Jump to content

Sahlins–Obeyesekere debate

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jonathan Tweet (talk | contribs) at 22:27, 3 March 2016 (explain jargon). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Sahlins–Obeyesekere debate is a academic controversy in anthropology about the death of the British explorer James Cook, particularly whether the native Hawaiians believed him to be Lono, a deity (or akua) associated with fertility, agriculture, rainfall, music and peace. The debate took shape in 1992, when Gananath Obeyesekere published The Apotheosis of Captain Cook, which criticized the work of Marshall Sahlins on the issue. In addition to the factual issues, the debate has become symbolic of deeper issues in anthropology, including whether Western scholars can truly understand non-Western cultures.[1][2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ Howe, K. R. (1996-06-01). "Review article: The making of cook's death". The Journal of Pacific History. 31 (1): 108–118. doi:10.1080/00223349608572810. ISSN 0022-3344.
  2. ^ Parker, Samuel K. (1995-03-01). "The Revenge of Practical Reason? A Review Essay On Gananath Obeyesekere's The Apotheosis of Captain Cook". Oceania. 65 (3): 257–267. doi:10.1002/j.1834-4461.1995.tb02507.x. ISSN 1834-4461.
  3. ^ Friedman, Jonathan (1997-02-01). "How "Natives" Think: About Captain Cook, For Example". American Ethnologist. 24 (1): 261–262. doi:10.1525/ae.1997.24.1.261. ISSN 1548-1425.
  4. ^ Borofsky, Robert (1997-04-01). "Cook, Lono, Obeyesekere, and Sahlins". Current Anthropology. 38 (2): 255–282. doi:10.1086/204608.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sahlins–Obeyesekere_debate&oldid=708145445"