  6. ^ Andrew M. Childs, "Universal Computation by Quantum Walk".
  7. ^ Kempe, Julia (1 July 2003). "Quantum random walks – an introductory overview". Contemporary Physics. 44 (4): 307–327. arXiv:quant-ph/0303081. Bibcode:2003ConPh..44..307K. doi:10.1080/00107151031000110776. ISSN 0010-7514. S2CID 17300331.
  8. ^ T. Sunada and T. Tate, Asymptotic behavior of quantum walks on the line, Journal of Functional Analysis 262 (2012) 2608–2645
  9. ^ a b Khazali, Mohammadsadegh (3 March 2022). "Discrete-Time Quantum-Walk & Floquet Topological Insulators via Distance-Selective Rydberg-Interaction". Quantum. 6: 664. arXiv:2101.11412. Bibcode:2022Quant...6..664K. doi:10.22331/q-2022-03-03-664. ISSN 2521-327X. S2CID 246635019.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]