Jump to content

S v Morrison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grutness (talk | contribs) at 06:50, 28 August 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In S v Morrison, an important case in South African criminal procedure, the court considered whether or not there is a duty on the presiding officer to inform the accused of his right to legal representation.

In terms of section 73(2) of the CPA, the accused has a right to legal representation, but the court held that this right is generally known to most people, and that no rule of law or practice requires a trial court to spell this out to every unrepresented accused.

The court held that whether there is such a duty depends on the circumstances of the case.

This case was heard before the Constitution came into force. The Constitution now explicitly protects the right of the accused to be informed of his right to legal representation.

Notes