Resolved sideband cooling
Resolved sideband cooling is a laser cooling technique allowing cooling of tightly bound atoms and ions beyond the Doppler cooling limit, potentially to their motional ground state. Aside from the curiosity of having a particle at zero point energy, such preparation of a particle in a definite state with high probability (initialization) is an essential part of state manipulation experiments in quantum optics and quantum computing.
As of the writing of this article, the scheme behind what we refer to as resolved sideband cooling today is attributed, to D.J. Wineland and H. Dehmelt, in their article ‘‘Proposed laser fluorescence spectroscopy on Tl+
mono-ion oscillator III (sideband cooling).’’ The clarification is important as at the time of the latter article, the term also designated what we call today Doppler cooling, which was experimentally realized with atomic ion clouds in 1978 by W. Neuhauser  and independently by D.J. Wineland. An experiment that demonstrates resolved sideband cooling unequivocally in its contemporary meaning is that of Diedrich et al. Similarly unequivocal realization with non-Rydberg neutral atoms was demonstrated in 1998 by S. E. Hamann et al. via Raman cooling.
Resolved sideband cooling is a laser cooling technique that can be used to cool strongly trapped atoms to the quantum ground state of their motion. The atoms are usually precooled using the Doppler laser cooling. Subsequently, the resolved sideband cooling is used to cool the atoms beyond the Doppler cooling limit.
A cold trapped atom can be treated to a good approximation as a quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator. If the spontaneous decay rate is much smaller than the vibrational frequency of the atom in the trap, the energy levels of the system can be resolved as consisting of internal levels each corresponding to a ladder of vibrational states.
Suppose a two-level atom whose ground state is shown by g and excited state by e. Efficient laser cooling occurs when the frequency of the laser beam is tuned to the red sideband i.e.
where is the internal atomic transition frequency and is the harmonic oscillation frequency of the atom. In this case the atom undergoes the transition
where represents the state of an ion whose internal atomic state is a and the motional state is m. This process is labeled '1' in the adjacent image.
This process is labeled '2' in the adjacent image. The average effect of this mechanism is cooling the ion by one vibrational energy level. When these steps are repeated a sufficient number of times is reached with a high probability.
The core process that provides the cooling assumes a two level system that is well localized compared to the wavelength () of the transition (Lamb-Dicke regime), such as a trapped and sufficiently cooled ion or atom. After, modeling the system as a harmonic oscillator interacting with a classical monochromatic electromagnetic field yields (in the rotating wave approximation) the Hamiltonian
is the number operator
is the frequency spacing of the oscillator
is the Rabi frequency due to the atom-light interaction
is the laser detuning from
is the laser wave vector
That is, incidentally, the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian used to describe the phenomenon of an atom coupled to a cavity in cavity QED. The absorption(emission) of photons by the atom is then governed by the off-diagonal elements, with probability of a transition between vibrational states proportional to , and for each there is a manifold, , coupled to its neighbors with strength proportional to . Three such manifolds are shown in the picture.
If the transition linewidth, , a sufficiently narrow laser can be tuned to a red sideband, . For an atom starting at , the predominantly probable transition will be to . This process is depicted by arrow "1" in the picture. In the Lamb-Dicke regime, the spontaneously emitted photon (depicted by arrow "2") will be, on average, at frequency , and the net effect of such a cycle, on average, will be the removing of motional quanta. After some cycles, the average phonon number is , where is the ratio of the intensities of the red to blue −th sidebands. Repeating the processes many times while ensuring that spontaneous emission occurs provides cooling to . More rigorous mathematical treatment is given in Turchette et al. and Wineland et al. Specific treatment of cooling multiple ions can be found in Morigi et al. An insightful approach to the details of cooling is given in Eschner et al., and was selectively followed above.
For resolved sideband cooling to be effective, the process needs to start at sufficiently low . To that end, the particle is usually first cooled to the Doppler limit, then some sideband cooling cycles are applied, and finally, a measurement is taken or state manipulation is carried out. A more or less direct application of this scheme was demonstrated by Diedrich et al. with the caveat that the narrow quadrupole transition used for cooling connects the ground state to a long-lived state, and the latter had to be pumped out to achieve optimal cooling efficiency. It is not uncommon, however, that additional steps are needed in the process, due to the atomic structure of the cooled species. Examples of that are the cooling of Ca+
ions and the Raman sideband cooling of Cs atoms.
Example: cooling of Ca+
The energy levels relevant to the cooling scheme for Ca+
ions are the S1/2, P1/2, P3/2, D3/2, and D5/2, which are additionally split by a static magnetic field to their Zeeman manifolds. Doppler cooling is applied on the dipole S1/2 - P1/2 transition (397 nm), however, there is about 6% probability of spontaneous decay to the long-lived D3/2 state, so that state is simultaneously pumped out (at 866 nm) to improve Doppler cooling. Sideband cooling is performed on the narrow quadrupole transition S1/2 - D5/2 (729 nm), however, the long-lived D5/2 state needs to be pumped out to the short lived P3/2 state (at 854 nm) to recycle the ion to the ground S1/2 state and maintain cooling performance. One possible implementation was carried out by Leibfried et al. and a similar one is detailed by Roos. For each data point in the 729 nm absorption spectrum, a few hundred iterations of the following are executed:
- the ion is Doppler cooled with 397 nm and 866 nm light, with 854 nm light on as well
- the ion is spin polarized to the S1/2(m=-1/2) state by applying a 397 nm light for the last few moments of the Doppler cooling process
- sideband cooling loops are applied at the first red sideband of the D5/2(m=-5/2) 729 nm transition
- to ensure the population ends up in the S1/2(m=-1/2) state, another 397 nm pulse is applied
- manipulation is carried out and analysis is carried out by applying 729 nm light at the frequency of interest
- detection is carried out with 397 nm and 866 nm light: discrimination between dark (D) and bright (S) state is based on a pre-determined threshold value of fluorescence counts
Variations of this scheme relaxing the requirements or improving the results are being investigated/used by several ion-trapping groups.
Example: Raman sideband cooling of Cs atoms
A Raman transition replaces the one-photon transition used in the sideband above by a two-photon process via a virtual level. In the Cs cooling experiment carried out by Hamann et al., trapping is provided by an isotropic optical lattice in a magnetic field, which also provides Raman coupling to the red sideband of the Zeeman manifolds. The process followed in  is:
- preparation of cold sample of Cs atoms is carried out in optical molasses, in a magneto-optic trap
- atoms are allowed to occupy a 2D, near resonance lattice
- the lattice is changed adiabatically to a far off resonance lattice, which leaves the sample sufficiently well cooled for sideband cooling to be effective (Lamb-Dicke regime)
- a magnetic field is turned on to tune the Raman coupling to the red motional sideband
- relaxation between the hyperfine states is provided by a pump/repump laser pair
- after some time, pumping is intensified to transfer the population to a specific hyperfine state
- lattice is turned off and time of flight techniques are employed to perform Stern-Gerlach analysis
- Monroe, C.; Meekhof, D. M.; King, B. E.; Jefferts, S. R.; Itano, W. M.; Wineland, D. J.; Gould, P. (27 November 1995). "Resolved-Sideband Raman Cooling of a Bound Atom to the 3D Zero-Point Energy". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 75 (22): 4011–4014. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4011. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 10059792.
- Eschner, Jürgen; Morigi, Giovanna; Schmidt-Kaler, Ferdinand; Blatt, Rainer (1 April 2003). "Laser cooling of trapped ions". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. The Optical Society. 20 (5): 1003–1015. doi:10.1364/josab.20.001003. ISSN 0740-3224.
- D. Wineland and H. Dehmelt, ‘‘Proposed laser fluorescence spectroscopy on Tl+
mono-ion oscillator III (sideband cooling),’’ Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 637 (1975).
- Neuhauser, W.; Hohenstatt, M.; Toschek, P.; Dehmelt, H. (24 July 1978). "Optical-Sideband Cooling of Visible Atom Cloud Confined in Parabolic Well". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 41 (4): 233–236. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.41.233. ISSN 0031-9007.
- Wineland, D. J.; Drullinger, R. E.; Walls, F. L. (19 June 1978). "Radiation-Pressure Cooling of Bound Resonant Absorbers". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 40 (25): 1639–1642. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.1639. ISSN 0031-9007.
- Diedrich, F.; Bergquist, J. C.; Itano, Wayne M.; Wineland, D. J. (23 January 1989). "Laser Cooling to the Zero-Point Energy of Motion". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 62 (4): 403–406. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.403. ISSN 0031-9007.
- Hamann, S. E.; Haycock, D. L.; Klose, G.; Pax, P. H.; Deutsch, I. H.; Jessen, P. S. (11 May 1998). "Resolved-Sideband Raman Cooling to the Ground State of an Optical Lattice". Physical Review Letters. 80 (19): 4149–4152. arXiv:quant-ph/9801025. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.4149. ISSN 0031-9007.
- Schliesser, A.; Rivière, R.; Anetsberger, G.; Arcizet, O.; Kippenberg, T. J. (13 April 2008). "Resolved-sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator". Nature Physics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 4 (5): 415–419. arXiv:0709.4036. doi:10.1038/nphys939. ISSN 1745-2473.
- Wineland, D.J.; Monroe, C.; Itano, W.M.; Leibfried, D.; King, B.E.; Meekhof, D.M. (1998). "Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions". Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 103 (3): 259–328. doi:10.6028/jres.103.019. ISSN 1044-677X. PMC 4898965. PMID 28009379.
- Turchette, Q. A.; Kielpinski, D.; King, B. E.; Leibfried, D.; Meekhof, D. M.; et al. (2000). "Heating of trapped ions from the quantum ground state". Physical Review A. 61 (6): 063418. arXiv:quant-ph/0002040. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.61.063418.
- Morigi, G.; Eschner, J.; Cirac, J. I.; Zoller, P. (1 April 1999). "Laser cooling of two trapped ions: Sideband cooling beyond the Lamb-Dicke limit". Physical Review A. American Physical Society (APS). 59 (5): 3797–3808. doi:10.1103/physreva.59.3797. ISSN 1050-2947.
- Leibfried, D.; Roos, C.; Barton, P.; Rohde, H.; Gulde, S.; et al. (2001). Experiments towards quantum information with trapped Calcium ions. AIP Confence Proceedings. 551. p. 130. doi:10.1063/1.1354345. ISSN 0094-243X.
- C. Roos. Controlling the quantum state of trapped ions (PDF) (Ph.D.). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-01-11. Retrieved 2014-03-17.